It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Sanders to endorse Clinton in N.H.

page: 4
15
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 11:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Funny, since you were the first one to use that excuse in this thread.

#doublestandards




posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 11:55 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Or give us one of his speeches where he's caught lying?

Oh, wait, there isn't one...

He is not as dumb as hillary is
edit on 255k2016Tuesdayam014 by Nikola014 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 11:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Funny, since you were the first one to use that excuse in this thread.

#doublestandards

No I actually look for objective sources. Not partisan ones.



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 11:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Or give us one of his speeches where he's caught lying?

Oh, wait, there isn't one...


Where Trump is caught lying? He's been caught lying in literally every one of his speeches. PolitiFact got so tired of calling out his lies that they made a whole page dedicated to Trump lies. You SERIOUSLY think he's been telling the truth? Is your grasp on reality tenuous or something?



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 11:57 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Yet you get your info from Washington Post? Come on man... if your going to talk the talk, at least walk the walk.



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 11:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Yet you get your info from Washington Post? Come on man... if your going to talk the talk, at least walk the walk.

Sorry, but YOUR opinion on what is and isn't biased is something I wouldn't ever take seriously after the sources you've given me. So your words here mean squat to me.



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 11:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
Well, I am not foolish and I don't believe that. I don't know why you would assume I do or what it has to do with my comment.

So you don't like party unity but don't agree with Trump's party disunity plan? So what do you want exactly? You sound super inconsistent here.


Trump is a lifelong democrat who was urged to run by Bill Clinton. His disuniting of the GOP, as you noted, benefits democrats. Funny that.

I understand that party unity wins elections and disunity loses them. I just don't find these tactics palatable or ethical and I refuse to celebrate and participate in them.



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 12:00 PM
link   
Bern-idict Arnold. Has a nice ring to it.


Seriously, Who didn't see this coming? The old dude is and has always been a pure sell out.



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 12:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

"War Criminals Among Us..."

In my view, it has nothing to do with political parties but everything to do with criminals.




posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 12:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
Well, I am not foolish and I don't believe that. I don't know why you would assume I do or what it has to do with my comment.

So you don't like party unity but don't agree with Trump's party disunity plan? So what do you want exactly? You sound super inconsistent here.


Trump is a lifelong democrat who was urged to run by Bill Clinton. His disuniting of the GOP, as you noted, benefits democrats. Funny that.

Running with the "Democrat plant" conspiracy theory I see.


I understand that party unity wins elections and disunity loses them. I just don't find these tactics palatable or ethical and I refuse to celebrate and participate in them.

Sucks to be you then.



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 12:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

Sucks to be you then.


Not at all. It's a liberation to not lower my standards because of party loyalty and the ridiculous idea that the two parties serve different agendas. I'm grateful to think freely.



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 12:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
Well, I am not foolish and I don't believe that. I don't know why you would assume I do or what it has to do with my comment.

So you don't like party unity but don't agree with Trump's party disunity plan? So what do you want exactly? You sound super inconsistent here.


Trump is a lifelong democrat who was urged to run by Bill Clinton. His disuniting of the GOP, as you noted, benefits democrats. Funny that.

Running with the "Democrat plant" conspiracy theory I see.


There's more evidence of that than the idea that Trump is a republican and can be trusted.



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 12:05 PM
link   
Bahahaha!

edit on 12-7-2016 by Konduit because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 12:24 PM
link   
It was funny watching it live. He about wacked her and made her duck a lot every time he would flail his arms. ha ha ha..



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 01:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

Sucks to be you then.


Not at all. It's a liberation to not lower my standards because of party loyalty and the ridiculous idea that the two parties serve different agendas. I'm grateful to think freely.

I can think freely too and part of that is knowing when to endorse a major party candidate and when not to do so. Instead of just blindly disapproving of all party candidates.



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 01:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
Well, I am not foolish and I don't believe that. I don't know why you would assume I do or what it has to do with my comment.

So you don't like party unity but don't agree with Trump's party disunity plan? So what do you want exactly? You sound super inconsistent here.


Trump is a lifelong democrat who was urged to run by Bill Clinton. His disuniting of the GOP, as you noted, benefits democrats. Funny that.

Running with the "Democrat plant" conspiracy theory I see.


There's more evidence of that than the idea that Trump is a republican and can be trusted.

No there isn't. That is 100% speculation. Speculation isn't evidence.



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 01:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
Well, I am not foolish and I don't believe that. I don't know why you would assume I do or what it has to do with my comment.

So you don't like party unity but don't agree with Trump's party disunity plan? So what do you want exactly? You sound super inconsistent here.


Trump is a lifelong democrat who was urged to run by Bill Clinton. His disuniting of the GOP, as you noted, benefits democrats. Funny that.

Running with the "Democrat plant" conspiracy theory I see.


There's more evidence of that than the idea that Trump is a republican and can be trusted.

No there isn't. That is 100% speculation. Speculation isn't evidence.


I generally go by a candidate's record. Trump's record is as a democrat, close friend to the Clintons -- even exchanging favors. And then there is his record in this race -- most of which benefits democrats. And, of course, there is his conversation with Bill Clinton, too...Link.

On the other hand, there is nothing in his record to support the idea that Trump is a republican and has any loyalty or love for the GOP.

I am relying on evidence, you're speculating.



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 01:19 PM
link   
a reply to: MotherMayEye

That is 100% speculation based on past history. A court of law would call that circumstantial evidence. Right now Trump says he's Republican and as much as you don't want to believe it he DOES have a bunch of Republican talking points. Granted he also has a few Democratic talking points, but many of those he is willing to walk over or change on the fly depending on which group of people he is talking to.

To be honest, Trump is neither a Republican OR a Democrat. He's just a narcissist who knows what to say to get people to like him, and there is PLENTY of evidence to prove that.



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 01:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UnBreakable

Well he's doing it for the same reasons I'm doing it. #NeverTrump


Then he should come out and just say it, and quit kissing her arse, where three months ago she said she was unqualified to be POTUS, then today he says she will make a great president. He should've honestly qualified that statement by saying, "She would make a great president, compared to Trump". He had no trouble telling it like it is before, why start now?

You do know that he walked that statement back right?
Bernie Sanders walks back 'unqualified' dig at Hillary Clinton
That was back at the beginning of April.


Let me preface to say I am not a Trump supporter. But will Trump get the same consideration of "walking back" statements as Bernie? I'm having trouble trusting the sincerity of both when they "walk back". All a "walk back" is, is saying something you actually mean, then regretting it when you get unfavorable blowback.



Trump walks back statement on women being punished for abortion if procedure banned

www.foxnews.com...



Trump walks back on economic statements

www.msnbc.com...



Trump walks back attack on George Bush

www.washingtonexaminer.com...



posted on Jul, 12 2016 @ 01:34 PM
link   
a reply to: UnBreakable

Trump has FAR more gaffs that he hasn't walked back. He's still doubling down on that stupid wall and banning Muslims from the country for instance (he's since decided that blanket surveying of Muslims is a good idea too). Usually Trump doesn't even bother to walk his statements back; he just changes them later when his audience changes. Trump's message ends up being largely inconsistent and/or too vague to understand what he wants.




top topics



 
15
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join