It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Lurker with pic I would like to share

page: 4
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in


posted on Jul, 19 2016 @ 07:28 AM
a reply to: EndOfDays77

the reptilian slit eye pretty creepy

posted on Jul, 19 2016 @ 09:29 AM
To clarify , They did not see anyone there. They don't recognize these two the phone captured. The one that took the pic
is very in tune with paranormal things. One of the SIL's has been in contact with the guy that runs this house. I believe
his name is Nick. That's about all I got. Just wanted to share an amazing capture. I can go back to lurker mode now. Thanks
for taking a look.

posted on Jul, 19 2016 @ 10:01 AM
a reply to: mikeh3t

Thank you so much for being brave and putting this picture out there for us to see!

It has been exciting, and if eleventh is stumped, it is a good sign you have a genuine capture that has been analyzed by a professional.

peace to you. Hope your relative isn't too freaked out by it! I would be...

- AB

posted on Jul, 20 2016 @ 03:14 PM
a reply to: mikeh3t

Lol, Betelgeuse,Betelgeuse,Betelgeuse. That's who the person looks like

posted on Jul, 20 2016 @ 04:17 PM
The male or female on the left looks like he has bug eyes or is wearing sunglasses? Maybe it is just the lighting playing tricks. a reply to: mikeh3t

posted on Jul, 20 2016 @ 04:34 PM
a reply to: EndOfDays77

I've never been a believer of talk about reptilians, but that made the hairs on my neck stand up. Creepy!

posted on Jul, 20 2016 @ 04:58 PM
I have been checking in on this thread with interest.
It's possible it might be real.

But - my brother has an LG G4, and he is always doing all kinds of trick photography with it.
One of the things is photo layering/double exposure.
He can even have a still picture showing the same person in it like... 5 times... in different positions or walking across the room.

posted on Jul, 21 2016 @ 02:06 AM
a reply to: BlueAjah


Yes, I already thought of this possibility, but it implies that the photographer was dishonest. I have the email address of Mike and of her sister in law with their full names and I can say that they are "real" people. I can't strictly exclude the possibility, but I don't think that this is the case here.

However, I really would like to see some of these double exposure shots taken with the LG G4.

Do you think that it could be possible for your brother to send me some of these double exposure shots, in their original format? So I can check the EXIF data and compare them to that of the "ghost" photo.

Thank you!

posted on Jul, 21 2016 @ 04:34 AM
a reply to: elevenaugust

I could read your analysis all day - so fascinating!

posted on Jul, 21 2016 @ 04:37 AM
ALso Mike

What is the story of the haunting at this joint?

Were there particular ghosts that were previously seen at this location?

How did they die?

It'd be interesting if there are multiple sightings of an old lady and a zombie man!

posted on Jul, 23 2016 @ 09:18 PM

originally posted by: elevenaugust
Snipped for convenience since this part is what I want to comment on..

Another thing which is puzzling is that the two ghosts are not clearly defined. It’s like if they were taken with the camera out of focus. This should be impossible as in the two other photos, the two subjects are neat, and clearly on focus with the camera likely set at the infinite and with the depth of field very large, like most of these android camera. This means that all the subjects from a short distance to the camera up to the infinite should be on focus, which is obviously not the case for the two “ghosts”.

elevenaugust, hey just like to thank you at the start, I used to do a lot of this on here and elsewhere being an amateur photographer/ digital artist and 37 year computer tech. Glad someone else is doing some serious work since I stopped (mostly fed up with some of BS around here so I don't stop in much anymore.)

Now to the thing I wanted to point out, you mentioned and I agree they appear "out of focus", You hint at what is most likely the cause though. They both appear to be moving towards the camera which would induce a little motion blur at the lower light levels in this picture specially with the lights of the hotel being as relatively bright as they appear to be. The motion blur would also account for the step appearing to show through the head.

Ok, just my 2 cents worth.

edit on 23-7-2016 by Wolfie0827 because: Edit to fix sites mess up of the quote section.

posted on Aug, 24 2016 @ 01:29 PM
a reply to: mikeh3t

I think it's odd how the head on the figure on the left looks deformed. It looks like his forehead is bulging out.

Second, this might be a dumb question but is it weird that the rays from the light directly next to him shine in front of his arm? Shouldn't we see a whole black silhouette of his arm and all of the light behind it? it might be normal; I just thought I'd point it out.

top topics

<< 1  2  3   >>

log in