It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Q: Any ATS member have a written transcript of French President François Hollande's Nice speech?

page: 2
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 15 2016 @ 01:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: MALBOSIA
I am not saying anything is anything but what do you guys think is the hussle here. I gave up watching broadcast television a few years ago. Up untill then, if a cat got ran over by a car it was due to islamic terrorism. Now that I dont watch news anymore, all I hear about from these sites is that the news and government are HIDING the islamic threat.

Can you understand my confussion?


The hustle is in democracies where people can vote their conscience, those in power are gaming the system to manipulate voter conscience. They are censoring "Islamist extreme", out of sight out of mind as much as possible and immediate damage control where they cannot hide it completely.

Simple matter of guarding their jobs and the power that comes with them jealously.
edit on 15-7-2016 by TinfoilTP because: (no reason given)




posted on Jul, 15 2016 @ 08:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: MALBOSIA
I am not saying anything is anything but what do you guys think is the hussle here. I gave up watching broadcast television a few years ago. Up untill then, if a cat got ran over by a car it was due to islamic terrorism. Now that I dont watch news anymore, all I hear about from these sites is that the news and government are HIDING the islamic threat.

Can you understand my confussion?


I can understand you may be confused.

I've never heard of an attack being islamic terrorism until it was proven to be islamic terrorism. I honestly believe you've been called out on your original statement and now you're crawfishing and claiming you don't even watch broadcast television anymore. Furthermore, a few years ago, islamic terrorism wasn't talked about very often. It just started when ISIS came into the picture a couple of years ago.


Well if your not going to move on peace...

Nobody called me out on anything. All anyone has sone was vindicated my first post. This a "Obama is hiding islamic terrorism because he is an Islamist" or some snip like that. The OP did not state it directly so I wanted to clarify.

And no, I do not have a set-top box. My TV is hooked up to am Xbox and I watch Netflix when I get a chance or whatever videos I get through this site on my phone. I only ever watched CBC and they too went down the "terror terror terror" on 2/3 reports so I stopped a few a years ago. Ill swear that on my childs life.

You are wrong. The reports on Islamic terror might have died down a bit for a year or so while we were pulling out of afghanistan and Iraq and picked up again with ISIS but it was never gone.



posted on Jul, 15 2016 @ 09:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: MALBOSIA

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: MALBOSIA
I am not saying anything is anything but what do you guys think is the hussle here. I gave up watching broadcast television a few years ago. Up untill then, if a cat got ran over by a car it was due to islamic terrorism. Now that I dont watch news anymore, all I hear about from these sites is that the news and government are HIDING the islamic threat.

Can you understand my confussion?


I have no idea where you have been if you are not aware that the democrats have been doing everything they can to avoid the use of the term 'islamic terrorist'. By Democrats I also include their propaganda arms CNN, MSNBC and CBS News.


Oh I see. Thats what I thought. Obamageddon....


... moving on.


But you don't watch broadcast television, and haven't for the past few years. None of this came to the forefront until two years ago. So you're lying and have been caught. Moving on would be the best option at this point in the thread.


What thread?

This topic completely shifted towards me, the only post that dared to question the OP.

There is tumble weed blowing through this thread. Nobody came here to discuss anything.

None of what "came to the forefront" ??

I read here quite a bit. You think maybe I might have read something about something a few times since 2004.

Pretty much everything I know about affairs comes from the impressions I get by what is posted here and even the most narrow minded person would have considered that.



posted on Jul, 15 2016 @ 09:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: MALBOSIA
I am not saying anything is anything but what do you guys think is the hussle here. I gave up watching broadcast television a few years ago. Up untill then, if a cat got ran over by a car it was due to islamic terrorism. Now that I dont watch news anymore, all I hear about from these sites is that the news and government are HIDING the islamic threat.

Can you understand my confussion?


The hustle is in democracies where people can vote their conscience, those in power are gaming the system to manipulate voter conscience. They are censoring "Islamist extreme", out of sight out of mind as much as possible and immediate damage control where they cannot hide it completely.

Simple matter of guarding their jobs and the power that comes with them jealously.


That is kind of up the same alley I was thinking. I dont think that TPTB want to deal with backlash of using a certain demographic as an excuse to anything they want geopolitcally. Yes they want people to be scared of them, but they dont want the people taking matters into their own hands when the authorities "fail" to overcome the threat.



posted on Jul, 15 2016 @ 10:43 PM
link   
a reply to: Krakatoa

He did say Islam. I read it last night on one of the live feed quotes. Can't remember which one, I really didn't pay attention there were so many. But below the headline photo of him making the speech, in huge black font, he was quoted saying, "than the terrorists of radical Islam who seek to destroy it.", in that last bit there...not the way it is now.

Now, I suppose it could have been sensationalist reporting or a poor translation...but I don't think so. It was there, bold as daylight. He also used the word earlier in the same speech, citing how terrorists of extreme Islam had already attacked Paris, but that appears to have been removed as well.

And I know other people saw/heard it too, because there was a big flurry of people insisting it was IS, that right away they were looking for accomplices and ties to radical Islam.

Something is very wrong here.




top topics
 
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join