It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: veracity
You DO know that he does not write his speeches...right? And you also know that he will say anything to get your support and vote.
What he says is not necessarily what he thinks or will do. He is very good at convincing people. This is a game to him, all he wants is to win and lying does not bother his conscious at all.
originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
originally posted by: veracity
You DO know that he does not write his speeches...right? And you also know that he will say anything to get your support and vote.
What he says is not necessarily what he thinks or will do. He is very good at convincing people. This is a game to him, all he wants is to win and lying does not bother his conscious at all.
Hmmm...lets try that another way:
"You DO know that she does not write her speeches...right? And you also know that she will say anything to get your support and vote. What she says is not necessarily what he thinks or will do. She is very good at convincing people. This is a game to her, all she wants is to win and lying does not bother her conscious at all."
Now...what was your point?
originally posted by: gladtobehere
a reply to: bbarkow
Thats interesting, I got a distinctly different impression after watching the RNC.
From what I could gather, the Trump message is "vote for me because Hillary sucks" and be VERY scared of evil Brown people.
There was very little substance.
We should assume and trust that Trump will "make America great again".
How is anyone's guess.
originally posted by: veracity
You DO know that he does not write his speeches...right? And you also know that he will say anything to get your support and vote.
What he says is not necessarily what he thinks or will do. He is very good at convincing people. This is a game to him, all he wants is to win and lying does not bother his conscious at all.
This Trump guy is growing on me
Royal connection! Donald Trump is distant cousin of notorious Richard III, it is revealed...and he's ALSO related to Hillary Clinton
MyHeritage.com claims that Trump and Hillary Clinton are direct descendants of the 14th century 1st Duke of Lancaster, John of Gaunt Gaunt, who died in 1399, was Richard III's great-great uncle
Therefore, the high-flying political pair are related to Shakespeare's contemptible bunch-back'd toad - as well as each other (19th cousins)
The Republican chairman of a powerful congressional committee said Thursday that he will ask the FBI for a new criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton's classified email scandal, focusing on the possibility that she perjured herself in sworn testimony to Congress.
Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, asked FBI Director James Comey whether he had cause to charge her for lying in a statement she made to Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan during a 2015 hearing on the 2012 Benghazi terror attack.
'There was nothing marked classified on my emails, either sent or received,' Clinton said at the time.
Comey said in a hearing Thursday that the FBI had not investigated whether that statement was true, despite finding three documents with classification markings among the messages on her private server.
'Not to my knowledge. I don't think there's been a [criminal] referral from Congress,' Comey said.
Asked if he needed one, Comey told Chaffetz: '[I] sure do.'
'You'll have one,' said Chaffetz. 'You'll have one in the next few hours.'
Under questioning from South Carolina Rep. Trey Gowdy, Comey agreed that 'there was classified information' on Clinton's homebrew server, and that Clinton's early denials in that regard were false.
'There was classified material emailed,' he said matter-of-factly.
Asked whether it was accurate that none of those materials were 'marked' classified when Clinton sent or received them, Comey said: 'That's not true.'
'There were a small number of portion markings on, I think, three of the documents,' he said.
Later in the hearing he was asked directly what offense lying under oath would be and what punishment it could lead to.
'Perjury,' he replied. 'Felony. I can't remember precisely... years in prison.'
originally posted by: DupontDeux
a reply to: bbarkow
I prefer Trump more and more.
But I am not sure if I like him more and more .. or if I like him less and less and just like Hillary MORE less and less.
originally posted by: all2human
There should be a way to cancel the whole thing ,to postpone the election based on the fact neither candidate is competent, nor represent true American values.
Even a threat to national security
I feel sorry for my American brothers.
Robert Kovacev, a Washington D.C. based attorney: “I would absolutely advise a client not to release returns under audit to the public.
Robert Mckenzie, a Chicago based attorney: “I would advise my client that there could be huge risks in releasing complex returns during an audit. Instead of having just an IRS agent review the return it now would be reviewed by thousands of tax experts.
Robert Barnes, a Los Angeles based attorney:
“I see some of my colleagues would tell their clients to release their tax returns to the public during an audit. Ask them to name a single client they actually gave that advice to. I think that would be legal malpractice, and would recommend their clients sue them if they gave that advice. I advise my clients (hundreds over the years who actually experience an IRS inquiry) to NEVER release their tax returns while an audit is going on. I am certain Mr. Trump’s lawyers, very capable and well-respected in this field, have advised him not to disclose his tax returns during the audit. There are many reasons for this.
Lester Weingarten, New York City based accountant:
“If his return is under audit, I would advise not to release it to the public as there could be an embarrassing upward adjustment or they could “bless” the return by not making any changes which would be an affirmation of the accuracy of the return (or they could make a highly unlikely downward adjustment). Either way, it would not be beneficial to release the return until all was settled.