It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Julian Assange: My Next Leak Will Ensure Hillary’s Arrest

page: 18
104
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 3 2016 @ 07:50 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust


Assange also says that according to U.S. election laws, Bernie Sanders will replace Hillary on the November 8th ballot.


If Assange's evidence against Hillary is as good as his knowledge of United States election law, Hillary has nothing to worry about.




posted on Sep, 4 2016 @ 06:23 AM
link   
Assange has built this up to a fever pitch and made some big claims. His evidence will have to be mighty impressive. The Hillbots will then blame Putin for hacking information on Hillary. Honestly, unless Hillary sold the nuclear codes to a foreign agent or killed someone on the Capital steps, she'll skate off with no problems. She must have had dirt on Comey and Lynch to avoid her arrest this far.



posted on Sep, 7 2016 @ 09:50 PM
link   
Hillary Rodham-Clinton can't be arrested, because she's "too big to fail". But her supporters with good mental balance will reassess their support for Hillary Clinton during the upcoming series of Wiki-leaks Clinton/DNC e-mail dumps.

From 9.6.2016 Interview: "“The first batch is coming reasonably soon,” Assange said. “We’re quite confident about it now. We might put out some teasers as early as next week, or the week after.”

Assange didn’t give specifics about what would be in the leak, but has promised that WikiLeaks would release documents on the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee that would have a significant impact on the looming general election.""

Source: www.foxnews.com...



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 03:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
Hillary Rodham-Clinton can't be arrested, because she's "too big to fail". But her supporters with good mental balance will reassess their support for Hillary Clinton during the upcoming series of Wiki-leaks Clinton/DNC e-mail dumps.


You also have to be convicted of a crime, but don't let that stand in the way of paranoia.


From 9.6.2016 Interview: "“The first batch is coming reasonably soon,” Assange said. “We’re quite confident about it now. We might put out some teasers as early as next week, or the week after.”

Assange didn’t give specifics about what would be in the leak, but has promised that WikiLeaks would release documents on the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee that would have a significant impact on the looming general election.""

Source: www.foxnews.com...


The mere fact that you are all waiting desperately for someone to have something that might hurt Clinton shows how little faith you have in Trump. I know whatever Julian eventual decides to release will be overwhelmingly disappointing to you, but go ahead and still create a load of new threads about it.



posted on Sep, 8 2016 @ 08:16 AM
link   
In Assange's latest interview on Hannity, he stated HRC would most likely be elected. Shows he doesn't have too much faith in his 'incriminating evidence'. Since he's anti-HRC, why wait and send out teasers? If he has as much dislike against HRC as he claims, he would be slamming the hard and fast evidence to annihilate her chance of being elected. I also agree with many here, he's all hype and no harm.



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 12:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: carewemust
Hillary Rodham-Clinton can't be arrested, because she's "too big to fail". But her supporters with good mental balance will reassess their support for Hillary Clinton during the upcoming series of Wiki-leaks Clinton/DNC e-mail dumps.


You also have to be convicted of a crime, but don't let that stand in the way of paranoia.


From 9.6.2016 Interview: "“The first batch is coming reasonably soon,” Assange said. “We’re quite confident about it now. We might put out some teasers as early as next week, or the week after.”

Assange didn’t give specifics about what would be in the leak, but has promised that WikiLeaks would release documents on the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee that would have a significant impact on the looming general election.""

Source: www.foxnews.com...


The mere fact that you are all waiting desperately for someone to have something that might hurt Clinton shows how little faith you have in Trump. I know whatever Julian eventual decides to release will be overwhelmingly disappointing to you, but go ahead and still create a load of new threads about it.


Are you serious? If you or I did a tenth of what she did we'd be in jail for decades. There ARE people in jail that did less than she did handling classified material. She's just a well connected corrupt official. It's obvious. If you're on ATS I'd have thought you'd be aware of that already.



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 12:51 AM
link   
a reply to: SudoNim

That's a clever angle you present, but its not a lack of faith in Trump. It's understanding that Americans watch TV several hours a day. Most TV media is against Donald Trump and Pro-Hillary.

Therefore, Trump supporters have to not only show support for Donald, but find and exploit any possible weakness of his opponent, Hillary.

Hopefully working both strategies together will bring a Donald Trump victory on November 8th.



