It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

I'm a Physicist at CERN We've Done Something We Shouldn't Have Done

page: 1
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

+2 more 
posted on Jul, 9 2016 @ 11:14 PM

This is something I ?inadvertantly? ?coincidentally? ?synergistically? happened onto via a YOUTUBE on a very different topic (Putin).

I think it is a good follow-up to this thread:

My notes:

--The public was fed one narrative--understanding the universe . . . but 'the Family' and the governments knew the truth. Most of the scientists at CERN were kept completely in the dark.

--The collider would perform it's function normally . . . the more nefarious function would only be tested in the presence of THE FAMILY and a few select scientists. I am a member of THE FAMILY for my division . . .

--This is not what the machine was designed for . . . 2nd to open a doorway.

--UFO phenomenon . . . from another planet? . . . another time? . . . no . . . our universe but one page in a large book . . . our page is not the only one. Every page represents another universe . . . no page to interact with another . . . each page a universe unto itself . . .

--The book idea was finally cemented . . . the mathematics were there . . . also showing it was impossible for one page to interact with another . . . then . . . theoretically . . . with enough power, we could open a door to interact with a page next to ours . . . .

--EU, USA AND CHINA . . . were shown the plans . . . a doorway would be opened . . . government leaders threw endless money . . .

--but now, there is a new younger, more eager bunch of scientists and officials very eager to prove themselves . . .

--now allow me to tell you what happened last Thursday . . . around 1900 . . . most of the team filtered out of the observation room and the machine had been put in its usual standby mode . . .

--my badge display went off . . . I knew right away what they were going to attempt . . . we both understood and left . . .

--the room looked completely normal . . . As Celine & I made our way from the Collider . . . they always like doing these on clear nights . . .

--the RFID chip in our badges triggered the elevator doors to open before we pressed the button . . .

--We made our way to the Board room . . . The Family was in session . . . woman designated THE FATHER as she was giving orders . . . We had gone through several fathers . . . lots of billions had been spent but we had not opened a door. . . . tonight we'd try 40 TEV . . . some with feigned excitement some with disbelief . . . we'd never tried anything this high . . . the head of the dept tasked with certifying whether the machine could manage such a level . . . Celine . . . we . . . can't just throw the collider to the highest setting and hope for the best . . . Father . . . asked . . . ignoring Celine . . . meet in the control room in 2200 hours.

--if the experiment was successful . . . could we close a door opened at 40 TEV?

--with the FAMILY assembled in the control room . . . FATHER ISSUED THE SIMPLE ORDER: "BEGIN."

--We are approaching 30 TEV . . . FATHER--INCREASE TO 35 TEV . . . We all continued to look at one another . . . with more concern . . . at 38 TEV, no specific structural signs were noticed. 40 TEV was achieved and we were sustaining it . . .

--as the particle clouds were passing one another . . . the room began to get warmer . . . shut the machine down someone said from the family . . . FATHER continued . . . . Everything going well except the temperature that had started at 20 was now 35 . . .

--FATHER said: Commence the collision sequence . . . collision in 4, 3, 2 the methodical voice announced over the intercom . . .

--an ethereal blinding light consumed the room. I had never experienced anything like this before. The temperature dropped back down to 20 degrees. And the light was overpowering us. We couldn't see our own hands in front of our faces. Suddenly there was a blood curdling scream--like someone being horribly beaten, followed by total silence and then darkness. Celine was shouting form her side of the room. I called back: SOUND OFF [names and code] . . .

--the emergency red light bathed the room . . . we still had not heard FATHER sound off. We turned to the chair FATHER had sat in. There was a lump there. I went and turned the breaker . . . nothing was out of place . . . she's gone . . . however, a pile of FATHER'S EFFECTS were in her chair--her jewelry, her clothes . . . She had vanished into thin air. Prepare now for the terror ahead. . . John 3:16 Hosea 2:16

= = =


1. My standard stance is: THE FLAKIEST groups, sources MOST ACCURATELY and EARLIEST IDENTIFIED who Hitler was and what he would become and do. I very much believe my Boss about that. He was THE world's expert on the materials supporting that fact.

