It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

I'm a Physicist at CERN We've Done Something We Shouldn't Have Done

page: 18
45
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 11 2016 @ 02:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: StargateSG7

But you can't possibly be the least bit right even to the degree of a gnat's fart's worth.

Because . . . . uhhhhh . . . because . . .

The omniscient ones on this thread insist that you HAVE to be thoroughly wrong and ignorant . . .

because . . . . uhhhh . . . just because they said so.


---

Kinda helps my cousin WORKS THERE at CERN
and has for the last 20 years as one of the big
egghead hotshots! He only has degrees with
majors in Nuclear Chemistry (B. Sc), Physics (Ph.D),
Computer Science (Ms.C) so I would say he is pretty
educated on the matters of CERN's operations.
It also helps that has designed High Energy
Laser Systems for Hot Fusion Reactors.
So yeah I would kinda take his words mostly at face value.
He Kinda, Sorta, Maybe agrees with MY CONCERNS...
especially the one about the negative attraction
quark-gluon plasma.........




posted on Jul, 11 2016 @ 02:58 PM
link   
Looking at the history of the occult trying to open portals to hell to bring on the apocalypse goes back to John Dee in the 16th century along the way there has been plenty of others L Ron Hubbard, Edward Kelly and Alistair Crowley included all of these occultists would give even Phage a run in terms of letters and intelligence yet the occult or the hint of it is poo pooed now by the masses,you haven't even gone into this side of things and you have only asked to discuss the possibilities in the video you have not stated you believe them unequivocally.A topic like this attracts all those here whom like to lob all guns blazing to destroy the messanger and message thats why the ufo and paranormal threads are now dead because of a bunch of a bunch of people whose only spiritual experience has been a constipated dump who believe whatever bs science and tptb tells them.



posted on Jul, 11 2016 @ 03:05 PM
link   
a reply to: blueman12

Not for most of those I tend to write for.



posted on Jul, 11 2016 @ 03:08 PM
link   
a reply to: StargateSG7

CONGRATS.

I love having a source on the inside!

Has he seen this video?

www.youtube.com...


What do you think he's say about it?

Thanks for your interesting inputs. Love it.



posted on Jul, 11 2016 @ 03:10 PM
link   
INDEED.

WHAT YOU SAID!

But we musn't confuse with facts those who worship at the altar of the corrupt Religion of Scientism. They might get OFFENDED or even MORE vengeful than usual.

I notice they didn't want to touch the JPL Parsons occult stuff very meaningfully or accurately at all.

Hypocritical Chickens.

Worth repeating with emphasis & a bit more punctuation for shorter, less run-on sentences and more paragraphing:


originally posted by: khnum
Looking at the history of the occult trying to open portals to hell to bring on the apocalypse goes back to John Dee in the 16th century.
.
Along the way there has been plenty of others: L Ron Hubbard, Edward Kelly and Alistair Crowley included. All of these occultists would give even Phage a run in terms of letters and intelligence. Yet the occult or the hint of it is poo pooed now by the masses.
.
You haven't even gone into this side of things and you have only [been] asked to discuss the possibilities in the video you have not stated you believe them unequivocally.
.
A topic like this attracts all those here whom like to lob all guns blazing to destroy the messenger and message. That's why the UFO and paranormal threads are now dead because of a bunch of a bunch of people whose only spiritual experience has been a constipated dump [and] who believe whatever BS science TPTB tells them
.


Now, now. Don't you realize that their omniscience and omnipotence simply CANNOT be challenged?

Else they resort to even MORE 2 year old level fit throwing.

edit on 11/7/2016 by BO XIAN because: added

edit on 11/7/2016 by BO XIAN because: tags

edit on 11/7/2016 by BO XIAN because: (no reason given)

edit on 11/7/2016 by BO XIAN because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 11 2016 @ 03:30 PM
link   
a reply to: BO XIAN



the good stuff only comes after initiation and faithful fellowship, relationship and dialogue over time.


Your above statement sounds plausible, but a study of the scriptures make it plain
there are exceptions the good stuff as you describe has been revealed to men
called to be prophets, even when there's no history of faithful fellowship.

Such as a Pharisee man named Saul, who's name would be turned to Paul.
I know of no prophet who has revealed more 'good stuff' than this man.

Also unless I'm mistaken the prophets Moses and David show no record of past
fellowship before they were chosen.

God calls prophets not because they have proven faithful fellowship
or service, but simply because they have been chosen before the
foundation of the world to fulfill His Word.

I have a strong feeling also the two witnesses of Revelation will
probably be drunken bums living under a bridge before they are
chosen, simply because God loves to chose the foolish things of
the world to confound the wise, and chooses the weak things of
the world to confound the things which are mighty.









edit on 7/11/2016 by MrBlaq because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 11 2016 @ 04:18 PM
link   
a reply to: MrBlaq

Good points.

