It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: intrptr
It doesn't explain it tho, it just explains what happened after...
They shouldn't use the misleading "exactly what is evolution" then. Origins are a huge hole and why they continue to call it a theory.
Ergo, evolution is one of the best supported models in the history of science.
Abiogenesis is a different thing altogether. The model of abiogenesis is incomplete. We can produce RNA in a laboratory from organic compounds present on the early earth, but we cannot create a living cell -- not yet.
originally posted by: olbe66
a reply to: secretboss
Well, I fully agree with Richard Dawkins theory that extraterrestrials may have seeded life on earth, and that life on earth may contain the signature of an intelligent designer.
OK - you are familiar with Dawkins and post this question? I'm over with be gentile - you're just trolling boss - no quarter.
Abiogenesis is the origin of life, fun stuff, cool ideas, no one knows for sure. This is where the debate is.