It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: skyblueworld
It is inconceivable, cosmic radiation would have destroyed any organic matter millions of years ago.
To be honest I'm less and less convinced that these foto's come from mars at all
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: skyblueworld
Link doesn't work buddy.
Mars being exposed to a ridiculous amount of radiation isn't debatable
originally posted by: frenchfries
To be honest I'm less and less convinced that these foto's come from mars at all it Maybe CGI or maybe somewhere on earth.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: skyblueworld
Skeletons don't just appear out of nowhere. If they are the remains of living beings, there must have been an entire ecosystem to support them... where are the bison skeletons, the lion skeletons, etc? Where are the markings indicating the dwellings they lived in? The tools? Occam's razor suggests that it is just an isolated rock formation that just looks a bit like a humanoid skeleton: pareidolia.
The sands of time change landscapes, as you know.
Better closeup detail of these anomalies would be great, and would probably put these cases to bed for good.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: skyblueworld
The sands of time change landscapes, as you know.
Funny how the sands of time turn up humanoid remains but not elephants.
Better closeup detail of these anomalies would be great, and would probably put these cases to bed for good.
Don't hold your breath. These formations are of little scientific interest, and there is no "case" to put to rest.
Always need a bonus round, say what you see: