It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: muse7
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: zazzafrazz
Oh nothing to do with her looks that's typical misogynist ("hey don't play the sexism card even though I'm being a pig") crap. I mean I genuinely love Warren and hate Hillary.
And Warren along with Bernie know that a Trump presidency would be disastrous and needs to be avoided at all costs.
But you're willing to sit out and vote 3rd party?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: ketsuko
Like I said, the Republican narrative is reduced to "I know you are, but what am I?"
Are you guys really completely out of ideas Ketsuko?
As you were pointing out the other day, do two or three wrongs make a right?
Sad.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: ketsuko
Like I said, the Republican narrative is reduced to "I know you are, but what am I?"
Are you guys really completely out of ideas Ketsuko?
As you were pointing out the other day, do two or three wrongs make a right?
Sad.
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: xuenchen
I'm confident some Members here will now make a case for the Democrat Platform issues.
But I won't hold my breath.
Me either.
The most NATIONALISTIC.
The most FASCIST.
The most AUTHORITARIAN
Platform in US history.
'Crickets'.
If you dare, open that tripe up in another thread and we'll take a look.
For now, keep worrying about the logo, and the number of flags, and the shape of the letters on the DNC stage ... you know, the important things.
Yo READ the THREAD.
I have QUOTED quite ALOT of content from it.
NO need.
Yeah?
Then you failed to prove fascism, authoritarianism, or any other -ism (Honestly, I usually ignore your posts .... I'm sure you threw in commun-ism, social-ism, etc.)
I missed the 'liberal' in PAYING THEIR FAIR SHARE.
I mean that isn't just fascist or authoritarian in the least RIGHT ?
I have FAILED NOTHING.
Because I know you did not even bother to READ those posts.
There is over 20 of them.
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: zazzafrazz
I don't know if its sexists, but it is childish to pick on her looks, I will give you that.
Out of curiosity, why didn't you express your outrage when people were making sexual jokes about Trump and Pence on this very thread?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: xuenchen
I'm confident some Members here will now make a case for the Democrat Platform issues.
But I won't hold my breath.
Me either.
The most NATIONALISTIC.
The most FASCIST.
The most AUTHORITARIAN
Platform in US history.
'Crickets'.
If you dare, open that tripe up in another thread and we'll take a look.
For now, keep worrying about the logo, and the number of flags, and the shape of the letters on the DNC stage ... you know, the important things.
Yo READ the THREAD.
I have QUOTED quite ALOT of content from it.
NO need.
Yeah?
Then you failed to prove fascism, authoritarianism, or any other -ism (Honestly, I usually ignore your posts .... I'm sure you threw in commun-ism, social-ism, etc.)
I missed the 'liberal' in PAYING THEIR FAIR SHARE.
I mean that isn't just fascist or authoritarian in the least RIGHT ?
I have FAILED NOTHING.
Because I know you did not even bother to READ those posts.
There is over 20 of them.
There is?
Did you miss the point where I stated clearly that I routinely ignore your posts?
Talk about reading comprehension issues.
I'm also glad to be here with you on this HISTORIC day, Neo. In the future, after 8 years of Hillary, 8 years of Warren, and so on, you can say you can remember back to when every President was a rich, White man.
Isn't that just magical?
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: ketsuko
Like I said, the Republican narrative is reduced to "I know you are, but what am I?"
Are you guys really completely out of ideas Ketsuko?
As you were pointing out the other day, do two or three wrongs make a right?
Sad.
That is a problem that doesn't have a political leaning. Same as baiting and deflecting.
originally posted by: spiritualzombie
originally posted by: neo96
Zeig Heil.
Save it for the next Trump speech about LAW and ORDER and Making America SAFE Again.
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: muse7
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: zazzafrazz
Oh nothing to do with her looks that's typical misogynist ("hey don't play the sexism card even though I'm being a pig") crap. I mean I genuinely love Warren and hate Hillary.
And Warren along with Bernie know that a Trump presidency would be disastrous and needs to be avoided at all costs.
But you're willing to sit out and vote 3rd party?
I disagree.
Based on past performance--what they've said, supported etc. I believe them to be very similar. I think Trump would be a very moderate republican, almost democrat. I don't think he cares about a second term in office. This is his legacy. If he wins' he'll always be known as one of the presidents of the United States. That's a title that will be in the history books forever.
His campaign rhetoric appeals to the republican base, but his policies will be softer when he's in office. I think you'll start to see a softening of some stances or a more moderate appeal to fight Hillary.
Hillary is just as likely to bring us to war.
I've voting third party.