It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama on the Economy

page: 2
10
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 07:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: amazing

NO we all suck out here,BUT HEY I'm happy YOU are good.
NICE to see 1 little guy who won, I say.


I know there's people hurting and I'm not saying all Obama's policies are were good. I hate the bailouts and I do know some people that are hurting personally. All I'm saying is that...

Most people are better off now then right before Obama took office.



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 08:27 PM
link   
a reply to: amazing

Nope.
I think I have explained why all over the forum.
AD INFINITUM.
edit on 28-7-2016 by cavtrooper7 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 09:10 PM
link   
Do forgets Barack Obama's greatest economic success "Cash for Clunkers". I bet that one gets left out of the history books.



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 10:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: amazing

Nope.
I think I have explained why all over the forum.
AD INFINITUM.


How do you explain all the success, financial well being, jobs, new houses...just good stuff happening to almost everyone I know all over the country. That's states as diverse as California, Nevada, Maryland, Florida, Oregon, Washington, Texas, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Utah, Arizona, New York and New Jersey. I'm not making it up.



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 10:18 PM
link   
a reply to: amazing

Minimal advances only,almost ANEMIC compared to prior adminstrations. HE WAS OBSTRUCTED almost at EVERY turn.
HE couldn't DO anything to advance the economy,just build a bigger government.
AND IF YOU THINK he's a better than Hillary...YOU DO know how I feel about her right and all we KNOW about the EMAILS and all?


Hillary Rodham Clinton and her husband are SAINTS compared to Obama.
YOU'LL find out later after his cover runs out of funds,he should be in Djibouti by then.

edit on 28-7-2016 by cavtrooper7 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 02:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: amazing

Minimal advances only,almost ANEMIC compared to prior adminstrations. HE WAS OBSTRUCTED almost at EVERY turn.
HE couldn't DO anything to advance the economy,just build a bigger government.
AND IF YOU THINK he's a better than Hillary...YOU DO know how I feel about her right and all we KNOW about the EMAILS and all?


Hillary Rodham Clinton and her husband are SAINTS compared to Obama.
YOU'LL find out later after his cover runs out of funds,he should be in Djibouti by then.


I still think we're in pretty good shape, only say it based on my experience-both personally and as a business owner.

I would also disagree that Obama is worse than Hillary. I think she's way worse.

I think we'll just have to disagree on those two points. No hard feelings.



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 02:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: syrinx high priest
what shape was the economy in when he took the job ?


Not nearly as craptacular as it is now.



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 03:30 PM
link   
a reply to: amazing

I barely worry about that trivia.
RIGHT now something that came to my mind that I was also wondering about.
IF I am indeed correct how bad will that harm those who are liberals?
WE have had our faces stomped in, but those who haven't WHAT will they do?
What if Donald actually does it (Not much will change in my opinion accept for the removal of intrusve ideas)



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 03:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: amazing

I barely worry about that trivia.
RIGHT now something that came to my mind that I was also wondering about.
IF I am indeed correct how bad will that harm those who are liberals?
WE have had our faces stomped in, but those who haven't WHAT will they do?
What if Donald actually does it (Not much will change in my opinion accept for the removal of intrusve ideas)


If your talking about Hillary and Trump, I think they're both almost the same. I think, despite the rhetoric, they'll have almost identical policies in place. Not to mention obstructionist congress for either.



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 04:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ohanka

originally posted by: syrinx high priest
what shape was the economy in when he took the job ?


Not nearly as craptacular as it is now.


show your work



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 04:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: syrinx high priest

OH some JERK stole all the money for his sh#t...see a pattern?
THE ONLY difference is ONE side can't keep secrets at ALL and the other are MASTERS of it,when it counts.


what does this have to do with how presidential policy effects the economy ?



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 04:33 PM
link   
a reply to: amazing

First Trump has to ferret out Obamas placements ,that will get him some points.
Maybe DISMANTLE a few agencies to pay for the military budget.



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 04:58 PM
link   
a reply to: syrinx high priest

YOU asked what happened to the economy BEFORE Obama,THAT is my response.
IF you don't get it , that's your issue.
I'M TIRED of teaching language to those who lack an education.
NOT that YOU indeed fall into that catagory ,I fear you must meet that criteria.



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 07:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: syrinx high priest

YOU asked what happened to the economy BEFORE Obama,THAT is my response.
IF you don't get it , that's your issue.
I'M TIRED of teaching language to those who lack an education.
NOT that YOU indeed fall into that catagory ,I fear you must meet that criteria.


You really misunderstood my question. If you don't have an answer, just say so.



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 08:03 PM
link   
a reply to: syrinx high priest

Understood.




top topics



 
10
<< 1   >>

log in

join