I think I have noted recently that God does seem to enjoy HIS exceptions to His patterns.

Thanks for your input.



posted on Jul, 11 2016 @ 05:21 PM
link   
a reply to: tsurfer2000h

We who? Who Are you speaking for?



posted on Jul, 11 2016 @ 05:24 PM
link   
a reply to: tsurfer2000h

Name 5 physicists who say so and, as always, proof or it doesn't exist.

I know shyte from shynola. Recognize it on sight.



posted on Jul, 11 2016 @ 05:24 PM
link   
a reply to: BO XIAN

Amen, BoX!



posted on Jul, 11 2016 @ 05:26 PM
link   
a reply to: MrBlaq

You are wise. I like that.




posted on Jul, 11 2016 @ 06:43 PM
link   
a reply to: BO XIAN




OBVIOUSLY YOUUUUUUUUUU KNOW sooooooooooooooooooooooo much more about what was IN MY HEAD and IN MY HEART when I wrote my point #7 than I did. OF COURSE you MUST be correct about what I said, what I meant, what I intended. Particularly given your omniscience and all. /sarc


You make me smile...


It's fun watching you try and change your stance on this and that makes me smile...


Those who see you and this thread for what it is are smiling at watching you for over 15 pages try and defend the OP...and that makes me smile...


Thanks for making me smile...



posted on Jul, 11 2016 @ 06:46 PM
link   
a reply to: NewzNose




We who? Who Are you speaking for?


Didn't read the thread did you, because if you had you wouldn't find the need to ask such a question.

I suggest page 1 and go from there.



posted on Jul, 11 2016 @ 07:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: StargateSG7

CONGRATS.

I love having a source on the inside!

Has he seen this video?

www.youtube.com...


What do you think he's say about it?

Thanks for your interesting inputs. Love it.


===

I will send him the link and hopefully get a reply.
I CAN tell you however some relatively "Inside Physics"
discussion and very low-level suppositions that SOME of the
scientists who have worked at CERN are starting to believe:

1) The Universe is a Running Computational Model.
Technically we're in a giant Matrix with FEW rules
governing the basics of all matter and energy.

2) The BEST book to explain this so far is
"A New Kind of Science" by Stephen Wolfram
(i've got a copy myself sitting on my bookshelf!)
which posits that "The Universe and Everything"
is governed by "Code" and has only simple rules
that ITERATE over time from basic starting points
forming a curve that will EITHER eventually circle
in on itself (Big Crunch) or expand logarithmically
(Expanding Universe) until the BASE CPU fails
(i.e. universal substrate or computational engine).

3) Since the Universe is quite literally "Bits and Bytes"
code CAN be modified at Runtime (while we're living!),
so on technical basis the Matrix movie got it right where
we can "bend or break" the rules of physics (up to a point!).

4) It is likely the starting inputs (i.e. initial universal constants and variables)
are basically a number, a 4D-XYZT position, a velocity, an attraction/repulsion value
and a spin value, so it is ALSO LIKELY that OTHER "Source Code Instances" and
their starting inputs and variables WERE or ARE running which would define
ALTERNATE but separate universes running in another "memory space".
Research the computer term Hypervisor and you'll get the idea.
While these instances are sandboxed, it MAY be possible to
"Cut and Paste" bits and pieces between universes which
posits the idea we CAN see or even MOVE between universes
IF their local environment is conducive to our own "running code".

5) The computer code running this universe SEEMS to be fractal
in nature (i.e. self-similar at various scales), so it is VERY LIKELY
that VERY SIMILAR and MULTIPLE instances of us humans and other
"Alien Beings" have been iterated through and are running right now
elsewhere in the universe AND HAVE EXISTED PREVIOUSLY
and will CONTINUE to evolve in the future. So mathematically,
"A Long, Long Time Ago in a Galaxy Far, Far Away..." is LIKELY
to be Science Fact and NOT Science Fiction!

6) Discrete Math functions are generally computable on
Equivalent systems...ERGO...Artificial Intelligence is
not only POSSIBLE but is probably "Been There! Done That."
Since I can run any given math function on a Commodore 64,
a TI Calculator, a Mac, a Smartphone or a Windows machine
at various speeds and get nearly the same or the same result,
that indicates that the human brain's hardware is FULLY
COMPUTABLE and EMULATABLE on disparate hardware.

7) Iterative Math Functions give rise to relatively computable
complexity and visible organization. Therefore, it seems possible
that a SMALL PORTION of the Universe can be computed and
have it's rules, variables and constants determined at the
macro level. Ergo, human science can eventually turn us
into masters of our local time and space domain which
means OTHERS have likely done so in the past and we
just have to find the purposeful or accidental breadcrumbs
of their civilizations that they have left behind.

