It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

VFW slams Trump over Khan and Gold Star families.

page: 8
18
<< 5  6  7   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 2 2016 @ 03:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: TonyS

No, only those that supports Hillary in the VFW are doing the condemnation.

Is all a political game you know.



No...A GOP Congressman announced today he was voting for Hillary, John McCain has condemned Trump, Paul Ryan has condemned Trump's remarks...dozens of military families of all political stripes have condemned him..

Broad array of military luminaries condemn Trump over attacks on Khan family

]Aside from McCain, a bipartisan coalition of veterans, family members of military personnel killed in the line of duty, a veteran serving in Congress and an ex-diplomat sent a letter to Trump calling his criticism of the Khans an affront to each of them. It also called for him to apologize.

“Your statements are unacceptable, especially from someone seeking to serve as Commander in Chief,” the letter said. “The Khans’ sacrifice has earned them the right to ask hard questions of those seeking elected office.”


Gold Star Families Attack Trump Over Comments About Ghazala Khan


A letter signed by the Gold Star families — the term for those who have lost loved ones during military service — also called Trump's comments "repugnant, and personally offensive."

"When you question a mother's pain, by implying that her religion, not her grief, kept her from addressing an arena of people, you are attacking us," the letter added. "When you say your job building buildings is akin to our sacrifice, you are attacking our sacrifice."


www.nbcnews.com...

THIS IS NOT ABOUT POLITICS...IT is about HUMAN DECENCY. He has no business as Commander and Chief of the US military.




posted on Aug, 2 2016 @ 03:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5


He has no business as Commander and Chief of the US military


But Hillary does?



posted on Aug, 2 2016 @ 03:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Indigo5


He has no business as Commander and Chief of the US military


But Hillary does?





Yes she does. If my choices for a ride home from the bar come down to a slobbering, mentally handicapped drunk and a sober woman who I might not like very much, it's an easy choice.
She knows how to drive the car..she is sober..He has literal mental issues going on not the least of which is non-existent impulse control, a sociopathic demeanor, insanely thin-skin, a child's emotional maturity and knows absolutely nothing about foreign affairs...He said just last week Russia would not go into Ukraine...seriously...he was unaware they invaded two years ago. He's dangerous nut-case...and no...he has no business as Commander and Chief..If Trump was bankrupt tomorrow, he could not get a job running a McDonalds.



posted on Aug, 2 2016 @ 03:33 PM
link   
DRIP..DRIP...

Ex-top Christie aide backs Clinton over Trump

Top Jeb Bush adviser leaves GOP, will vote for Clinton if Florida close

Richard Hanna Becomes First Republican Congressman To Say He'll Vote For Hillary Clinton

Keep telling yourselves this is just the VFW...Then make up excuses for the other Gold Star families condemning him...and make excuses for John McCain and the folks above ..and the polls showing him sinking..



posted on Aug, 2 2016 @ 03:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5

Trump is a lot of things.

But he didn't steal the election like Hillary and the DNC did.

He did leave Americans to die in Benghazi.

He didn't illegally distribute classified emails.



posted on Aug, 2 2016 @ 03:48 PM
link   
a reply to: projectvxn

sounds like you have a lot of pent up "rage" there yourself, you just went over all these bullet points that seem rather rehearsed, like you have said them before, so which is it boo hoo for the soldiers or not?



posted on Aug, 2 2016 @ 03:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Indigo5

Trump is a lot of things.

But he didn't steal the election like Hillary and the DNC did.



Hillary won the nomination any way the math is counted. Did the DNC work to make it happen behind closed doors? Yes..And the RNC worked to get rid of Trump until they ran out of options, mostly because the alternative(s) like Cruz sucked and everybody hated him.



He did leave Americans to die in Benghazi.



Utter trash and BS. More hearings than 9-11 and the Kennedy Assassination combined and the conclusion was still that they did everything that could be done.



He didn't illegally distribute classified emails.


Give him 24 hours in office and you will see much worse than 3 emails out of 100,000 with inaccurately marked classifications.


He will effen tweet classified material as POTUS..






posted on Aug, 2 2016 @ 03:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Indigo5

Trump is a lot of things.

But he didn't steal the election like Hillary and the DNC did.

He did leave Americans to die in Benghazi.

He didn't illegally distribute classified emails.





we're not talking about hilary!!!!! every single time a trump flaw is pointed out automatically the response is "well hilary this or hilary that", it sounds like a school yard argument enough already, defend trump without bringing hilary into it. hilary does not make trump make stupid decisions over and over again.



posted on Aug, 2 2016 @ 04:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: khnum
If you do your research you will find Mr Khan has connections to the Saudi Government,the Muslim brotherhood and the Clinton foundation whilst his son died in an American uniform daddy is no great friend of America THE WORD DISENGENUOUS COMES TO MIND.


Oh look, you've been listening to that moron Stone.



posted on Aug, 2 2016 @ 04:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: projectvxn
But he didn't steal the election like Hillary and the DNC did.


Neither did Hillary. Bernie lost.



He did leave Americans to die in Benghazi.


Neither did Hillary. After spending more time on Benghazi, all focused on Hillary than we spent as a nation on 9/11 it was concluded that she acted properly and responsibly.



He didn't illegally distribute classified emails.


Neither did Hillary considering the FBI couldn't move forward with the accusation.





posted on Aug, 2 2016 @ 04:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5

Rhinos one and all. Their opinion isnt worth the text i am typing in.



posted on Aug, 2 2016 @ 04:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Aazadan

The DNC emails and the FBI would beg to differ.



posted on Aug, 2 2016 @ 04:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: Indigo5

Rhinos one and all. Their opinion isnt worth the text i am typing in.


No "h" in RINOs...

I am pretty sure that those "RINOs" will be the only thing left of the Republican Party when the dust settles...the Trump movement can call themselves something like Neo-Trumpers if they like...but he sure aint a "Conservative" or "Republican" and everyone is starting to figure that out.
edit on 2-8-2016 by Indigo5 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2016 @ 08:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Aazadan

The DNC emails and the FBI would beg to differ.


The same FBI who said they didn't have enough evidence to start a prosecution?



posted on Aug, 2 2016 @ 08:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Indigo5

Ha, another political rat moving sides don't you love it, they are all alike, and for "HUMAN DECENCY" got tell that to Mr. Khan he didn't have any when he allow Hillary to use his death son for political game. Now he can not take the hit when all his life and links to the Clintons is out for dissecting.

Hillary has not business as a commanding in chief and will go into history as the most corrupted politician that evaded jail in this nation.



posted on Aug, 2 2016 @ 08:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Aazadan

They have plenty but chose not to for political purposes.

Or do I need to dig up the video of the FBI director saying that anyone but Hillary would face consequences?



posted on Aug, 3 2016 @ 05:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: projectvxn
a reply to: Aazadan

They have plenty but chose not to for political purposes.

Or do I need to dig up the video of the FBI director saying that anyone but Hillary would face consequences?


That's because we're not going to start prosecuting former members of high level administrations. Giving them those positions is giving them extra legal protections for the rest of their life. The alternative outcome is too bloody for anyone to consider it.

So from a legal standpoint, no. They have an unfounded accusation that wasn't even strong enough to take to court. After how many months/years of investigation?



posted on Aug, 3 2016 @ 10:47 AM
link   
a reply to: Aazadan

Well the constitution allows prosecutions so why not? becasuse they are rich is why. not because they dont want to.
It would make things better if they had to account.



new topics

top topics



 
18
<< 5  6  7   >>

log in

join