It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Republicans brand pornography ‘a public health crisis’

page: 2
19
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 13 2016 @ 05:00 AM
link   
Add another face palm.

I just don't know how much more blatant the republican party can be about controlling your life and chipping at our civil rights. I don't think religious people really like freedom, it scares them.




posted on Jul, 13 2016 @ 05:01 AM
link   
My face is so palmed I've just had o put ice on it.....



posted on Jul, 13 2016 @ 05:01 AM
link   
Double post...SORRY!!

edit on AM3Wed20161972 by andy1972 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 13 2016 @ 05:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: RobotBomb
This is equal to gender neutral bathrooms on the pressing issues scale.


No. Porn is not a pressing issue. Gender neutral bathrooms are a pressing issue. Not going to argue why here, but the 2 are completely different.



posted on Jul, 13 2016 @ 05:05 AM
link   
a reply to: reldra
Gender neutral bathrooms are and were not a pressing issue no matter how hard you try to convince yourself.

I wouldn't expect a SJW to know that though.



posted on Jul, 13 2016 @ 05:06 AM
link   
a reply to: andy1972




Why are politicians so stupid.....

We keep electing stupid people into positions of power....



posted on Jul, 13 2016 @ 05:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
Add another face palm.

I just don't know how much more blatant the republican party can be about controlling your life and chipping at our civil rights. I don't think religious people really like freedom, it scares them.


They have always been completely crystal clear on that. They say 3 words to placate the NRA an get money and half of the entire country thinks Republicans and evangelists are FOR the constitution. It is really the other way around.
edit on 13-7-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 13 2016 @ 05:12 AM
link   
So ... the party of individual freedom wants to take away one of the most basic ways that humans express themselves and interact with each other, i.e. sexuality? How absurd. Someone mentioned finding out what's on their "hard drives" ... and I bet even the strong-stomached among us would be shocked. That's the sick, twisted nature of the desire to rule over others.

I say that unbridled authoritarianism is the greatest health crisis facing us today.



posted on Jul, 13 2016 @ 05:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: RobotBomb
a reply to: reldra
Gender neutral bathrooms are and were not a pressing issue no matter how hard you try to convince yourself.

I wouldn't expect a SJW to know that though.



I didn't need to convince myself. Many cities and towns are going through figureing out the issue. So it is a pressing issue.
I am concerned with areas of social justice. If you aren't, maybe you should be. They are issues this country was built upon and progressed upon.
edit on 13-7-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)

edit on 13-7-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 13 2016 @ 05:16 AM
link   
They constantly make me question registering as one

Probably the same people opposed to porn have a secret stash of playboy in their D. C. homes.



posted on Jul, 13 2016 @ 05:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
. Someone mentioned finding out what's on their "hard drives" ... and I bet even the strong-stomached among us would be shocked. That's the sick, twisted nature of the desire to rule over others.

I say that unbridled authoritarianism is the greatest health crisis facing us today.


I am certain both are true.



posted on Jul, 13 2016 @ 05:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: misterhistory
They constantly make me question registering as one

Probably the same people opposed to porn have a secret stash of playboy in their D. C. homes.


They have more than that. It is always those against it that look at or posess the kind society would find the worst and sometims illegal.
edit on 13-7-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 13 2016 @ 05:25 AM
link   
So less wankin,more spankin eh?



posted on Jul, 13 2016 @ 05:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: VashTheStampede
So less wankin,more spankin eh?


lol. though the spankin, as in 'spanking the monkey' is a US thing and 'wanking' has moved to the US as the same meaning via movies and social media. Though not sure either is ever used for a female.



posted on Jul, 13 2016 @ 05:37 AM
link   
It's amazing that the threat of porn being infringed upon brings everyone together.

Is the female term "pitter-patter?"



posted on Jul, 13 2016 @ 05:46 AM
link   



posted on Jul, 13 2016 @ 06:21 AM
link   
a reply to: reldra




they can take it from my cold, dead...well it wouldn't be palms.


Shower head?

-----

I have a stupid story. My neighbor was super religious (he's passed away and I actually liked him a fair amount, still have lovely chats with his wife) and liked to come over and "witness" to me. One day he came over and was on a roll, "You shouldn't be drinking, smoking looking at pornography and doing drugs!". "Mr. Neighbor, I don't do drugs...". It never seemed to bother him that I was living in sin with a woman at the time. She was very easy to like though.

Leave me to my weird and shameful practices. Porn is the least of my problems and societies.



posted on Jul, 13 2016 @ 06:22 AM
link   
a reply to: ~Lucidity




posted on Jul, 13 2016 @ 06:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: reldra
republicans always want into people's bedrooms.


Thank God for this amendment to their platform, it will certainly help me.

I will now be much more productive between the hours of 10:23:35AM and 10:23:40AM.



posted on Jul, 13 2016 @ 06:43 AM
link   
I read about this yesterday. Clearly the Republicans are the "social justice warriors" here.
edit on 13-7-2016 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
19
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join