It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hillary: Second Amendment ‘Is Subject To Reasonable Regulation’

page: 11
39
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 01:47 PM
link   
Oogey boogey 2nd amendment exercising citizens who have never done anything wrong!

OOGEY BOOGEY!

Meanwhile, liberals ignore reality





posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 01:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Masterjaden

You're right, the Supreme Court is the final arbiter of law.

Truth is subjective.



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 01:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: ScriptedSociety
Oogey boogey 2nd amendment exercising citizens who have never done anything wrong!

OOGEY BOOGEY!

Meanwhile, liberals ignore reality



LOL The reality of a guy in a beard sitting in an old dirty chair on a deserted street in some nameless midde eastern city and country? Oh, wait, that's the guy from Duck Dynasty!
edit on 1-8-2016 by amazing because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 02:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6

They are not the final arbiter of LAW either. Try reading the primer document to our nation if you're confused... You know that pesky little document called the DOI...

Which is the sole purpose of the 2nd amendment. Not to hunt, not to sport shoot, not to defend ourselves and our families from criminals. It is to protect ourselves from politicians, judges and other govt. officials who fail to properly do their jobs and protect our liberties.

Jaden



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 02:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Masterjaden



Knowing what they are intended for and preparing to use them for that if necessary, is NOT fantasizing about them... Jesus, you act like people are stroking themselves while cleaning their rifles...lol..


I would not be surprised.



The only person here in fantasy land is you, thinking that curling into a ball and waiting for someone to rescue you is realistic...


I support the 2nd amendment and exercise it. I don't need rescuing. I also don't feel threatened by the government.



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 02:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Masterjaden



You sound like most lefties here, attempting to shift the blame away from the real cause to those you oppose.


Why would I try to shift blame towards myself? I am pro-2nd.



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 02:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: amazing

originally posted by: ScriptedSociety
Oogey boogey 2nd amendment exercising citizens who have never done anything wrong!

OOGEY BOOGEY!

Meanwhile, liberals ignore reality



LOL The reality of a guy in a beard sitting in an old dirty chair on a deserted street in some nameless midde eastern city and country? Oh, wait, that's the guy from Duck Dynasty!


The left voted for that reality yet they dismiss it and the implications of it. Easier to ignore than to admit they were wrong.

So sad to see people intentionally deluding themselves to such a low level of existence. Blindly following without ever forming their own perspective of what is going on in the world around them.



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 02:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: ScriptedSociety

originally posted by: amazing

originally posted by: ScriptedSociety
Oogey boogey 2nd amendment exercising citizens who have never done anything wrong!

OOGEY BOOGEY!

Meanwhile, liberals ignore reality



LOL The reality of a guy in a beard sitting in an old dirty chair on a deserted street in some nameless midde eastern city and country? Oh, wait, that's the guy from Duck Dynasty!


The left voted for that reality yet they dismiss it and the implications of it. Easier to ignore than to admit they were wrong.

So sad to see people intentionally deluding themselves to such a low level of existence. Blindly following without ever forming their own perspective of what is going on in the world around them.


What are you saying though? That ISIS, I assume you aren't afraid of a few idiots hunting ducks in some backwoods somewhere, is a big threat and we should be afraid?

You realize that ISIS is regionally contained and that although they have some influence around the world and can recruit, new recruits just can't get to them and they are being bombed out of existence. By some accounts just last year there were...8,296 aistrikes
20,000 Coalition estimates of DAESH fighters killed, 28,578 bombs & missiles dropped,653-2,001 civilians claimed killed
13 known coalition partners. And IRAQ, Syria, Russia, Turkey have all had ground troops involved in either small skirmished or big battles.
edit on 1-8-2016 by amazing because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 02:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: amazing

originally posted by: ScriptedSociety

originally posted by: amazing

originally posted by: ScriptedSociety
Oogey boogey 2nd amendment exercising citizens who have never done anything wrong!

OOGEY BOOGEY!

Meanwhile, liberals ignore reality



LOL The reality of a guy in a beard sitting in an old dirty chair on a deserted street in some nameless midde eastern city and country? Oh, wait, that's the guy from Duck Dynasty!


The left voted for that reality yet they dismiss it and the implications of it. Easier to ignore than to admit they were wrong.

So sad to see people intentionally deluding themselves to such a low level of existence. Blindly following without ever forming their own perspective of what is going on in the world around them.


What are you saying though? That ISIS, I assume you aren't afraid of a few idiots hunting ducks in some backwoods somewhere, is a big threat and we should be afraid?

You realize that ISIS is regionally contained and that although they have some influence around the world and can recruit, new recruits just can't get to them and they are being bombed out of existence. By some accounts just last year there were...8,296 aistrikes
20,000 Coalition estimates of DAESH fighters killed, 28,578 bombs & missiles dropped,653-2,001 civilians claimed killed
13 known coalition partners. And IRAQ, Syria, Russia, Turkey have all had ground troops involved in either small skirmished or big battles.


I never mentioned anything about ISIS



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 02:39 PM
link   
a reply to: TheAmazingYeti

...and if, wise one, your brain says "This might be a good time for a firearm."?

