It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Wake the Heck UP, America!! GET ANGRY

page: 4
50
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 05:12 PM
link   
There are willing counterparts, probably even from military that would follow. Question is, who leads the opposition? Is there an opposition?

Ask the other team....I'm sure they'd tell you "false flag". Engineer something terrifying that drives your point (goal) home, then blame it on the enemy.

That usually does it.

edit on 28-7-2016 by Rosinitiate because: (no reason given)




posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 05:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: SpecialSauce
a reply to: LucidWarrior

What is it that makes people angry?


when they celebrate ignorance, and reject critical-thinking.



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 05:21 PM
link   
No, because trunp ia white, and bigoted, and I have personally seen a chan site practically worship trump and declare their intentions to install a white regime and slaughter off all the nonwhites...
I got all treehugger on his ass, prayed for his soul and whatnot. His claim was that trump has ebdorsed this, and the fact remains, he is a shameless bigot...
Even if it was just delusional rantings it is better to assume the wotst, and hope foe the best.eply to: MysticPearl



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 08:38 PM
link   
Believe me, I want nothing more than to vote third party. I'm certainly not voting for Trump or Clinton. And while anger - though certainly justified at the moment in my opinion - is not my chosen emotional state for responding to such crises, I AM profoundly concerned (and have been for decades.)

But answer me this.

I've been looking, all year, as I do every election. I've searched every list of candidates, read all their websites, examined all their voting records, and taken more "who should you vote for?" quizzes than I can count. Can anyone point me to a candidate who:



  • Displays none of the corruption Clinton has so blatantly
  • Embodies the social and economic changes Sanders espoused
  • Displays none of the (to me) terrifying tendencies and statements that Trump has made
  • Wants to reduce our foreign engagement in wars, BUT ALSO is willing to firmly and effectively (not in half measures) confront threats such as ISIS
  • May be personally opposed to abortion, but supports women's right to make that decision for themselves
  • Supports marriage equality and opposes discrimination against all members of the LGBTQ comunity
  • But ALSO does NOT stand where Clinton, Sanders, Jill Stein, and others do on gun control? (E.g. NO bans on specific firearms or ammunition?)
  • Is willing to thoroughly audit the Federal Reserve and our financial sector from top to bottom (to the extent that is reasonably doable at least)?
  • Has stated unequivocally that they intend to reverse the GWB era curtailments of the 4th amendment, which Obama in many cases merely perpetuated?
  • Will promise or has promised not to cut programs I rely on to survive such as HUD housing subsidies or disability (which I'm still trying to get on due to mental and physical issues) or MediCal (without which I would be completely and utterly doomed with regard to my physical health issues)? Eliminating waste in such programs WOULD be welcome, ensuring those on them truly need them, etc. But cutting them could destroy many people's lives, and would certainly at least profoundly worsen my own.


See the thing is, I'm as liberal as they come on some issues, but I also firmly believe both major parties are guilty of gradual curtailings of constitutional liberties, and despite my liberal leanings, and personal detest for guns, also refuse to vote for someone who will further curtail either the 2nd OR the 4th amendment. It's okay if you disagree with me that that has happened or will happen, or if you disagree with my list of requirements for a candidate I can support. I respect your beliefs... but that does me no good in terms of the exhortation to get angry and vote third party.

I just want a candidate who embodies all of the above, and does so in an honest, no nonsense, uncorrupt manner. I have yet to find one! Certainly neither Gary Johnson nor Jill Stein qualify. I know there are many, many others (again, I've done my due diligence,) but no matter what, I will be choosing the lesser of two evils. I would like to at least cut said "evil" (rhetorical evil) down a bit before deciding, but if I can't... then as always... my only option will be to write in, or abstain.

Again, feel free to disagree, but we all have to weigh our own consciences and that's where mine is right now. I respect the views and positions of those who don't feel the same.

Peace.



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 08:56 PM
link   
I don't really have anything to contribute...this thread just made
me think of a new meme....

Shillary Clinton or Donald Gump ...



...and here's something to ponder the next time you're in line
at the convenience store...

Try to reconcile the seemingly endless choices of gum you
are offered, with the "either or" choice of president you
are offered.

I guess gun is more imprtant



posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 09:57 PM
link   
Lol get angry and run up in that martial law



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 12:16 AM
link   
Lookiong from the outide...the people of the US are ... ...in a pretty bad situation. (I'm trying really hard to noet becoming insulting in my expression)

On one hand you have Trump; A guy youi already know is lying his teeth out. What he says now is onehundred procentage the opposite of a few years ago. If he gets elected he can basically do whatever he wants cause everybody is expecting him to lie anyhows, and he knows that.
Hillary Clinton on the other hand is an already tainted candidate. No doubt the sudden drop of the e-mail server case and the whole Syria/CIA link already taint her. It doesn't help that her becoming the democratic candidate has an at least dubious election.



