It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Huge fireball over Northern California

page: 3
31
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 01:09 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

I wonder how much valuable stuff it just FLOATING up there.




posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 01:12 AM
link   
tis space structure......a solid one at that....really flat entry, way up there, huh?!!!!



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 01:12 AM
link   
a reply to: cavtrooper7

Gobs and gobs.
But it's not floating. It's falling. Around and around the Earth.

edit on 7/28/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 01:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Tripnman

The videos really look like space junk.


I disagree, the fireball looks like space junk, the videos look like your atypical YouTube Videos and do not resemble fireballs whatsoever.



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 01:14 AM
link   
Found this at KSL.

"Patrick Wiggins, NASA/JPL solar system ambassador to Utah, confirmed for KSL that the object was a rocket body used in the launch of Yaogan Weixing-26, a Chinese satellite that was launched in December 2014. Wiggins said the rocket body was about 149 kilometers above Earth when it was over Utah."
edit on 28-7-2016 by favouriteslave because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 01:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Sublimecraft

I saw no youtube videos. I saw twitter videos.



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 01:20 AM
link   
a reply to: favouriteslave



Found this at KSL.

Problem. That was in February, 2015.


edit on 7/28/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 01:27 AM
link   
THIS ARTICLE is saying it was the Chinese Long March 7 booster re-entry.


Based on tracking data provided by the Joint Space Operations Center, McDowell said the Long March 7 rocket reentered about 9:40 p.m. over Utah.


Problem I have with that is that I saw it to my South West, traveling towards the South East. Utah is much further to the East. Can't say I agree that it entered over Utah. The time is about right, though I'd say it was closer to 9:30.


edit on 28-7-2016 by Tripnman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 01:33 AM
link   
so would debris hit new mexico? I'm curious in Dallas...don't cha know....he....he

edit on 28-7-2016 by GBP/JPY because: our new King.....He comes right after a nicely done fake one



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 01:34 AM
link   
a reply to: GBP/JPY
Not much debris, if any, from a booster stage would make it to the surface.



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 01:39 AM
link   
a reply to: Tripnman
So, a bit ahead of the guess.
www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 01:49 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Ah, so that CZ-7 re-entry listed there is the same one referenced in the article I just linked? Still strange that the ground track shown on the Aerospace site doesn't put it over us at all. Even the "uncertainty" tracks are off. Of course, since the entry was earlier than anticipated, these tracks might be for the planned time, not current time.

Okay, according to Aerospace:


Reentry Prediction Predicted Reentry Time: 28 July 2016 15:55 UTC ± 9 hours


My sighting was around 4:30 UTC (July 28), and their predicition model has a nine hour leeway. That would make it about right if it came in 9 hours early. Looks like you nailed it after all, Phage.

edit on 28-7-2016 by Tripnman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 01:55 AM
link   
a reply to: Tripnman
And 9 hours is about 6 orbits. The tracks of which do not appear on the chart. Move north two more orbits than shown in blue and viola!



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 01:57 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Indeed. I rest your case.
Still thrilled to have seen it, was quite the spectacle.


edit on 28-7-2016 by Tripnman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 02:03 AM
link   
a reply to: Tripnman

Lucky.

Not sure it's worth living in California though.



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 02:21 AM
link   
Chinese space station was out of control...?



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 02:22 AM
link   
a reply to: FlyingFox

It is.
But it's not this.



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 02:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

CAN U EMBELISH we cant all click links
sorry for the caps im typing outside in darkness and drinkung dont want to go back and change it



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 02:52 AM
link   
a reply to: DOCHOLIDAZE1

Keep reading.
It was a predicted reentry which occurred a bit earlier than predicted.



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 02:57 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

i did keep reading and see it was explaind were is the explosion?



new topics

top topics



 
31
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join