What then? I'm assuming you're going to check yourself into the nearest psychiatric facility? Paid for, of course, by Obama-care?



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 02:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: ScriptedSociety

originally posted by: amazing

originally posted by: ScriptedSociety

originally posted by: amazing

originally posted by: ScriptedSociety
Oogey boogey 2nd amendment exercising citizens who have never done anything wrong!

OOGEY BOOGEY!

Meanwhile, liberals ignore reality



LOL The reality of a guy in a beard sitting in an old dirty chair on a deserted street in some nameless midde eastern city and country? Oh, wait, that's the guy from Duck Dynasty!


The left voted for that reality yet they dismiss it and the implications of it. Easier to ignore than to admit they were wrong.

So sad to see people intentionally deluding themselves to such a low level of existence. Blindly following without ever forming their own perspective of what is going on in the world around them.


What are you saying though? That ISIS, I assume you aren't afraid of a few idiots hunting ducks in some backwoods somewhere, is a big threat and we should be afraid?

You realize that ISIS is regionally contained and that although they have some influence around the world and can recruit, new recruits just can't get to them and they are being bombed out of existence. By some accounts just last year there were...8,296 aistrikes
20,000 Coalition estimates of DAESH fighters killed, 28,578 bombs & missiles dropped,653-2,001 civilians claimed killed
13 known coalition partners. And IRAQ, Syria, Russia, Turkey have all had ground troops involved in either small skirmished or big battles.


I never mentioned anything about ISIS


Sorry. I'm dense this morning. How does Willie Robinson sitting on a couch equate to liberals ignoring reality?



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 02:44 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus



The Constitution is not a list of things the private citizen can and cannot do, it is a list of things the government cannot do.


Quoted for truth.



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 02:52 PM
link   
a reply to: ScriptedSociety

...THAT dude could shoot WAY better...JUST sayin...



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 03:05 PM
link   
a reply to: stosh64

They all lie, all the time. They constantly push these lies on the people and take advantage of the ignorance of the masses. There is no gun show loop hole. There is no online loop hole. We already have comprehensive background checks.

These are all lies. Most of these lying politicians do not even know the difference between semi and automatic.

The worst part is people parrot this nonsense. They will actually run around town repeating this crap without even looking into it for all of 30 seconds that it takes to debunk these lies.



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 03:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Masterjaden

Not really. The court had to give itself the power of judicial review because the constitution didn't specifically grant the court that power. And then a case came along where the court had to decide whether the constitution was the law of the land, or congress was. The court effectively ruled to grant itself the authority to override congress if an act or law was in conflict with the constitution.

Funny, you never hear the gun bunnies complain about judicial review and jurisdiction in a case like DC v Heller.
edit on 1-8-2016 by Shamrock6 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 03:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Klassified

They already won. The younger generation soaks up the anti-freedom propaganda. When you see people begging for our enslavement on discussion forums such as this one, you know we are toast.



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 03:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6

Well, you see, that's because those who support the constitution first and foremost want government to do the job they are supposed to do.

Contrary to you gun grabber's thoughts, the people who are standing up for the liberties that have been lost do NOT want blood shed, they do NOT want revolution. They simply desire their rights to not be continuously trampled as they have been.

They want the constitution to be followed. To say though that regardless of what conclusion the SCOTUS comes to is the end of it is to NOT understand the very foundations of this country.

The principle foundation of this country is the realization that ALL government is founded on the principle motive that government is instituted at the consent of the governed. That meaning that"The People" are in charge and have the final say in all things.

To think that the GOVERNMENT and those that run it grant the people ANYTHING, especially their rights and liberties are to completely misunderstand the nature of government and ours in particular since it was spelled out for us by our founders.

No the reality is that the government is granted all of its authority and power by the people and the people can choose to revoke that authority at any time.

That last sentence is the SOLE reason for the inclusion of the 2nd amendment in the bill of rights. They spelled it out and required all governement personnel to swear an oath to defend it. They wanted to remind everyone in government where their authority came from and ensure that they knew that the people had the means to revoke that authority at will if the government should become destructive of these ends, these ends being the consent of the governed.

Jaden



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 04:15 PM
link   
YEAH ,WHAT he said!
edit on 1-8-2016 by cavtrooper7 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 04:40 PM
link   
At this point , Clinton should be declared a domestic enemy of the Constitution (and everyone and everything else in this country in that respect)




posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 05:45 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

It is always a good place to start. Another line of thought is that Congress has both the authority to call forth the militia and the responsibility to provide arms, ammo, training, command and other needful provisions such as food, clothing and shelter.... which is another old definition for "well regulated"--equipped and ready to go would be a more modern word usage.

But simple contract law could find the Bill of Rights untouchable as four of the states under the Articles of Confederation would only vote to dissolve to Articles in favor of the Constitution on the provision that those ten amendments be adopted. Altering the deal could possibly automatically revert us back to the Articles. Which would be a very interesting form of Organized Anarchy to our modern perceptions.




top topics



 
39
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join