It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Loveaduck
Khan is simply pointing out what all Americans are aware of anyway.. That Donald Trump has led a life sheltered from "real world" emotions and experiences.
But the way Kzir Khan has been showing up on various TV segments this week, he is also loving the limelight and taking advantage of his brief tenure in the spot-light. The guy is now fully Americanized. I have no doubt that we'll see Khan in a future movie about this crazy election cycle.
What american would go to pakistan and say that allah made Trump screw up?
The guy is a dirtbag. He's a radical muslim and dishonors his own son.
His son died at the hands of people like his father.
I even mentioned that he is pissed off his son joined the US military and saved american lives.
Poor mom had no say about anything.
originally posted by: DJW001
So all this makes it okay to dodge the draft, then accept a Purple Heart and mock the recipient. Got it: people who serve and make personal sacrifices are losers. Losers for Trump?
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: CornShucker
Khazr Khan was accurately describing the beliefs of devout Muslims. That does not mean that they are his personal beliefs. Fail. Thank you for playing.
Juristic Classification Islamic Law
by Khizr Khan
To Muslims, the Quran being the very word af God, it is the absolute authority from which springs the very conception of legality and every legal obligation. -- All emphasis is CornShucker's
The seminar's purpose is neither to address human rights situations in particular countries nor to provoke a dialogue between the Muslim and Western worlds. Rather, the seminar is a forum for discussion of human rights issues which are important to Muslims. Niall MacDermot, Secretary General of the International Commission of Jurists, comments on the different approaches to the concept of human rights employed by Muslims and Westemers. He notes that “[m]any of the conclusions and principles are the same, but they are arrived at by a different route. The westem dichotomy between economic, social and cultural rights and the classic civil and politiual rights does not exist for you [Muslims]." -- All emphasis is CornShucker's
originally posted by: CornShucker
originally posted by: DJW001
So all this makes it okay to dodge the draft, then accept a Purple Heart and mock the recipient. Got it: people who serve and make personal sacrifices are losers. Losers for Trump?
What does this have to do with Kr. Khan? When did Mr. Trump mock the man who gave him his Purple Heart?
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: CornShucker
Find the word "devout" for me...
Find the words "I believe...."
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
From his work, which I linked previously, his own words not quoting anyone else:
These are brief extracts from a long letter that has been held authentic by all Muslim jurists. It vividly demonstrates that the structure of Islamic law - the Shari'ah - was completed during the lifetime of the Prophet Muhammed, in the Quran and Sunnah.
All other juridicial works which have been written during the more than thirteen centuries are very rich and indispensable, but they must always be subordinate to the Shari'ah and open to reconsideration by all Muslims.
To Muslims, the Quran being the very word of God, it is the absolute authority from which springs the very conception of legality and every legal obligation.
All other jurdicial works must be subordinate to the Shari'ah? Does that include United States Constitutional law?
The Quran is the source of legality and every legal obligation?
How does that square when it conflicts with U.S. code?
That's a deflection. I'm asking you to back up your statement. He never used the qualifier "devout" and neither did Mr. MacDermot.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: CornShucker
That's a deflection. I'm asking you to back up your statement. He never used the qualifier "devout" and neither did Mr. MacDermot.
Actually, you're the one who has to prove that what he wrote about "Muslims" is what he himself believes. But then, you are such an expert on world religions that you know there is no such thing as a "moderate Muslim."
ISLAMABAD: (Dunya News) – The father of martyred United States (US) soldier Captain Humayun Khan, Khizr Khan, has on Thursday said that the Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is unacceptable to the US. He said that Allah makes people like Trump to make mistakes to discredit them in public eyes forever, reported Dunya News.
Talking exclusively to Dunya News on program Nuqta-e-Nazar, Khizr Khan said that he often gets emotional while speaking in public but when nature wants you to do something, words come by themselves. He said his speech was a gift from the God. “I showed the constitution only because I wanted to remind people that nobody could be discriminated against in the name of religion”, said Khizr.
Khan said that Donald Trump actually exposed himself by criticizing him. He added that Donald Trump’s words were stupid. “All citizens must be equal before the state. All immigrants are against the stupid Republican candidate”, he said.
The father of the martyred soldier paid rich tribute to the martyrs and soldiers of Pakistan through Dunya News.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: CornShucker
Once again, where does he say that he, personally, considers the Qu'ran to be the ultimate source of law?
Juristic Classification Islamic Law
by Khizr Khan
To Muslims, the Quran being the very word af God, it is the absolute authority from which springs the very conception of legality and every legal obligation. -- All emphasis is CornShucker's
originally posted by: xuenchen
Important Topic Updates
Notice the media got quiet about Khizr Khan? Turns out he used his dead sons foundation to create piss fetish club on Ashley Madison
Important Topic Updates
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: xuenchen
That is what angers me the most, his son is the hero, he died for his country, yes the US of America, but his parents are nothing but a disgrace to that hero, the death can not talk, but the family can be bought.
This the state of politics in our nation this days when political rats can cash on the death for political gain, while the families can cash on the financial implications of looking innocent on TV.
Nothing but crap.
Meanwhile the rest of the hero in America that are still alive and maimed to war are forgotten, they don't look good on TV.
Despicable what they are doing.
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: CornShucker
originally posted by: DJW001
So all this makes it okay to dodge the draft, then accept a Purple Heart and mock the recipient. Got it: people who serve and make personal sacrifices are losers. Losers for Trump?
What does this have to do with Kr. Khan? When did Mr. Trump mock the man who gave him his Purple Heart?
Getting wounded in defense of your country is a sacrifice; Trump has never made a sacrifice in his life. In fact, Trump got five deferments to avoid serving his country during the Viet Nam war. When the wounded vet handed him the Purple Heart, Trump mocked him by saying "I always wanted one of these," when clearly, he was afraid to earn one, then went on to grind the poor vet's nose into the ground by pointing out that just taking the medal away from someone who earned it was "easier." Trump is, for all practical purposes, The Joker, delighting in mocking others' suffering.
I really don't understand how anyone could be that stupid to start denigrating someone else, when their closet is full.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: nomoredemsorreps
I really don't understand how anyone could be that stupid to start denigrating someone else, when their closet is full.
If you don't like the message, attack the messenger. How very Trumpian of you. So what if Khan has a fetish? Although no-one likes to admit it, nearly everyone does, and I'm sure we will be hearing more about the Trumpsters as the election draws near.
Not one Trump supporter has been able to refute Khan's basic accusation: that Trump has never made a meaningful sacrifice in his life. Instead of denigrating the messenger, list all of Trump's noble sacrifices... or even just one.
So what, how many others haven't sacrificed for the vietnam war?
Did hillary or bill?
While at Oxford he [Bill Clinton]also participated in Vietnam War protests and organized an October 1969 Moratorium to End the War in Vietnam event.