2. It is only logical. The REGULAR sources are FAR TOO CONTROLLED with FAR TOO MUCH TO LOSE to let the REALLY LEADING EDGE, JUICY STUFF OUT. It is many decades after Roswell and the officials are seemingly little to no closer to disclosure willingly.

3. OF COURSE anonymous sources; mysterious whistle blowers etc. risking their lives and families to reveal startling things to the world would be the only or at least the earliest sources of really strange stuff.

4. OF COURSE they CANNOT afford to offer conventional proof and will not do so. THAT'S A GIVEN. Expecting anything else is stupidity, irrational, clueless and ignorant. This many decades from Roswell, they still have not done so with any level of absolutely trustworthy CONVENTIONAL "proof."


6. The video AS PRESENTED is plausible in at least some respects. My own tendency is to take things at face value until PROVEN otherwise--while avoiding being so open minded that my brains fall out.

7. OF COURSE, it could be a hoax; a delusion of grandeur; a game by a bright young adult etc. etc. etc.


= = = =

9. So, let us PRETEND that it IS exactly as stated.


10. What do you think the implications are?

11. What do you think happened to "FATHER."

12. Why was THE FATHER 'chosen?'

13. Why the blood curdling scream?

14. IF YOU were said scientist thinking of disclosing this narrative via a computerized voice narration . . . would you follow-through? Would you risk your own life and probably the life of your blood family? Why? Why not?

15. Do you think there will be more "tall tales" about CERN?

16. Or, will they TRY to stuff the genie back in the bottle? Will they be able to?

17. What do you speculate will be next about CERN?

18. We have been dinking around with "the tree of the knowledge of good and evil" for millennia. I don't see us hesitating, regardless of the risks. Man is THAT arrogant. He deludes himself that HE CAN ride the dragon with impunity and increased power and status. He is wrong.

+90 more 
posted on Jul, 9 2016 @ 11:16 PM

My own tendency is to take things at face value until PROVEN otherwise--while avoiding being so open minded that my brains fall out.
You failed.

Accepting any claim at all with no evidence is not being open minded. It is letting your brain fall out.

edit on 7/9/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)

+21 more 
posted on Jul, 9 2016 @ 11:23 PM
a reply to: Phage

Ahhhhhhhhh I see your addiction to your marriage to risking the virtual certainty of a false negative error in your terror to avoid a false positive REMAINS FIRMLY IN PLACE AND IN !!!CONTROL!!!.

Sounds like your brains may not be as solidly in place as you assume them to be.

You are smart enough to KNOW that it is

UNscientific to be sooooooooooooo wedded to avoiding a false positive error

soooooooooooooo absolutely and extensively that you make it essentially certain that you WILL fall prey to a false negative.

You must have a lot of trophies to your collected false negatives, so far.

= = = =

BTW, I think your post is a REAL CHEAP SHOT

without watching the video.

edit on 9/7/2016 by BO XIAN because: left out

+27 more 
posted on Jul, 9 2016 @ 11:24 PM
a reply to: BO XIAN

BTW, I think your post is a REAL CHEAP SHOT

without watching the video.
oooo. Colors. Neat.
There is nothing to watch. There is a synthesized voice telling a story.

+10 more 
posted on Jul, 9 2016 @ 11:25 PM
a reply to: Phage


You automatically and arbitrarily

EXCLUDE several classes of evidence.

You tolerate ONLY an extremely narrow and rigid slice of evidence.

That's rather unimpressive.

Your brain is more capable than that.

+10 more 
posted on Jul, 9 2016 @ 11:26 PM
a reply to: BO XIAN

I actually read this somewhere (not a transcript, but the actual writings of the alleged CERN "Family" member about this. To me, it felt like a great script, but unlikely. I'll try to find a link, if I do, I'll post it.

That said, I do believe CERN has something far stranger going on than what is discussed publicly. The weird occult symbolism employed, etc. - I think people "know" something is up with CERN, which is birthing many stories, theories and suburban legends.

ALSO... You ruined my fun! I thought this was going to be a thread by a brand new member who was going to make some ridiculous claims for us. I was going to pretend I was a co-worker and ask if he borrowed my particle wrench.

