It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Actually, you do. Because if my premises are correct then the conclusions are correct. Again, right now you are just saying "nu-uh."
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Aristotelian1
No, I'm giving my opinion on why I disagree with your conclusion and initial hypothesis. I don't have to specifically address points in your argument to make a reasoned disagreement with your conclusion.
originally posted by: Aristotelian1
Actually, you do. Because if my premises are correct then the conclusions are correct. Again, right now you are just saying "nu-uh."
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Aristotelian1
No, I'm giving my opinion on why I disagree with your conclusion and initial hypothesis. I don't have to specifically address points in your argument to make a reasoned disagreement with your conclusion.
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: Mianeye
HOWEVER with that being said there needs to be some sort of mental screening before these people can get guns. It's already been shown a good chunk of shooters have mental issues. Me personally? I cannot understand why such measures don't ALREADY EXIST
Since mental illness develops over time, I mean that crazy people are not born crazy, how often do you test everyone?
Every year?
Every day?
No...you give everyone guns and wait for Darwin to sort it out....
I asked a serious question, hoping for a serious answer.
Since I didn't get one, what am I left to think?
Maybe my question was too difficult.