Newt Gingrich Says We Should ‘Test Every Person’ Of Muslim Descent

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: crazyewok
If they are USA citizens they cant be deported anywhere!

I heard about this charming island the contains a country that just voted to leave the European Union, consider them a congratulations gift.

Send them to Germany! Merkal welcoming them with open arms!

a reply to: InTheLight
I don't know but reading the bible, it seems that david was most beloved of god,
how many wives and concubines did the guy have??

Abraham, anothor of God's favorites took Sarah as his wife, but then when she was barren, sara gave her handmaid to abraham to be his concubine. Lot ended up with two wives when he fell in love with the youngest sister but her dad insisted that it was only proper to marry the eldest first.

what was a sin was to compromise the lineage of the children produced by a man's wife.

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: Aazadan

Wrong country instead it makes us VERY ANGRY not afraid,that is your problem.
WE aren't Europeans ,we know OURSELVES, no castes,no "places" in society,we stand behind no one on the planet in our country and never will.
The LIARS we elected not at all withstanding compared to us.

Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to making bad decisions.

a reply to: Aazadan

Yes it does,I don't use it in combat, I use my head,THAT'S my job SEEK ,identify and act.
You can't do that all emotional and dysfunctional like some Eastern trained clown.
You are zoned like a machine,you rely on training and you live.
I SEE a problem,it's got haze and smoke in front of it so I have to wait until I came into contact with it and see what all the variables are at the time.
NO hate ,hunting a threat.

CHILD PORN!!! Now that I've got your attention. Categorize ISIS materials, radical Islamic websites, Facebook, mosques that preach radical Islam...treat them all like we treat child porn. If you view it, download it, historically subscribe to it...you get arrested, tried and jailed and forever wear the badge of a terrorist/terrorist supporter. If after release you move to a new town, you have to announce who you are and what you did...just like a sex criminal. You have to stay 1000 yards away from any gathering place, you can't own any weapon and can't drive a car (or a French truck).

Why not? If we do this for people who simply download an image (as vile as it is), why not now...for this?

originally posted by: WeAreAWAKE
CHILD PORN!!! Now that I've got your attention. Categorize ISIS materials, radical Islamic websites, Facebook, mosques that preach radical Islam...treat them all like we treat child porn. If you view it, download it, historically subscribe to it...you get arrested, tried and jailed and forever wear the badge of a terrorist/terrorist supporter. If after release you move to a new town, you have to announce who you are and what you did...just like a sex criminal. You have to stay 1000 yards away from any gathering place, you can't own any weapon and can't drive a car (or a French truck).

Why not? If we do this for people who simply download an image (as vile as it is), why not now...for this?

Wouldn't that just piss em off even more and make it more likely that they will end their life and take as many people as they can with them?

a reply to: WeAreAWAKE

It would be against the innocent members of Islam,who supposedly outnumber those who are not, yet they aren't stopping things from changing situations effectively, so it would be rude to track their faith in the fashion you describe.

When I hear people ask why peaceful muslims aren't out there stopping radical ones-- it makes me wonder-- why aren't the supposed good AR-15 owners stopping the bad ones from committing mass shootings? By not stopping these mass shootings before they happen, are these supposed 'good' AR-15 owners partly to blame? I mean if they expect us to believe the majority owners are peaceful, they should step up and stop the mass shootings.

Kinda dumb arguments don't ya think?

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
When I hear people ask why peaceful muslims aren't out there stopping radical ones-- it makes me wonder-- why aren't the supposed good AR-15 owners stopping the bad ones from committing mass shootings? By not stopping these mass shootings before they happen, are these supposed 'good' AR-15 owners partly to blame? I mean if they expect us to believe the majority owners are peaceful, they should step up and stop the mass shootings.

Kinda dumb arguments don't ya think?

Sorry...not even close. Every single American and probably everyone in the world denounce these mass shootings. Any gun owner I know would immediately turn another gun owner (or non gun owner) in, in a heartbeat if they suspected them to be violent or see them moving toward violence. In...a...heartbeat. That is all anyone is asking of the Muslim community. Tell us when you see someone turning radical, tell the police if you see someone stockpiling weapons, etc.