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 01:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: carewemust
Hillary Rodham-Clinton can't be arrested, because she's "too big to fail". But her supporters with good mental balance will reassess their support for Hillary Clinton during the upcoming series of Wiki-leaks Clinton/DNC e-mail dumps.


You also have to be convicted of a crime, but don't let that stand in the way of paranoia.


From 9.6.2016 Interview: "“The first batch is coming reasonably soon,” Assange said. “We’re quite confident about it now. We might put out some teasers as early as next week, or the week after.”

Assange didn’t give specifics about what would be in the leak, but has promised that WikiLeaks would release documents on the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee that would have a significant impact on the looming general election.""

Source: www.foxnews.com...


The mere fact that you are all waiting desperately for someone to have something that might hurt Clinton shows how little faith you have in Trump. I know whatever Julian eventual decides to release will be overwhelmingly disappointing to you, but go ahead and still create a load of new threads about it.


It isn't a lack of faith in Trump at all. It's the worry that with Obama helping Hillary in every way including illegal ones that ignore all the laws of this country so she avoids prosecution like everyone else faces in the same circumstances, but the voting fraud just like Obama enjoyed with Mafia influence in Chicago for his senate seat. That same voting fraud was evident also when Romney lost in all republican districts here and there, etc. etc. But since this didn't seem to hurt your candidate it's ignored, so don't let historical facts get in your way any. Everything is okay even criminality as far as liberals are concerned which was 100 percent proven with the DNC email hack that showed it as plain as day.



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 02:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: thepixelpusher

Are you serious? If you or I did a tenth of what she did we'd be in jail for decades. There ARE people in jail that did less than she did handling classified material. She's just a well connected corrupt official. It's obvious. If you're on ATS I'd have thought you'd be aware of that already.


And there ARE people who've done the same and more and not gone to jail. You just won't hear about them.

She's as corrupt as Trump is and both are as corrupt as most politicians. The ones who aren't corrupt don't make it this far. That's the sad truth.



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 02:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: SudoNim

That's a clever angle you present, but its not a lack of faith in Trump. It's understanding that Americans watch TV several hours a day. Most TV media is against Donald Trump and Pro-Hillary.

Therefore, Trump supporters have to not only show support for Donald, but find and exploit any possible weakness of his opponent, Hillary.

Hopefully working both strategies together will bring a Donald Trump victory on November 8th.



So how does all these threads about Hillary's health, ear, cough, dress, hair, emails etc help the Americans watching TV make a better decision?

Also I'd argue that for every thread created to exploit a weakness in Hillary is negated by the pointless slanderous ones.

All the threads are based on rumour and hope. "I hope someone else finds some emails that might incriminate Hillar"... "Clinton has a weird ear and cough!"

How do these help?
Where are the threads questioning Hillary's policies?
I've yet to find an anti-Hillary or pro-Trump supporter who can talk policies and isn't just posting meme's, one-liners and back-slapping comments. I'd say you are playing into Hillary's hands and fitting the Trump supporter stereotype of simple-minded, one-dimensional and slanderous puppets.

But hey, just my thoughts.



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 02:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: thepixelpusher

Are you serious? If you or I did a tenth of what she did we'd be in jail for decades. There ARE people in jail that did less than she did handling classified material. She's just a well connected corrupt official. It's obvious. If you're on ATS I'd have thought you'd be aware of that already.


And there ARE people who've done the same and more and not gone to jail. You just won't hear about them.

She's as corrupt as Trump is and both are as corrupt as most politicians. The ones who aren't corrupt don't make it this far. That's the sad truth.


How is this about Trump? So sad you buy into corruption as a sign of a leader when it's the opposite. Corrupt empires fall. That's recorded history and fact. Clinton is no leader.



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 03:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
It isn't a lack of faith in Trump at all. It's the worry that with Obama helping Hillary in every way including illegal ones that ignore all the laws of this country so she avoids prosecution like everyone else faces in the same circumstances, but the voting fraud just like Obama enjoyed with Mafia influence in Chicago for his senate seat. That same voting fraud was evident also when Romney lost in all republican districts here and there, etc. etc. But since this didn't seem to hurt your candidate it's ignored, so don't let historical facts get in your way any. Everything is okay even criminality as far as liberals are concerned which was 100 percent proven with the DNC email hack that showed it as plain as day.


Yep, because Trump has no mafia connection whatsoever right?

That "plain-as-day" fraud just looks like sour grapes.

An easy excuse for why you think Trump will lose, ignoring his terrible policies, potentially sexist, feminist, hate-inducing speeches. Forgetting his lies, his crimes, his avoidance to reveal his taxes. His "wall" which is financially devastating to maintain. His child-like demeanour which seemingly has to be micro-managed to stop him throwing tantrums. His ability to split, divide and insult different cultures, political parties and foreign countries. His awful relationship with the media which he would have to endure through his Presidential career if elected. His obsession with nuclear weapons and his indication that he would like to "carpet-bomb" civilian areas and supporting the use of war-crimes. His "doctors" health report which he clearly... hysterically forged. His age which would make him the oldest(I think?) President ever. His past history of abuse to women and racism. His team made up of golfing buddies and air-heads who flip-flop from sarcasm to serious back to apology. His affiliation with Putin and now Farage, two of the most hated, controversial and horrible people on the planet. A Presidential candidate who admits to crowds he'd love to punch a rival supporter in the face, who refuses to elaborate on his policies when questioned. A man with a complete obsession with China. A candidate who is actually making money from his own campaign. A man whose idea of "Charity donation" is actually bribing people not to investigate him.

And I know i know, your responses will be Hillary, Hillary, Hillary. But that right there / is YOUR candidate. And i'm not talking to the people who just post in the serious political discussions, its the ones who actively defend Trump and take part in slander against Hillary. You are hurting your own campaign.

If Trump could just display a modicum of understanding of how the economy works, realise the importance of foreign affairs and write some feasibly and sensible policies instead of catchphrases and ridiculous ones such as the wall. He would stand a chance. If he could match Hillary on this side of the Presidential race then it would be close.

I mean hell, Trumps trying it. He's back on auto cue, he's trying to change.(whether that's his choice or not remains to be seen) He's keeping his mouth shut. Nodding along. He may have completely gone back on some of his promises that he duped his supporters with, but its been realised that he can't just rely on those simple folk to win.

Whereas you on here, and you know who i'm talking about, continue to act like the old-Trump. Childish meme's, group spamming one-line lol's in threads in the hope your fellow Trumpers will flood you with stars for posting "Shillary" and then suddenly all disappearing when its revealed the OP was wrong or tricked.

I mean what a great example do we have when someone who posts...


originally posted by: iTruthSeeker
Let me see what Hilary thinks about this hold on....





..get's 40+ stars. That pointless, meaningless and content-absence post is consider star worthy by 40+ individuals.

It's saddening.



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 03:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
How is this about Trump?


Haha pot and kettle comes to mind.


So sad you buy into corruption as a sign of a leader when it's the opposite. Corrupt empires fall. That's recorded history and fact. Clinton is no leader.


Remind me how many of Trumps business's have gone bankrupt again. If you don't think Trump is corrupt as much as the next politician then I don't think any amount of reasonable discussion is going to help you.



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 03:18 AM
link   
If she did drop out, I'd say John Kerry is probably the chosen one for the Democrats.

There was a news article recently discussing his great friendship with the Minister Sergei Lavrov and how comfortable it all looked.

It seemed odd, for mainstream media to be talk like that about Russia. It stood out.


.. and thinking more about it, Obama's getting hammered in the media for the Iran agreement, its all the focus is on. Yet, Kerry and Russia always have a positive spin to it... .... Kerry's not even mentioned in the Iran deal.



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 03:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
How is this about Trump?


Haha pot and kettle comes to mind.


So sad you buy into corruption as a sign of a leader when it's the opposite. Corrupt empires fall. That's recorded history and fact. Clinton is no leader.


Remind me how many of Trumps business's have gone bankrupt again. If you don't think Trump is corrupt as much as the next politician then I don't think any amount of reasonable discussion is going to help you.


Ha ha you can't stick to the facts at hand, but reply by attacking me instead. Shows a weak hand on your part.



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 03:31 AM
link   
Despite one's personal feelings about Assange as a person, there's no denying that Wikileaks usually delivers on the goods. And no matter how you feel about the methodology of accessing politician's and government's data (which should be 100% transparent in the first place) once it's on the Internet it's public domain and should be spread to the people freely and liberally.

These people are criminals. Hillary especially, but on a broader scale, the US government. If Wikileaks can produce evidence of criminal misdeed I say bravo. If there's evidence on a mail server or a database somewhere that can clearly paint her for the criminal she is I hope it gets leaked. If the justice system wants to play dumb then they are just as criminal as the person committing crimes. With evidence in the public domain it's a lot easier to bring justice to high profile people like politicians. Furthermore without Wikileaks a lot of information regarding Benghazi, for example, or war crimes like documented civilian murders, would have never seen the light of day specifically because the US Government can dictate when and why they choose to honor FOIA requests, and the most egregious acts of those in power would never be seen by the public.

So if you value freedom and justice and are opposed to tyranny: root for Assange. Not because you think he is a good person, but because you value truth. And if you support leakers, or want to see the criminals who try to rule through back room dealings brought to justice you can't be picky about how the information gets out. You either support it, or you support criminal activities within our own government.



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 03:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: thepixelpusher

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
How is this about Trump?


Haha pot and kettle comes to mind.


So sad you buy into corruption as a sign of a leader when it's the opposite. Corrupt empires fall. That's recorded history and fact. Clinton is no leader.


Remind me how many of Trumps business's have gone bankrupt again. If you don't think Trump is corrupt as much as the next politician then I don't think any amount of reasonable discussion is going to help you.


Ha ha you can't stick to the facts at hand, but reply by attacking me instead. Shows a weak hand on your part.


Sorry what facts? And where did I attack you?

Please quote them from your post because one of us doesn't know the definition of "attack" and "facts" and i'd like to find out who.



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 03:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: AnonyMason
Despite one's personal feelings about Assange as a person, there's no denying that Wikileaks usually delivers on the goods. And no matter how you feel about the methodology of accessing politician's and government's data (which should be 100% transparent in the first place) once it's on the Internet it's public domain and should be spread to the people freely and liberally.

These people are criminals. Hillary especially, but on a broader scale, the US government. If Wikileaks can produce evidence of criminal misdeed I say bravo. If there's evidence on a mail server or a database somewhere that can clearly paint her for the criminal she is I hope it gets leaked. If the justice system wants to play dumb then they are just as criminal as the person committing crimes. With evidence in the public domain it's a lot easier to bring justice to high profile people like politicians. Furthermore without Wikileaks a lot of information regarding Benghazi, for example, or war crimes like documented civilian murders, would have never seen the light of day specifically because the US Government can dictate when and why they choose to honor FOIA requests, and the most egregious acts of those in power would never be seen by the public.

So if you value freedom and justice and are opposed to tyranny: root for Assange. Not because you think he is a good person, but because you value truth. And if you support leakers, or want to see the criminals who try to rule through back room dealings brought to justice you can't be picky about how the information gets out. You either support it, or you support criminal activities within our own government.


The question is, How can anything from Assange be considered 100% untampered with at this point? It's the easiest rebuttal, surely? Especially given the time-delay.


And if you support leakers, or want to see the criminals who try to rule through back room dealings brought to justice


Aren't people who leak also criminals? Or does this not matter when its something you want to see.

If you leak documents unintentionally or store them unsecurely, you want people punished.
But if you leak them intentionally or purposely put them in public, you want them praised.



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 03:42 AM
link   
a reply to: SudoNim

You're right SudoNim. This is an unprecedented election that calls for unprecedented tactics. I don't think any Presidential election in the past 75 years (or maybe 200 years) has had both candidates HATED and REVILED so vehemently by opposition voters.

You see it all the time here on ATS... "I can't stand Hillary" and "I hate Trump!".

What's here on ATS is representative of the extreme emotions running rampant nationwide for this 2016 Presidential election.



posted on Sep, 9 2016 @ 03:47 AM
link   
a reply to: SudoNim

No. Under no condition is a whistle blower or a leaker a criminal. If you expose criminal acts by leaking something to the public you should be praised, not condemned.

Julian Assange doesn't tamper with leaked material. Wikileaks is the venue for disseminating documents that could get the people providing that information into a lot of trouble, potentially placing them in danger. So, yes, you can trust Wikileaks. And i sure as hell trust him, whistle blowers, and leakers a lot more than i trust a politician.




top topics



 
104
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join