It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Nikola014
I think you guys are pretty scared of Trump actually knowing what to talk about when the time is right. If you seriously think that he got that wealthy while being almost as dumb as hillary( that is if we believe she was careless when dealing with things that could have a huge impact on american national security ), then you will get a huge wake up call.
Trump knows what he's fighting for, and I know he is more than capable of destroying that criminal, who's not in jail only because her last name is Clinton.
Former President Bill Clinton was a much more frequent flyer on a registered sex offender’s infamous jet than previously reported, with flight logs showing the former president taking at least 26 trips aboard the “Lolita Express” -- even apparently ditching his Secret Service detail for at least five of the flights, according to records obtained by FoxNews.com. Clinton’s presence aboard Jeffrey Epstein’s Boeing 727 on 11 occasions has been reported, but flight logs show the number is more than double that, and trips between 2001 and 2003 included extended junkets around the world with Epstein and fellow passengers identified on manifests by their initials or first names, including “Tatiana.” The tricked-out jet earned its Nabakov-inspired nickname because it was reportedly outfitted with a bed where passengers had group sex with young girls.
Virginia Roberts, 32, who claims she was pimped out by Epstein at age 15, has previously claimed she saw Clinton at Epstein’s getaway in 2002, but logs do not show Clinton aboard any flights to St. Thomas, the nearest airport capable of accommodating Epstein's plane. They do show Clinton flying aboard Epstein’s plane to such destinations as Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, China, Brunei, London, New York, the Azores, Belgium, Norway, Russia and Africa. Among those regularly traveling with Clinton were Epstein’s associates, New York socialite Ghislaine Maxwell and Epstein’s assistant, Sarah Kellen, both of whom were investigated by the FBI and Palm Beach Police for recruiting girls for Epstein and his friends.
originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: introvert
You guys are saying that Trump is stupid and won't be able to match with hillary on a intellectual level. Which is not true.
I am eager to see how's that criminal from the Clinton family going to deal with someone who calls things as they are, without caring about offending someone and being politically correct.
And honestly, you don't actually believe that you can make billions without knowing how government work?
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: Sillyolme
She's going to get called out on every single lie she over told.
And so is Donald Trump for that matter. I'm particularly interested in his friendship with Jeffery Epstein.
ELECTION 2016 Trump's Attorney Says Child Rape Allegations Have 'Absolutely No Merit' Unsurprisingly, he calls the allegations "politically motivated." By William Boardman / Reader Supported News July 10, 2016 AddThis Sharing Buttons Print 91 COMMENTS Photo Credit: Art by Nancy Ohanian “The allegations are not only categorically false, but disgusting at the highest level and clearly framed to solicit media attention or, more likely, are politically motivated. To be clear, there is absolutely no merit to these claims and, based on our investigation, no evidence that the person who has made these allegations actually exists.”– Alan Garten, corporate attorney for Donald Trump, April 28, 2016 The federal lawsuit, titled Katie Johnson v. Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein, accuses Trump and Epstein of rape and other sexual assaults during the summer of 1994, when plaintiff was 13 years old. Attorney Garten denied the accusations and cast doubt on the existence of the plaintiff. Attorney Garten’s denial of rape claims against Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein dates from April 2016, when the case was filed by a “Katie Johnson,” a possible pseudonym, on April 26 in U.S. District Court in Riverdale, California (home of plaintiff). The case, apparently filed pro se by the plaintiff, acting without a lawyer, sought $100 million in damages from defendants for, among other things, violating her Civil Rights and “by making her their sex slave.” The case appears to have been first reported online by DailyMail.com, which included Garten’s denial as well as a sampling of the lurid details of the allegations. Other early coverage appears to have been limited to other online news sites including RADAR online, Winning Democrats, Sunday Express, AntiMedia.org and NYDailyNews.com. Less than a week after the case was filed under federal Civil Rights statutes, a federal judge ruled that it was a mistake and dismissed the case. On May 2, citing the Civil Rights basis of the suit, the judge wrote: “Even construing the … pleading liberally, Plaintiff has not alleged any race-based or class-based animus against her, and consequently, her … allegations fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.” The dismissal received even less coverage than the filing. RADAR online reported: “Judge Trashes Bogus Donald Trump Rape Lawsuit,” even though the judge had ruled only on the terms of the filing, not on any of the substance of the case as “bogus” or otherwise. Once dismissed, however, the case was over, at least for the moment. Plaintiff could have re-filed the complaint in correct form in California. Instead she apparently found a lawyer to file for her in New York, the home state of both defendants.
Trump associated with someone subsequently convicted as a sexual predator. He has said more than once that he is attracted to his daughter. He has had a lawsuit filed against him for rape. A witness, who was a long time associate of a convicted predator, has said she witnessed Donald Trump raping a thirteen year old girl.
This thread is suggesting that Trump himself, who has suggested that Hillary Clinton may be vulnerable to blackmail, is himself possibly vulnerable to blackmail. This is not slander.