8) There is PROBABLY a near duplicate of our human
civilization both closeby AND far away which are
above, below or at our immediate technological
capabilities and cultural development. That means
we need to be CAREFUL OUT THERE IN OUTER SPACE
because there is a GREAT likelihood "They" are just
like us....which is a SCARY THOUGHT!!!!!

9) Iterative functions that compute the current state
of the universe use and save their results into ARRAYS
of multiple dimensions thate can be stored for a short time
or a LONG TIME. Example:

Humans = Array[ 1..N ] of Time Slices[ 1..X ] of Single_Persons_Life[ 1..Y ] Circle_OF_Friends.

that above data structure is called a multi-dimensional array.
And in computer science I can IMMEDIATELY JUMP to ANY
single ELEMENT on ANY lower or upper dimension MERELY
by changing my indexing values. This means that on a
technical basis we SHOULD BE ABLE to wormhole our way
into ANY geographical location in space AND/OR any temporal
location (depending on our how long the universal computation
engine STORES the array results in RAM memory and or DISK memory).
This means we humans SHOULD BE ABLE to create and use hyperdrives
and read-only (i.e. view only) time machines!

10) You can PAUSE running code, loop it, EXIT IT PERMANENTLY
or even run it BACKWARDS! So as I write this "God" could
have hit the pause button, waited for 20 Quadrillion years,
then unpaused me and my typing, and I would NEVER klnow about it!
The scary part to me is the Universal Exit() routine where our
universe (on a mathematical basis) is STOPPED and exited back
out to the base operating system and we humans would be
mere bytes in the wind.


Hope that helps!



edit on 2016/7/11 by StargateSG7 because: sp



posted on Jul, 11 2016 @ 07:28 PM
link   
a reply to: StargateSG7

THANKS MUCH.

THAT was VERY interesting.

I even understood most of it! At least minimally! LOL.

Evidently Dr Chuck Missler has bought into that explanation. He was a DOD info science Annapolis grad, then Air Force officer and then GS something or other, IIRC.

Nevertheless, imho, God expects us to relate to all we see, observe, feel, sense . . . as though IT IS as we seem to observe it with our natural eyes. My drift is that He finds the testing, training and refinements to our character and values within those boundaries quite sufficient without getting into any matrix stuff.



posted on Jul, 11 2016 @ 07:35 PM
link   
a reply to: NewzNose




Name 5 physicists who say so and, as always, proof or it doesn't exist.


Steven Hawkings

Neil deGrasse Tyson

Andre' David...Just in case you don't know who he is...

ch.linkedin.com...

Kate Kahl...just in case you don't know who she is...


Ms. Kahle, who has a degree in physics


www.wsj.com...

Anwar Bhatti...just in case you don't know who he is...

www.linkedin.com...

Now show me five actual physicists that say it is doing what you think it is?



I know shyte from shynola. Recognize it on sight.


You should your good at pushing it especially in this thread...



posted on Jul, 11 2016 @ 08:14 PM
link   
a reply to: BO XIAN

BO, you have lost all credibility and respect from myself on these forums.

Your use and choice of words come off very childish and immature at times, as well it's obvious, you try to cover your own mistakes or lies..

It's really sad. You seem to behave like a dog backed in a corner at times, for whatever reasons. The average poster in the opening pages were looking for honesty and civil exchange.

I do not think you delivered on either, and thus made a fool of yourself.

As you said, rather then poke the dog, I'll just walk on by any thread authored by yourself knowing its most likely dishonest or bias.

Cheers



posted on Jul, 11 2016 @ 08:25 PM
link   
a reply to: Elementalist

Why THANK YOU.

Nice to know I still have the skill for making a fool of myself.

I don't know that I'm all that significant.

And if my content can't stand on its own, then toss it.

Lots of people--particularly of certain personalities and backgrounds--have derisively trashed and cast me aside much of my life. You're part of a club of more than 3 or 4.

Thankfully, there are a number of folks who do GROK me. And that's a wonderful contrast. LOLOL.

I am a bit puzzled by the dishonest slam by some. But . . . what do I know.

I'm normally pretty candid and vulnerable. I can't hide my emotions face to face and don't try very hard to do so on the net. It may take a lot to convince me I've been or done wrong but if I can see it, I try to be quick to admit it.


edit on 11/7/2016 by BO XIAN because: added



posted on Jul, 11 2016 @ 09:15 PM
link   
Cool story bro. not much else to say. People go out of their way to retire early.



posted on Jul, 11 2016 @ 09:24 PM
link   
a reply to: StargateSG7

Oh snap!

I put on my hyper-visor and coded the alternate universe into Barnstain Bears!!!!

Great post, I'll have to check out Wolfram.




top topics



 
45
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join