Originally posted by dh
Yes, Howard - 3, 5 and 6 are rather good and I'll be hanging on to them for further reference.
Number 4 looks like perhaps some evidence of sylph activity way back then
Thanks
Although having looked at the other chemtrail thread currently upfront, which appears to carry similarly tagged URLs, I'm a bit confused
Somebody's hoaxing?
[edit on 24-1-2005 by dh]
I'm sorry dh but you lost me -- on one thing when your refer to Number 4 as sylph activity and on your second paragraph?
I could just be tired from doing snow but I'm confused.
thanks
jm


