It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Is the LHC responsible for worldwide earthquakes?

page: 4
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in


posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 04:11 PM
a reply to: Discotech

exactly this

posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 05:32 PM

originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: nobunaga
If the LHC is responsible for earthquakes, then you hitting a nail with a hammer is responsible for continental drifts.

Just as silly as LHC doom porn.

Scrat (an acorn-obsessed saber-toothed squirrel) was responsible for the separation of the continents, which divided Pangaea, the singular landmass, into various continents.

posted on Jul, 28 2016 @ 07:59 PM

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: 3danimator2014

So human beings can't effect faults and earthquakes.

Your so upset by a past argument you aren't even thinking strait.

Answer me this does the usgs consider human beings responsible for any earthquakes?

Can you read

We can set up a string of nuclear weapons on an active fault with potential energy and alter the time it was going to go.

Is that better can you understand that?

I fully admit any core discussion is theoretical. Is that better.

However volcanoes and faults are a different story. They have potential energy closer to the surface. They can be effected either directly or indirectly by percussion and theoretically ultra low frequencies.

Causing small localised tremors is a vastly different thing to say, setting off the San Andreas fault, which sounds to me the sort of thing you are talking about. And in those large scale cases, no, i dont believe that we could ever achieve much.

Faults may have potential energy, but the force it takes to release that is beyond us currently in my opinion.

<< 1  2  3   >>

log in