I have been researching the events that took place in Dallas non-stop. I have been reading, watching, and listening to everything that comes to light.
From the start of the event, the police department, police scanners, media, and eyewitnesses all claimed that there were multiple shooters. A couple
of days pass, and we arrive at the official narrative being conveniently molded into a lone wolf black supremacist shooter. Even worse, the shooter is
a veteran. We already know that DHS already targets vets as terror suspects. What a simple and easy way to further that agenda. Other than the mass
reports of multiple shooters, we also have the Dallas Police department stating that the rifle used was an SKS. I thought this was fishy to begin
with, as the SKS comes standard with a built in 10 round magazine that can then be modified to take AK-47 rounds.
Now here is the kicker! Today images were leaked of Micah Xavier Johnson's corpse, along with a very clear image of his rifle.... AN AK-74! These two
firearms take completely different rounds. The crime scene investigation is already long under way, which would include the services of
ballistics/munitions experts. I find it hard to believe that they would make the "mistake" of reporting on the incorrect caliber rounds.
The images of the body and the video of the shootout that we see clearly differ. The image of the deceased clearly shows him wearing a greenish-brown
pair of pants. In the shootout, the pants he is wearing are very clearly white. youtu.be...
What do you guys think? I think that this clearly shows major that the official story is not adding up.
Well I have seen another video that does clearly identify sniper rounds by audio, at the same time as the SKS gun which seemed to have explosive
rounds, at the time of the policeman seen getting killed by the shooter on the ground, even with all the reverberation going on because of the
buildings, which can fool you into thinking multiple shooters. But there were also a load of police around the corner, so it's more than likely they
were shooting too, but did they have a target?
There is also the problem of media reports saying that there were suspects under arrest, and that they weren't talking...did media make that up?
I have been researching the events that took place in Dallas non-stop. I have been reading, watching, and listening to everything that comes to
From your basement behind a keyboard?
Oh good, internet 'forensics'. Mix with the thousand others that do that and you get constipated stew.
I'm sure plenty of "reveals" have come from Internet research..
That said deciding that the differences between the initial reports, which the media throws out with little or no verification and the actual facts
revealed after the fact are proof of a conspiracy is pretty flipping thin....
How have all those other black flag operations attempting to push gun control worked out??
Sure it does, especially to us. We are talking about official police reports and official statements given by the Dallas director of the department of
homeland security, who would not comment if they did not have evidence of an SKS.
How do the police answer if they do not have the answer at a press release?
"I cannot comment as there is still an ongoing investigation."
We are talking about federal and state investigators, many of whom are ballistics and firearms experts. If they have evidence of an SKS, they have
evidence of an SKS. The firearm we see at the scene of death is clearly not an SKS.
It's very simple. Police personnel are just like us. Human. That means they can make mistakes, just like the rest of us. Maybe when it was found there
wasn't anyone there who knew what it really was, but remembered what an SKS looked like and the ak-74 does resemble one. It wasn't till later, when it
was examined by a professional on rifles, that it was found to be what it was.
They do. We will see what comes out over the next few days. I am not claiming to know everything.
My guess? They are going to claim to have found an SKS in his home, and an AK-74 at the site. Or they will claim that he used a couple of different
rifles and dropped them later as he moved through the streets.
The only question I have is the police description of a triangulated attack on them in the area as it was happening. How could one person get to 3
different buildings at high level, not get seen doing so, and get all them shots off to make it seem like a triangulated attack?
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.