No one is asking for more. We know damn well that not every Muslim knows every other Muslim. But we also know that some attend a mosque where hate is preached. We also know that many want their religion to be the law at minimum within their community...even when that religious belief is against our laws (killing someone for being gay for example). But they allow it...they support things like Sharia and some have hidden killings of family members that have broken their laws. THAT is the difference. Even the moderates aren't moderate.

originally posted by: spiritualzombie
"why aren't the supposed good AR-15 owners..."

Quoting you above. So on a personal note, why did you say "supposed"? Was that a little slip of the lip implying that you don't believe there is such a thing as a good AR-15 owner?

Just asking.

a reply to: spiritualzombie

GUN FREE ZONES.DUH.

a reply to: cavtrooper7

How about we not use the word "gun". It is kinda non-PC. Why don't we just call them "Fish in a Barrel" zones.

a reply to: WeAreAWAKE

I can't keep up with the jive...you know...

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: InTheLight
That's odd because the Bible does not permit polygamy (adultery). Is this another self-serving interpretation made by men?

Does it make a difference? It happens.

And polygamy is not adultery, which is why we have two different words for each situation.

Well, David engaged in polygamy and was described as being a man after God's own heart if I remember the quote correctly. Even the New Testament doesn't forbid it. Adultery to my knowledge does not refer to a man sleeping with an unmarried woman. It refers to sleeping with person who is in a relationship ordained by God, ie. marriage. The New Testament says that a bishop is not allowed to have more than one wife, but by saying this doesn't indicate that someone of lower ranking in the church cannot be in a plural marriage. It''s says that a "bishop must be blameless, the husband of one wife".

It does seem to indicate that it is violation of divine law and will.

"Test"? You mean like feed them poisoned lamb's meat like Mohammed. See if they survive? If they survive then they are trustworthy Holy Spirit filled space rock worshipping heathens whose religion requires the death penalty for those who are honoring the 10 Commandments requirement not be bow before silver encased meteorites and worship a space rock.

a reply to: windword

if they believe in Sharia, they should be deported.

Wow. That is some serious, anti-American #. Being deported, even if a citizen, simply for a belief.

“Anybody who goes on a website favoring ISIS, or al Qaeda, or other terrorist groups, that should be a felony, and they should go to jail.

Charged with a felony simply for visiting a website?!



God, we're doomed if people like these ever become the majority and are elected president.

So much for terrorism destroying our American way of life. Leave it to the politicians!

originally posted by: Liquesence


Charged with a felony simply for visiting a website?!

Glee actor Mark Salling was charged with a felony for possessing material on his computer that he got from the internet with no determination made if he was a victim of sexual assault by a state which like most grants freedom people who victimize people in person, not just on the internet. Mark Salling might not have even victized a child in person himself and quite possibly could be a victim if the state releases people without determining if they are at risk of reoffending.

Why not imprison everyone whose belief requires them to kill those abiding US law and the Old Testament 10 Commandments which forbid worshipping space rocks? Treason was once a death penalty offence. A religion which requires you to kill US citizens is treason. Any legislature which allows this religion to practice is guilty of treason.

It seems that many of you do not recognize that Newts comment was hyperbole designed to trigger the democrats into taking a stand that would seem by many to support Islam, terrorism and Obama's lenient view on Islamic violence in our country.
Newt is an intelligent man who knows damn well that there is no reality where we will be hauling in Muslims and asking them of their views on Sharia. The comment was also designed to align Newt with Trump and cause a pulic outpouring of support from Trump voters.

This is akin to Bernie Sanders promising free college education to every American or Hillary's claim to support women.
It is all carefully crafted, insincere, and simply designed to trigger a response.

Newt's desire is to make it clear to the voters that Hillary will do nothing to stem the growing tide of Islamic terrorism in the US. He never really has any desire to actually carry it out.

That should be obvious to everyone. It's a game and you are all playing it whether you realize it or not.

They should probably outlaw being a Muslim too. Just to be safe. Muslims are dangerous.

originally posted by: TheLaughingGod
They should probably outlaw being a Muslim too. Just to be safe. Muslims are dangerous.

Not just Muslims. Any religion like the Mormons which have killed in the past like Mountain Meadows Massacre and have threatened honorably discharged veterans of the military with abduction for not believing in six foot tall men on the moon should be arrested on the spot.


If their religion violates public safety and order. And organizations like the Masons who drafted and signed concepts like freedom of religion with no bounds should be arrested. Freedom of religion is an act of oppression when it includes things like the Branch Davidians, Islam, and Mormons. They all in the expression of their freedom of religion oppress other people's legal rights.