It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Yes. Because very large amounts of money are being spent in efforts to maintain the status quo in energy production.
Not sure about that. There is some evidence that solar activity has some influence on ENSO intensity (El Nino/La Nina) but not so much on longer term global climate.
The shape and strength of the magnetosphere do have an influence on climate.
The CLOUD experiments were designed to test aspects of the theory that cosmic rays affect climate. They found that cosmic rays can produce aerosols but:
CERN was supposed to run experiments on this not too long ago, but I never saw the results.
But, Kirkby adds, those particles are far too small to serve as seeds for clouds. "At the moment, it actually says nothing about a possible cosmic-ray effect on clouds and climate, but it's a very important first step," he says.
“These results are the most important so far by the CLOUD experiment at CERN,” said CLOUD spokesperson, Jasper Kirkby. “When the nucleation and growth of pure biogenic aerosol particles is included in climate models, it should sharpen our understanding of the impact of human activities on clouds and climate.”
originally posted by: Snarl
I would say that I expected warmer weather to arrive months before it did ... and temperatures haven't really been all that warm so far.
But that's just me. It's a big world out there. Let's see how many people will come along and directly contradict me.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: lostbook
Typical ATS response: "Climate is always changing. Nothing to see here folks!"
Don't expect any alarms to be sounded here.
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: lostbook
Typical ATS response: "Climate is always changing. Nothing to see here folks!"
Don't expect any alarms to be sounded here.
Do you deny that it always has?
Do you also deny that the people blaming mankind for all the current change have also made failed prediction after failed prediction?
Between those two things, at what point do you begin to get a wee bit skeptical of their latest claims of impeding climate armageddon? I know you have no trouble getting skeptical of other forms of doom porm.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
At what point do you stop listening to propaganda and actually just go look at what the science is saying?