It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: imsoconfused
a reply to: DerBeobachter
And we can´t wipe them out??? We can´t send wave after wave of bombers like the allies did back in 1945? We can´t invade that piece of sand to clean it up?
Sure we could, in several days. The "IS" uses the same banksterinstitutions for their deals like the rest of the world does. There is no special "IS" bank, from the "IS" for the "IS", that acts worldwide, for example. It would be easy to send no more money into that region, via those banksters. But the banksters want profits, they deal even with the "devil", if they aren´t the "devil" themselves. Cut the "IS"of from anything, destroy the water plants, the powerplants, destroy every antenna, cut them from the internet...
Why doesn't Russia send in wave after wave and clean it up?
Because they are doing as Syria requested, provide direct support as needed. Unlike NATO attack aircraft and special forces that have to cross borders in violation of International law.
So they are not trying to defeat ISIS they are just trying to protect Syria and their interests there right?
originally posted by: awareness10
originally posted by: imsoconfused
originally posted by: awareness10
a reply to: imsoconfused
Because 'Russia' didn't create Isis. John McCain comes to mind... and so do a few others...
But they are the saviors. So then they are involved too? Otherwise why not stop it with there bad selfs.
I didn't call anyone a Saviour, did you? Why should they be the only ones to do that, while the US gov is sitting on their back side having had a hand in the whole damn thing? Im seeing a pattern here with this behaviour. It's been ongoing with more than just Syria. I think you're aware of that though, right?
If i remember correctly.
Didn't the US leave masses of weapons and vehicles in the ME when they pulled out of Afghanistan?
originally posted by: imsoconfused
originally posted by: awareness10
originally posted by: imsoconfused
originally posted by: awareness10
a reply to: imsoconfused
Because 'Russia' didn't create Isis. John McCain comes to mind... and so do a few others...
But they are the saviors. So then they are involved too? Otherwise why not stop it with there bad selfs.
I didn't call anyone a Saviour, did you? Why should they be the only ones to do that, while the US gov is sitting on their back side having had a hand in the whole damn thing? Im seeing a pattern here with this behaviour. It's been ongoing with more than just Syria. I think you're aware of that though, right?
They are not doing anything but protecting Syria.
If ISIS retreated out of Syria and gave up on Assad. Would Russia still be in the fight.
Since the failed coup attempt in Turkey of July 15 there has been much speculation in western media that it in fact was all engineered by President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan to provide him with the pretext to impose emergency rule and to jail any and all opposition to his rule. At this point evidence still suggests that that was not at all the case. Rather, as I wrote at the time when it was clear the coup attempt was collapsing, it was a coup initiated by the CIA acting through their primary asset inside Turkey, the networks of their fugitive Turkish asset Fethullah Gülen. When we examine more closely “what” is Fethullah Gülen he is anything but the grandfatherly image of a 75-year-old soft-spoken Islamic moderate, scholar and Imam. His networks have been called the most dangerous in Germany by Islamic experts and have been banned in several Central Asian countries. Now, too, in Turkey. What’s becoming clear is that the failed coup was in fact a dry-run, a dress rehearsal by Gülen’s controllers in Langley to see how Erdogan would react, in order to recalibrate and prepare for a more serious attempt in the future. Washington was not at all happy with the foreign policy turn of Erdoğan turning to reconcile with Russia and possibly also with Syria’s Assad. journal-neo.org...
originally posted by: awareness10
originally posted by: imsoconfused
originally posted by: awareness10
originally posted by: imsoconfused
originally posted by: awareness10
a reply to: imsoconfused
Because 'Russia' didn't create Isis. John McCain comes to mind... and so do a few others...
But they are the saviors. So then they are involved too? Otherwise why not stop it with there bad selfs.
I didn't call anyone a Saviour, did you? Why should they be the only ones to do that, while the US gov is sitting on their back side having had a hand in the whole damn thing? Im seeing a pattern here with this behaviour. It's been ongoing with more than just Syria. I think you're aware of that though, right?
They are not doing anything but protecting Syria.
If ISIS retreated out of Syria and gave up on Assad. Would Russia still be in the fight.
yes i believe he would. Because ISIS is a serious threat the that part of the world. Russia will always defend it's Allies and it's Borders. Clearly, ISIS is a threat to the entire Region thanks the Zion Gods who want a planet take over.
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: awareness10
This latest piece at NEO is a good historical summary that has the dot's ..worth reading for sure .
Since the failed coup attempt in Turkey of July 15 there has been much speculation in western media that it in fact was all engineered by President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan to provide him with the pretext to impose emergency rule and to jail any and all opposition to his rule. At this point evidence still suggests that that was not at all the case. Rather, as I wrote at the time when it was clear the coup attempt was collapsing, it was a coup initiated by the CIA acting through their primary asset inside Turkey, the networks of their fugitive Turkish asset Fethullah Gülen. When we examine more closely “what” is Fethullah Gülen he is anything but the grandfatherly image of a 75-year-old soft-spoken Islamic moderate, scholar and Imam. His networks have been called the most dangerous in Germany by Islamic experts and have been banned in several Central Asian countries. Now, too, in Turkey. What’s becoming clear is that the failed coup was in fact a dry-run, a dress rehearsal by Gülen’s controllers in Langley to see how Erdogan would react, in order to recalibrate and prepare for a more serious attempt in the future. Washington was not at all happy with the foreign policy turn of Erdoğan turning to reconcile with Russia and possibly also with Syria’s Assad. journal-neo.org...
Thanks we know the official story. That materiel wasn't abandoned, it was delivered. Just like this caravan of trucks crossing the Iraq border into Syria...
originally posted by: imsoconfused
originally posted by: awareness10
originally posted by: imsoconfused
originally posted by: awareness10
originally posted by: imsoconfused
originally posted by: awareness10
a reply to: imsoconfused
Because 'Russia' didn't create Isis. John McCain comes to mind... and so do a few others...
But they are the saviors. So then they are involved too? Otherwise why not stop it with there bad selfs.
I didn't call anyone a Saviour, did you? Why should they be the only ones to do that, while the US gov is sitting on their back side having had a hand in the whole damn thing? Im seeing a pattern here with this behaviour. It's been ongoing with more than just Syria. I think you're aware of that though, right?
They are not doing anything but protecting Syria.
If ISIS retreated out of Syria and gave up on Assad. Would Russia still be in the fight.
yes i believe he would. Because ISIS is a serious threat the that part of the world. Russia will always defend it's Allies and it's Borders. Clearly, ISIS is a threat to the entire Region thanks the Zion Gods who want a planet take over.
I disagree. Russia only cares about Russia just like the West only cares about the West and China only cares about China.
originally posted by: Gin
a reply to: reldra
Sadly US's drone targeting on their strikes is a bit off, seems to be hitting everything else that's not ISIS.
Their systems need improvement.
An airstrike in Syria killed entire families instead of ISIS fighters
also where are the isis flags.
that looks to be a MI-24, to big to be a apache.
Are you suggesting the Russians are behind ISIS?