It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: shooterbrody
It's ALL on Clinton...She blatantly lied UNDER OATH to Congress!
Who hasn't?
Now all that has to be proven is perjury, which has happened six times since about 1940.
Another waste of taxpayer dollars on a political snipe hunt.
One of those times was her husband!
Wrong (again.)
Bill Clinton was never convicted of perjury. Do you need a link to prove your mistake? Or do you want to look it up on your own?
Too bad we didn't get that 'Mea Culpa' Forum
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert
They don't have to prove anything to open an investigation.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert
I don't think Hillary will even be forced to testify about it. That said, there is more than enough evidence from Comeys statement and from Hillarys own mouth to justify an investigation.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert
I don't think Hillary will even be forced to testify about it. That said, there is more than enough evidence from Comeys statement and from Hillarys own mouth to justify an investigation.
Not really.
This is going to be another failure. They would have to prove she intended to lie.
Good luck with that.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert
I don't think Hillary will even be forced to testify about it. That said, there is more than enough evidence from Comeys statement and from Hillarys own mouth to justify an investigation.
Not really.
This is going to be another failure. They would have to prove she intended to lie.
Good luck with that.
Is there NO evidence she lied?
originally posted by: shooterbrody
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gryphon66
Another waste of taxpayer dollars on a political snipe hunt.
Not if Hillary testifies in front of congress again. She will have the opportunity to clarify her record.
She doesn't need to clear her record. We all know what the facts of the matter are.
I don't want to see more government waste and misuse of Constitutional power directed at a ridiculous doomed-to-fail pure partisan effort.
Facts?
Comey said she sent and recieved classified info.
Hillary said she did not.
Comey said she did not provide all work emails.
Hillary said she did.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert
They don't have to prove anything to open an investigation.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: shooterbrody
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert
I don't think Hillary will even be forced to testify about it. That said, there is more than enough evidence from Comeys statement and from Hillarys own mouth to justify an investigation.
Not really.
This is going to be another failure. They would have to prove she intended to lie.
Good luck with that.
Is there NO evidence she lied?
That is not the right question that needs to be asked. What you need to ask yourself is if she intended to lie in order to deceive.
The FBI couldn't find any proof of intent to charge her. Do you think this new investigation will find something the FBI could not?
It's a joke.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: shooterbrody
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert
I don't think Hillary will even be forced to testify about it. That said, there is more than enough evidence from Comeys statement and from Hillarys own mouth to justify an investigation.
Not really.
This is going to be another failure. They would have to prove she intended to lie.
Good luck with that.
Is there NO evidence she lied?
That is not the right question that needs to be asked. What you need to ask yourself is if she intended to lie in order to deceive.
The FBI couldn't find any proof of intent to charge her. Do you think this new investigation will find something the FBI could not?
It's a joke.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert
They don't have to prove anything to open an investigation.
When did we decide we shouldn't investigate and punish blatant wrongdoing from our high officials because it costs money?
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: shooterbrody
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gryphon66
Another waste of taxpayer dollars on a political snipe hunt.
Not if Hillary testifies in front of congress again. She will have the opportunity to clarify her record.
She doesn't need to clear her record. We all know what the facts of the matter are.
I don't want to see more government waste and misuse of Constitutional power directed at a ridiculous doomed-to-fail pure partisan effort.
Facts?
Comey said she sent and recieved classified info.
Hillary said she did not.
Comey said she did not provide all work emails.
Hillary said she did.
Further facts...
Comey said that the classified material was not "properly" marked and only contained the (c) denotation and it was not clear that Clinton or others understood that denotation to mean classified.
Comey said he had no reason to believe that Clinton intentionally lied at any point during her interviews with the FBI.
Comey said there was no indication that the emails that were not directly provided to the FBI were intentionally deleted or held back and that the "slack" they were found in could have easily been due to device crashes or server transitions...aka..emails regularly lost due to standard technical issues.
Again...Not defending Hillary...but those are Comeys actual, under oath, statements...reality matters.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: shooterbrody
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert
I don't think Hillary will even be forced to testify about it. That said, there is more than enough evidence from Comeys statement and from Hillarys own mouth to justify an investigation.
Not really.
This is going to be another failure. They would have to prove she intended to lie.
Good luck with that.
Is there NO evidence she lied?
That is not the right question that needs to be asked. What you need to ask yourself is if she intended to lie in order to deceive.
The FBI couldn't find any proof of intent to charge her. Do you think this new investigation will find something the FBI could not?
It's a joke.
So Is there NO evidence she lied?
If there is it justifies and investigation.
The FBI was not asked to find proof she lied.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert
They don't have to prove anything to open an investigation.
When did we decide we shouldn't investigate and punish blatant wrongdoing from our high officials because it costs money?
The GOP representatives that are calling for this investigation know it will be a flop. They understand the law and know it will be extremely hard to stick her with a perjury charge.
They are putting-on this spectacle to satisfy their Right Wing nut constituents. It's a dog and pony show.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert
They don't have to prove anything to open an investigation.
When did we decide we shouldn't investigate and punish blatant wrongdoing from our high officials because it costs money?
The GOP representatives that are calling for this investigation know it will be a flop. They understand the law and know it will be extremely hard to stick her with a perjury charge.
They are putting-on this spectacle to satisfy their Right Wing nut constituents. It's a dog and pony show.
But you've admitted she lied...and told the same lie under oath to congress and the American people.
We should just let that go...ignore it for everyone?...or just for Hillary Clinton?
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: introvert
It's amazing at how desparate the Right Wing has become.
They will never be able to get her on perjury.
But I bet they get 10 or 15 million votes away from her.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert
I don't think Hillary will even be forced to testify about it. That said, there is more than enough evidence from Comeys statement and from Hillarys own mouth to justify an investigation.
Not really.
This is going to be another failure. They would have to prove she intended to lie.
Good luck with that.
Is there NO evidence she lied?
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert
They don't have to prove anything to open an investigation.
When did we decide we shouldn't investigate and punish blatant wrongdoing from our high officials because it costs money?
The GOP representatives that are calling for this investigation know it will be a flop. They understand the law and know it will be extremely hard to stick her with a perjury charge.
They are putting-on this spectacle to satisfy their Right Wing nut constituents. It's a dog and pony show.
But you've admitted she lied...