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 01:18 AM
link   
a reply to: LucidWarrior

It's a wake-up call that isn't waking you up. And those who have been trying to warn you or wake you and others up to this form of brainwashing and manipulation of the way people think and who they look up to for solutions to their problems, are the ones who are called a brainwashing doomsaying cult for it by the very same ones that lend their support to these politicians (and encourage anyone who listens to them to ignore the following wise counsel from the bible regarding this subject; note that it's often people claiming to represent or follow the bible that are hypocritically doing this as well and making sure the masses or the flock just doesn't get it, keeping them ignorant and in figurative darkness).

Whom Do You Obey—God or Men?
In fact, just one year after Caiaphas’ downfall, Pilate himself was removed from office and was recalled to Rome to answer serious charges. ...As for the Jewish leaders who put their trust in Caesar, the Romans did take away ‘both their place and their nation.’

Who Is the Right Leader for Today?
Should you, then, trust them to guarantee yours? ... The Bible says: “Do not put your trust in nobles, nor in the son of earthling man, to whom no salvation belongs.

Can Science Bring Everlasting Life?
The Bible gives this wise counsel: “Do not put your trust in nobles, nor in the son of earthling man, to whom no salvation belongs.

Bridging the Gap—The Real Solution
History verifies the truthfulness of the Bible warning: “Do not put your trust in nobles, nor in the son of earthling man, to whom no salvation belongs.”

Can Humans Guarantee a Happy Future?

Trust Is Vital for a Happy Life

Earth’s Future—In Whose Hands?
The Bible answers: “Do not put your trust in nobles, nor in the son of earthling man, to whom no salvation belongs.”

Where Is the World Heading?
The Bible warns against looking to human institutions for the solution when it says: “Do not put your trust in nobles, nor in the son of earthling man, to whom no salvation belongs.”

Roots of Injustice
“Do not put your trust in nobles, . . .

Ancestor Worship

Identifying the Wild Beast and Its Mark
In contrast, the Bible urges us: “Do not put your trust in nobles, nor in the son of earthling man, to whom no salvation belongs.

Does Neutrality Hinder Christian Love?
The truth Jesus taught was not political theory. ...Is it not more loving to declare such a sure hope for the future than to encourage people to trust in men to provide a secure future?

Source: “Do Not Put Your Trust in Nobles” (WOL search)

Just a small selection of articles and the type of information people have been made figuratively allergic to (reluctant to investigate, by training and having their way of thinking formed by "the system of things" and "the spirit of the world", 2 other searchterms I recommend for the same library related to this subject of people putting their trust in the wrong types).
Most of what's in the videos below can also be found in an article in the library above I think but I can't quickly find it:


edit on 29-7-2016 by whereislogic because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 01:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: gosseyn
a reply to: Cygnis

Yeah but that's the problem, your constitution is just a piece a paper with words on it written centuries ago. Paper can be burnt, words can be twisted or totally ignored, and people from centuries ago can be portrayed as medieval retards and ridiculed, considered as merely folklore.

You shouldn't count on a piece of paper to protect you, you shouldn't wait to see if the words on that piece of paper give you the "right" to do something about the situation or not.

I don't know if you see the absurdity of the situation.


Without getting too far off topic, the Bible, Koran, and many other religeous books hold just as much power, if not more to many people. Those words in those books are older, in some cases, over 1,500 years older.

Words on paper, only have power if the people who read them believe in those words, much like a lot of us believe the constitutions gives us certain rights that the government wishes we didn't have.

True tho, the rights laid out are not given by the government, but people are dense, and sometimes things need to be laid out, because there are always others who with to deny people their basic, creator-granted rights.



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 01:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: AncientShade
Lookiong from the outide...the people of the US are ... ...in a pretty bad situation. (I'm trying really hard to noet becoming insulting in my expression)

On one hand you have Trump; A guy youi already know is lying his teeth out. What he says now is onehundred procentage the opposite of a few years ago. If he gets elected he can basically do whatever he wants cause everybody is expecting him to lie anyhows, and he knows that.
Hillary Clinton on the other hand is an already tainted candidate. No doubt the sudden drop of the e-mail server case and the whole Syria/CIA link already taint her. It doesn't help that her becoming the democratic candidate has an at least dubious election.


Ahh the whole thing is a damn mess.

I don't know about the rest of the people in my country, but I no longer believe what politicians say.

Finding a politician that doesn't lie through their teeth, is like finding water on the sun.



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 03:23 AM
link   
a reply to: LucidWarrior

"Making a white America"

Are you joking? You act as if you are all above everything that is going on, and yet you immediately rush to the race baiting identity politics card.

