It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

MANDELA EFFECT - I just discovered a jaw dropping change

page: 18
19
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 4 2016 @ 12:53 PM
link   
a reply to: Greggers




However, several philosophical arguments can be made against it, one of them being Occam's Razor.


And it would still be inconclusive.




posted on Aug, 4 2016 @ 12:54 PM
link   
a reply to: TheMaxHeadroomIncident

No. Seems to me you're saying your shared memory is evidence of it.

Seems to me you can't even entertain the possibility you and others remembered your anatomy incorrectly.

Seems to me you don't have anything but feelings to go by.

Seems to me you have no real desire to discuss this subject at any length.

You're in this thread for the same reason I initially came in here. Entertainment.

You see, while I utterly disbelieve this drivel. I feel I asked some decent questions. Relative to trying to ascertain the plausibility of these notions. Offered up some alternatives. Offered up some food for thought.

Seems you can't, or don't want to take a critical look at this ME thing.



posted on Aug, 4 2016 @ 12:59 PM
link   
a reply to: WakeUpBeer




Seems you can't, or don't want to take a critical look at this ME thing.


Then you havn't been paying attention. I even said I would never claim to have proof of the ME, in the post you responded to.

I have said multiple times that my approach is agnostic and not once did I say that any option is impossible.



posted on Aug, 4 2016 @ 01:03 PM
link   
a reply to: TheMaxHeadroomIncident

Hahahaha!

You won't accept the answers given by anyone unless it confirms to the ME being a real thing.



posted on Aug, 4 2016 @ 01:06 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

Why should I accept claims that are impossible to prove as absolute truth. Are you accepting my claims?
edit on 4-8-2016 by TheMaxHeadroomIncident because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 4 2016 @ 01:08 PM
link   
a reply to: TheMaxHeadroomIncident

Impossible to prove????

There are THOUSANDS of scientific studies going back HUNDREDS of years about memory and how it's faulty.

But yeah, timeline shifts lol.



posted on Aug, 4 2016 @ 01:10 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

Again with the dumb arguments. I can also prove that memory is in fact accurate most of the time. Does this prove the ME is real?



posted on Aug, 4 2016 @ 01:12 PM
link   
a reply to: TheMaxHeadroomIncident

See? Dismissing the evidence in favour of the unprovable so your precious ME is "real".



posted on Aug, 4 2016 @ 01:13 PM
link   
Hey I have a question.

Person A shifts from Timeline A into Timeline B.

What happens to Timeline B's Person A when they make the shift?



posted on Aug, 4 2016 @ 01:25 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

I am not dismissing anything, just pointing out your logical fallacy.



posted on Aug, 4 2016 @ 01:26 PM
link   
a reply to: TheMaxHeadroomIncident

What logical fallacy? That there is EVIDENCE of bad memories that can account for the ME?

The only logical fallacy is the ME. No proof. Nothing to verify. Nothing. It's all how "someone remembers" or how "someone feels".



posted on Aug, 4 2016 @ 01:28 PM
link   
a reply to: WakeUpBeer

Maybe they shift to timeline A?



posted on Aug, 4 2016 @ 01:29 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79




What logical fallacy? That there is EVIDENCE of bad memories that can account for the ME?


The logical fallacy is that you think that "can account" is the same as "does account". Derp.



posted on Aug, 4 2016 @ 01:32 PM
link   
a reply to: TheMaxHeadroomIncident

So now you're arguing semantics?

I guess the ME has nothing going for it so it always boils down to semantics and "I just know!"

Enjoy your imaginary effect and the NEED for it.



posted on Aug, 4 2016 @ 01:38 PM
link   
a reply to: heineken

This was my drawing.



posted on Aug, 4 2016 @ 01:46 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79




So now you're arguing semantics?


No, I am not. Jeez. I am talking about your logic.

Just because something CAN account for something doesn't mean it actually DOES account for it.




edit on 4-8-2016 by TheMaxHeadroomIncident because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 4 2016 @ 01:47 PM
link   
a reply to: TheMaxHeadroomIncident

And just because people like the idea of the Mandela effect, doesn't mean there is one.



posted on Aug, 4 2016 @ 01:49 PM
link   
a reply to: TheMaxHeadroomIncident

For you to infer I said memory is always wrong shows you are grasping at straws. You have zero real argument to stand on. Memory is OFTEN wrong, not always, not even most of the time, but often. People commonly make the same mistakes as well. You are refusing to put the puzzle pieces together.



posted on Aug, 4 2016 @ 01:50 PM
link   
a reply to: TheMaxHeadroomIncident

No, in fact it proves the ME is fake. Please think harder about it.



posted on Aug, 4 2016 @ 01:51 PM
link   
a reply to: WakeUpBeer

Obviously they shift to timeline C...



new topics

top topics



 
19
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join