It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
All charges have been dismissed against the pro-life activists indicted in Texas for their involvement in the making of undercover videos about Planned Parenthood.
The Houston Chronicle reports the Harris County District Attorney’s Office has dismissed all charges against the two activist filmmakers, David Daleiden, 27, and Sandra Merritt, 63. As LawNewz.com reported in January, a grand jury empaneled to investigate misconduct by officials at Planned Parenthood instead decided to flip the script, returning indictments against Daleiden and Merritt. Both were charged with second degree felony tampering with a governmental record for allegedly using fake identification cards to hide their real identities when making the videos. Daleiden was also charged with a misdemeanor for allegedly attempting to purchase human organs.
originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
a reply to: xuenchen
Now, are planned parenthood ceo's and baby parts salesmen going to be charged with selling organs at a profit?
Cheers - Dave
originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
a reply to: xuenchen
Now, are planned parenthood ceo's and baby parts salesmen going to be charged with selling organs at a profit?
Cheers - Dave
It's no shock that Texas would let antiabortionist walk free.
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: buster2010
It's no shock that Texas would let antiabortionist walk free.
I am pretty sure the term is pro-life not anti-abortionist. I am sure that pro-choice people don't want to be stigmatized with anti-life as their position.
originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
Honest question, dosent the article say that both will still have charges brought against them, just different ones?
I might have read that wrong.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
Honest question, dosent the article say that both will still have charges brought against them, just different ones?
I might have read that wrong.
Not seeing it.
What part do you think says that?
originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: dukeofjive696969
Honest question, dosent the article say that both will still have charges brought against them, just different ones?
I might have read that wrong.
Not seeing it.
What part do you think says that?
returning indictments part, does that mean there charges where droped or changed, thats the part where my poor understanding of english lets me wonder.