It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Clinton’s Comments on 60 Minutes About Private Email Server Now Used Against Her in Court

page: 1
46
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:
+24 more 
posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 06:26 PM
link   
Poor Hillary Clinton just can't get away with anything can she.

She went on the 60 Minutes TV show last week and made some comments about her private computer system(s) used for government business and what do ya know .....

The Judicial Watch organization is using some of her comments to solidify their FOIA request(s) in court.

JW wants to "interview" her in connection with their FOIA requests.

So far that issue has been argued in court.

It's now or never.

One lie always leads to more cover-up lies doesn't it.

Clinton’s Comments on 60 Minutes About Private Email Server Now Used Against Her in Court


Hillary Clinton‘s comments on her use of a private server during last weekend’s 60 Minutes interview are now being used against her in a FOIA lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group. For the last several weeks, Judicial Watch has been seeking to depose Clinton about her use of a private email server in order to figure out if Freedom of Information Act requirements were violated.

Judicial Watch says new information was gleaned from an interview with CBS’ Scott Pelley including the fact that Clinton admitted that someone recommended she set up the server. The group wants to know who that someone was. They also contend her statement provides further reasoning for why she must be deposed under oath. Clinton’s lawyers say that issue is irrelevant to the lawsuit.


Can't hide from the Sun !!






edit on Jul-29-2016 by xuenchen because: mailed;out



+9 more 
posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 06:31 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

But, but, intent!

She had no damn intention of getting caught!


edit on 29-7-2016 by infolurker because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 06:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: xuenchen

But, but, intent!

She had no damn intention of getting caught!



She hates Guccifer.

And she never meant to make comments on 60 Minutes.




posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 06:39 PM
link   
The chickens are coming home to roost!!!

They should of went with Sanders!!



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 06:40 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

She will resist that "under oath", she was a tricky
dick lawyer herself so she knows that will be her end!

But yes, she should be deposed!



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 06:40 PM
link   
This woman is the definition of stupid...


+2 more 
posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 06:41 PM
link   
Good. Prison for the murderer.



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 07:07 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Oh, its a lawsuit. The verdict is a piece of paper.

I was waiting for a thread about her email to show up again. Have we noticed, the main stream media has washed that right out the window, covering her with roses and perfume during the convention. She is the DNC candidate.

Good luck making anything stick to the Teflon Blonde.



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 07:10 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

I dunno , ask Any Husband if his Wife ever Lies to them in Public , they will All Answer NO in Unison .
edit on 29-7-2016 by Zanti Misfit because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 07:23 PM
link   
I am not sure what this has to do with the lawsuit JudicialWatch might be reaching again.



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 07:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Pyle

LoL




posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 07:27 PM
link   
Yes finally its happening, not today, not tomorrow either, but yes one of these days, or maybe months, or years, but yes shes going to jail.



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 07:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: xuenchen

But, but, intent!

She had no damn intention of getting caught!



Starred.

Yeah I didn't intend to run that red light either but I got a ticket. I didn't know red meant stop


Ignorance of the law is not a defence in court. Breaking the law unintentionally is still breaking the law.



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 07:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: xuenchen

She will resist that "under oath", she was a tricky
dick lawyer herself so she knows that will be her end!

But yes, she should be deposed!


A lawyer who was terminated from the firm for lying and deceit. Damn , imagine that



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 08:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Nikola014
This woman is the definition of stupid...

You mean....careless

As stated by Comet

Hehe



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 08:58 PM
link   
Wait, what? I am so confused, what is happening now?



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 09:06 PM
link   

edit on 29-7-2016 by neo96 because: never mind



posted on Jul, 30 2016 @ 11:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: six67seven

originally posted by: Nikola014
This woman is the definition of stupid...

You mean....careless

As stated by Comet

Hehe


People slip up more as they grow older and are not as sharp.



posted on Jul, 30 2016 @ 06:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: starfoxxx
The chickens are coming home to roost!!!

They should of went with Sanders!!


Extra crispy! You want fries with that?




posted on Jul, 31 2016 @ 01:58 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen
Couldn't go one page without her Pep Squad to come rally her little army of record correctors.
Good post Xue. Of course, this is another one that'll get swept under the rug.




top topics



 
46
<<   2 >>

log in

join