ETA: This was the text I read awhile back (linkage below). It's an entertaining read. Those robot voice videos make me want to go on a throat-punching rampage. It's a mobile link. If it doesn't work on PCs, try changing the m.reddit... to www.reddit...

reddit link
edit on 7/9/2016 by dogstar23 because: Link

+31 more 
posted on Jul, 9 2016 @ 11:27 PM
a reply to: BO XIAN

You automatically and arbitrarily

EXCLUDE several classes of evidence.
Automatically? Yes.
Arbitrarily? No.

I do automatically dismiss stories being told with synthesized voices in youtube videos. But then, such things are not actually evidence. Are they?

+3 more 
posted on Jul, 9 2016 @ 11:28 PM
a reply to: Phage

BTW, Have you ever been around a woman persistently

who . . . had a VERY ACCURATE AND EFFECTIVE intuition operating routinely in her life?

+8 more 
posted on Jul, 9 2016 @ 11:30 PM
a reply to: Phage

According to YOUR definition.

NOT according to mine.

Just because evidence is tricky to evaluate does NOT MAKE IT NON-EVIDENCE.

It may be convenient for you and help you sleep nights. But it is NOT REAL, to do so, to me.

EVERYTHING that crosses our perceptual capacities

is evidence.

DENIAL of that is . . . simply . . .


+7 more 
posted on Jul, 9 2016 @ 11:31 PM

originally posted by: BO XIAN
BTW, I think your post is a REAL CHEAP SHOT

without watching the video.

I haven't watched the video either, but just from reading the summary, I'd have to disagree.

+16 more 
posted on Jul, 9 2016 @ 11:31 PM

originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: Phage

BTW, Have you ever been around a woman persistently

who . . . had a VERY ACCURATE AND EFFECTIVE intuition operating routinely in her life?

Does this have something to do high energy physics?

+24 more 
posted on Jul, 9 2016 @ 11:34 PM
a reply to: BO XIAN

I think if you SCREAM A LITTLE LOUDER you might win this debate.

At least you'll have more people respect you.

posted on Jul, 9 2016 @ 11:35 PM
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

What a shocking unsurprise.

posted on Jul, 9 2016 @ 11:36 PM
a reply to: Phage

If the woman is a high energy physicist, probably.

+11 more 
posted on Jul, 9 2016 @ 11:38 PM
a reply to: pl3bscheese

And you are such a gold medal mind reader that

you just KNOW that my textual stuff = SCREAMING

instead of

--a raised tone
--raised eyebrows
--a slowed cadence of speech
--a speeded cadence of speech
--an altered facial expression

. . . for emphasis.

But, hey, far be it for me to suggest you avoid following the lemmings about net conventions.


+12 more 
posted on Jul, 9 2016 @ 11:40 PM
I'm listening now, a lame hoax.

posted on Jul, 9 2016 @ 11:41 PM
When presented with a story, and no other evidence, I am the type of person that will evaluate the story. Best case scenario, I consider a story plausible and keep it on the back shelf in my brain waiting for confirming evidence, and I will always give it a small amount of merit. Worst case scenario, I will call a story bullshyte and not give it any credenc until multiple types of evidence prove it's true. This story falls in the bull side of the spectrum, not because of the subject matter itself, necessarily, but because of the way the story is told. This story was written by a wanna be sci first writer. I have to disagree with dog star even, because it doesn't sound like a script (not enough dialogue, too many long paragraphs of descriptions). It's a written fiction, and with a bit of work and a good editor, it might eventually be a good story.

But, bottom line is it sounds nothing like the way real people talk. It's written like a writer writes. If you think I'm wrong, think back on the most fuxxed up story anybody told you about what happened to them at work, and talk them into writing the story as a Facebook post. It's going to sound totally different, and a lot more genuine, and there's not going to be any pointless tangents about trips down the elevator. The story won't end on a cliffhanger, either. That's something only writers do.

(post by pl3bscheese removed for a manners violation)
+1 more 
posted on Jul, 9 2016 @ 11:42 PM
a reply to: Phage

It's always fascinating to me . . . that in your tenacious rush to pin others to the wall over often petty details that don't meet your criteria of "proof,"

you have yet to deal adequately with the







I thought you were more intellectually honest than that.

posted on Jul, 9 2016 @ 11:43 PM

off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


new topics

top topics

<<   2  3  4 >>

log in