It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: CynConcepts
Another reason why I won't vote that ticket. Kasich is about as far from libertarian as you can get on the Republican slate.
On the Republican slate, I agree. Kasich is not a good republican. He tends to be more reasonable on matters of war and freedom. That doesn't match any republican ideal.
As far as real libertarian views, he does quite well.
He would of been a great alternative to Hillary.
Kasich would never be a good pick for anything except food taster. That's the role he should have played at the convention. He would have saved a lot of people from the norovirus.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: CynConcepts
Another reason why I won't vote that ticket. Kasich is about as far from libertarian as you can get on the Republican slate.
On the Republican slate, I agree. Kasich is not a good republican. He tends to be more reasonable on matters of war and freedom. That doesn't match any republican ideal.
As far as real libertarian views, he does quite well.
He would of been a great alternative to Hillary.
Kasich would never be a good pick for anything except food taster. That's the role he should have played at the convention. He would have saved a lot of people from the norovirus.
His polling numbers against Hillary were phenomenal. He could have won easily.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: CynConcepts
Another reason why I won't vote that ticket. Kasich is about as far from libertarian as you can get on the Republican slate.
On the Republican slate, I agree. Kasich is not a good republican. He tends to be more reasonable on matters of war and freedom. That doesn't match any republican ideal.
As far as real libertarian views, he does quite well.
He would of been a great alternative to Hillary.
Kasich would never be a good pick for anything except food taster. That's the role he should have played at the convention. He would have saved a lot of people from the norovirus.
His polling numbers against Hillary were phenomenal. He could have won easily.
She would just have sent him some food before the debates and he'd have been a no show.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: CynConcepts
Another reason why I won't vote that ticket. Kasich is about as far from libertarian as you can get on the Republican slate.
On the Republican slate, I agree. Kasich is not a good republican. He tends to be more reasonable on matters of war and freedom. That doesn't match any republican ideal.
As far as real libertarian views, he does quite well.
He would of been a great alternative to Hillary.
Kasich would never be a good pick for anything except food taster. That's the role he should have played at the convention. He would have saved a lot of people from the norovirus.
His polling numbers against Hillary were phenomenal. He could have won easily.
She would just have sent him some food before the debates and he'd have been a no show.
Don't waste my time with trolling.
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: introvert
He was not popular among Republicans. He only won one state.
So, that was not going to work against Hillary.
Polls - not very useful things.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: introvert
He was not popular among Republicans. He only won one state.
So, that was not going to work against Hillary.
Polls - not very useful things.
He was popular among all types of voters.
That is what was needed to win the election.
Now you have a crap shoot to deal with.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: introvert
He was not popular among Republicans. He only won one state.
So, that was not going to work against Hillary.
Polls - not very useful things.
He was popular among all types of voters.
That is what was needed to win the election.
Now you have a crap shoot to deal with.