That statement alone invalidates everything else that you said, as it shows exactly what type of propaganda you consume.

Did you buy a Hillary woman card? They are still on sale.



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 08:59 AM
link   
Actually, I am mad as hell and will not take it any more. I am not deluded to think that anyone other than a member of the two party system can win the election this year, but neither will I vote for the lessor two evils. No matter what, I will not be bullied into voting for Hillary. That's not much of a distinction, but its such a disgrace that America will not have a chance to have Bernie run the show, someone who truly would have worked hard to make our country a better place for everyone.



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 10:10 AM
link   
It seems to me getting rid of the thousand or so people trying to take over the planet would be the easiest solution.



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 11:20 AM
link   
a reply to: LucidWarrior

Make America white again? You know im sick and tired of hearing this false rhetoric with no evidence against trump.

Just because liberals and the mostly democratic controlled media spout this BS you believe it but try to come off as enlightened in your OP.

Please show me a video of Trump saying this. Show me a video or audio tape of him playing golf or having a few beers with white supremacists. Show me him preaching about bringing America back to the pre civil rights era.

No one has shown or proved the man is racist yet. Please put forth your HARD evidence and stop spouting worthless conjecture spoon fed to you by a biased media.
edit on 29-7-2016 by ker2010 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 04:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
HOW many warnings YOU got?

I don't understand your question?



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 04:31 PM
link   
a reply to: LucidWarrior

I got a WARNING and scared the SH#T out of Buzzywigs when I kind of took off my civilian mask,she PMed me worrying about my sanity.
I am reasonably sure I DO fit the bill...and then some...



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 04:41 PM
link   
a reply to: LucidWarrior

Trump wants to slaughter all non-whites?

Provide a source or I'm flagging you for intentional race baiting.



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 05:49 PM
link   
a reply to: MysticPearl
Firstly, I never said trump said it. I said somebody else did. And I did explicitly admit it might just be the delusional ravings of an obviously insane person and its not true, but again I ask, if it is? He's got all sorts of white supremacists following him.

Now, imagine you're trump for a split second in this specific scenario. On the one hand, you're not secretly a white supremacist. So, you'd try to do all you could to not take the endorsement. On the other hand you are 'secretly' a white supremacist.(Again, he's not exactly hiding it in his actions and statements, but) You cant just come out and say 'Yeah, white supremacy' because then you'd lose all of the people that aren't white supremacist, and you can't have that, because then no presidency. So you'd 'pretend' like you didn't want the white supremacists support, and only accept it grudgingly.

On the outside, both scenarios look exactly the same, so long as trumps got a poker face. Which, let's face it, he is a businessman. And, again, he has never openly said as much, but he hasn't exactly hid his views about people of a different race either.

So, this from a chan site called 8ch. It used to be okay, but now there's a bunch of white supremacists there that are all voting for trump making it #. Some Anon in a Webm thread posted the following in reply to the op which had video and picture of a cars spoiler completely randomly with no leadup.

Cut out the initial confrontation. Merely ask the question my daughter is mixed race [mudshark] and she can't live in this country? The point is simple, Britain was a white country, has been a white country for thousands of years and is now being invaded, it will ultimately become a white country again just as the US will become predominately white again. Our continent has stared down much greater threats and armies then what these #skins can hope to bear.
There was no discussion here, she shouted racists as loud as she could and the people responded to that very virtue signal catcalling. They are sheep, trained monkeys responding to cues they have been taught since school. They have been taught that pride in ones race is racist.
What do you think we'll do to your mixed #skin child once we get in power exactly? She'll become second class citizen at best ineligible to breed and forcibly sterilized. Worst, she'll be put in a camp and cornered off from society, a step further would be that if she is actually politically active for her viewpoint, we'll throw her our a helicopter mid flight to set an example to her entire social circle.
In my country alone allot of our active organizations have been collecting intell on thousands of people who openly profess their socialist, communist bull# drivel. They'll be the one's who will be visited first after a regime change. After control of governmental intelligence branches is established, their data will be used to find more of them.
This is the future they have chosen, their gradual belief in Marxist lies will come around to bite them and the sheep will casually follow the flock as if nothing had happened as the change will be gradual and the disappearance of these people will not be reported.
AVE

It's filthy, it's disgusting, and theres a chance it could be true. I got all treehugger on his ass and preached to him. Lol. I'd link my reply but it doesn't really belong here.



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 06:41 PM
link   
a reply to: LucidWarrior

Does it ever occur to you that they may WANT civil unrest, as an excuse to install a draconian police state? Everything that has been happening lately makes sense if you plug in that motive. Not just here but in Europe. Getting angry is not the solution to this.



posted on Jul, 29 2016 @ 06:50 PM
link   
I got None.a reply to: cavtrooper7




top topics



 
50
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join