It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Clinton Foundation vs. Clinton Campaign ???

page: 2
11
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 14 2016 @ 11:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: bobs_uruncle



Considering Hillary and bill's proclivity for all things illegal, immoral and unethical, it further cements the validity of the questions


Utter nonsense. The entire premise of the thread is rooted in hatred for the Clintons. Once you actually think about it and realize that the campaign does not need the Foundation money, it does not pass the initial common sense test.

Why would the Clintons bother to shift money illegally when the campaign doesn't even need it?

C'mon guys. This isn't rocket science.


You're fighting over speculation? What's wrong with you? Why are you so angry and hate filled every time someone puts forward a possible hypothesis about Hillary and criminality? Are you incapable of looking at rational probabilities? Hillary has a vile track record, how can you discount reality to the point of delusion?

Oh, and about the "last word" thing you seem to have going on... Lol

Cheers - Dave
edit on 7/14.2016 by bobs_uruncle because: (no reason given)




posted on Jul, 14 2016 @ 11:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: SM2
the clintons do lots of things that dont make much sense....selling missile guidance tech to the chinese, renting the Lincoln bedroom, selling uranium mining rights to the Russians. They have been involved in pay to play schemes for over 30 years. I would put nothing past those two thugs.

The common word there is 'selling'.

It makes sense when you look at them as moneygrubbers that do not have allegiance to the United States.



posted on Jul, 14 2016 @ 11:54 AM
link   
a reply to: bobs_uruncle



You're fighting over speculation? What's wrong with you?


Who's fighting? We're having a conversation. If what I say offends you or you feel insulted, perhaps you need to review what you are saying or grow a backbone.



Why are you so angry and hate filled every time someone puts forward a possible hypothesis about Hillary and criminality?


Angry and hate filled? That's quite a lot of projection you're doing here.



Are you incapable of looking at rational probabilities?


What is rational about what has been suggested? Her campaign doesn't need the money. Why funnel money, illegally, if they don't even need it? To suggest as much is not rational. My assertion is much more logical.



Hillary has a vile track record, how can you discount reality to the point of delusion?


Actually, she has been accused of many, many things and has never been found guilty. That would seem to be a very good track record.



Oh, and about the "last word" thing you seem to have going on... Lol


What the hell are you talking about? Apparently you have been triggered. Please stick to the topic and leave your emotions out of it. They have no place in this conversation.



posted on Jul, 14 2016 @ 12:32 PM
link   

a reply to: introvert

Actually, she has been accused of many, many things and has never been found guilty. That would seem to be a very good track record.


And Al Capone was not a crook nor a Gangster, he was simply a tax evader!



posted on Jul, 14 2016 @ 12:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

So what DO you have to support your whole opening post?.
Or is this another one of those EVERYBODY KNOWS kind of things.
edit on 7142016 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 14 2016 @ 12:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Another fallacy. The Clinton foundation isn't under investigation as far as anyone knows.


Well except by Judicial Watch.
edit on 7142016 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 14 2016 @ 12:41 PM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

What's your point?. She was cleared wasn't she? Yes she was. Sour grapes?



posted on Jul, 14 2016 @ 12:45 PM
link   
With Silly and introvert defending the HRC machine, you know she must be the most honest and bestest pres. candidate the US of A has ever had, or we're being CTR'ed.



posted on Jul, 14 2016 @ 12:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: AlaskanDad

a reply to: introvert

Actually, she has been accused of many, many things and has never been found guilty. That would seem to be a very good track record.


And Al Capone was not a crook nor a Gangster, he was simply a tax evader!


False equivalence.

I cannot think of any other political family that has been under the microscope as the Clintons. If there was real criminal wrongdoing, it would have been found by now.



posted on Jul, 14 2016 @ 12:47 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

They saw it in their crystal ball. The same one that showed them Hillary in a jail cell wearing an orange jumpsuit.



posted on Jul, 14 2016 @ 12:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: AlaskanDad
With Silly and introvert defending the HRC machine, you know she must be the most honest and bestest pres. candidate the US of A has ever had, or we're being CTR'ed.


Who said she was the most honest or "bestest"?

The point of this is that the OP's speculation is absurd. Why would they need to funnel money when the campaign is in great financial shape?

Can you comment on the topic, or will I have to continue to read stupid Correct the Record or 'Crooked Hillary" comments?



posted on Jul, 14 2016 @ 12:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: introvert

They saw it in their crystal ball. The same one that showed them Hillary in a jail cell wearing an orange jumpsuit.


Careful what you say, Silly. They have begun to pull out the Correct the Record references since their logic has completely fallen on it's face.

Us paid internet trolls need to stick together.



posted on Jul, 14 2016 @ 12:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Justso

Oh well there you go then. What more do we need.



posted on Jul, 14 2016 @ 12:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: butcherguy

What's your point?. She was cleared wasn't she? Yes she was. Sour grapes?

Yep.
She's honest.
She's truthful.

She's lovable.



posted on Jul, 14 2016 @ 12:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: butcherguy

What's your point?. She was cleared wasn't she? Yes she was. Sour grapes?

Sorry, she wasn't cleared.

She wasn't charged with a crime.

She obviously broke the rules and lied about it repeatedly.



posted on Jul, 14 2016 @ 01:01 PM
link   
a reply to: thinline

Funny the foundation still lists it's address as New York. They work all over the globe.

This is just fishing.

Someone's always up their Ass(etts) about some supposed broken rule or some imagined crime.
Just when are you guys going to see this is just an attack? How long before you open your eyes.
Unbelievable.



posted on Jul, 14 2016 @ 01:03 PM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

More iron clad logic. Rah rah trump for president.



posted on Jul, 14 2016 @ 01:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme
Do you read any of my posts?

I dislike Trump intensely.

I dislike Hillary even more.



posted on Jul, 14 2016 @ 01:06 PM
link   
a reply to: SM2

That says equally that there is no investigation. I think you guys are picking what you want to be true.



posted on Jul, 14 2016 @ 01:09 PM
link   
a reply to: bobs_uruncle

Logic would require motivation for a crime. Since she doesn't need the money what is the motive?
It's not happening , makes no sense at all and there is zero evidence so this is garbage.




top topics



 
11
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join