It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Paris strikes astonishing partnership with secret Isis sponsor tied to Hillary Clinton [EXCLUSIVE]

page: 5
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in


posted on Aug, 3 2016 @ 10:58 AM
a reply to: Teikiatsu

One word response: Desperation.

One word in response, to your one word in response: naivete

War and money make the world go 'round.

You guys think you're so found a clue! Woooo whoooo! By George, you think you're on to something! You guys slay me!

posted on Aug, 3 2016 @ 11:00 AM
a reply to: AboveBoard

Lafarge paid taxes to a terrorist organization so that they would be allowed to continue to do business in the area.
In other words, they sold out, they did the wrong thing, out of greed.
By giving the terrorists money they financially supported their activities.
The right thing to do would have been to not do business in the area, if doing so required financially supporting terrorists.

This greed is probably the same thing that prompted them to contribute to the Clinton Foundation.
Hillary was in a position to make things happen in the middle east - things that could help the Lafarge corporation.

posted on Aug, 3 2016 @ 12:22 PM
So...a quick question.

Are all of Lafarge's former Board Members and are all of the organizations that received charitable donations from Lafarge considered to be linked to ISIS and, because of their association, directly funding terrorists? If so, how far back? The company was started in 1833...

What about all employees of the company? Are they guilty too? The employees in Syria at least? Or ONLY the employees that 1) negotiated and knew about the payments, and 2) those higher-ups that may have rubber-stamped it in the company, assuming they understood the nature of who was being paid.

I'm just trying to see how on earth this could be something that goes from "giant international corporation does something bad at one plant and pays terrorists," to equalling "Hillary Clinton, former Board Member and founder of Charity said company paid a donation to, is funding ISIS..." It doesn't add up. No one could possibly hope to prosecute this - seriously.

Does this really make sense to anyone????

- AB

posted on Aug, 3 2016 @ 12:25 PM
a reply to: BlueAjah

Is there proof that Hillary "made things happen" for them in the middle east? How was she personally in a position to do this for the company?

Even if she did, is there proof that she aided, or approved of, or had anything to do with. them paying ISIS protection money (as in "mafia" type protection)?

edit on 3-8-2016 by AboveBoard because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 3 2016 @ 01:13 PM
a reply to: AboveBoard

Is there proof that Hillary "made things happen" for them in the middle east?

Well, she certainly was involved in this trade agreement, most likely to the benefit of as many of her donors as possible:

The accord was again signed between the two commerce ministers concerned in the office of the prime minister in Islamabad. Secretary Clinton and Special Envoy Hoolbrooke were also present on the occasion.

The obvious question is: why should the simple renewal of a trade agreement - routine business between two states -- have been given such high profile? The nature of the agreement which the prime minister refers to as "an understanding, not a deal, subject to certification by the cabinet" defies logic.

you-know-where leaks dotorg/gifiles/docs/86/863537_usa-united-states-americas-.html

new topics

top topics
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in