It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Brilliant Light Power Demonstration, June 28th 2016

page: 16
12
<< 13  14  15    17  18 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 1 2016 @ 12:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
a reply to: ignorant_ape

All you have to do is watch the videos to see where the money went.



They spent $20,000,000 on YouTube videos? Rough deal.




posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 10:29 AM
link   
I just read through the latest BrLP presentation event notes and found their current planned development and production timeline.

BrLP has contracted with Columbia Tech to have them do the prototype and manufacturing workups. CT's Chief Technology Officer is projecting initial field testing of prototype units to take place in 6 months, with pilot commercial units available 6 months after initial field testing completes. Phase 1A design began on November 1st. They are projecting the prototype units to produce 100 kW of power.

Masimo Semiconductor is responsible for creating the commercial photovoltaic converter comprising a denser receiver array of concentrator multijunction photovoltaic cells that will wrap around the black-body light source. Masimo's Head of Business Development is projecting the photovoltaic array to ready for the prototype field test on time.

Looking at the slide notes from Masimo, they are projecting 15.5kW output for the first prototype, and 28.5kW for the second prototype.

Here's Masimo's published timeline:

-Week 1: July 27, 2016…. Masimo Semi currently under TPV Cell contract and drawings
-Week 10: Oct 19, 2016…..Masimo Semi currently under gDRA prototype development contract
-Week 14: Nov 4, 2016…..1-Junction Cells on GaAs & InP complete
-Week 16: Nov 18, 2016….gDRA Prototype 3-D model complete
-Week 24: Jan 13, 2017….gDRA Prototype (1-J) Single TRU complete
-Week 28: Feb 17, 2017…. 2-Junction Cells on GaAs or InP complete (requires contract)
-Week 40: May 7, 2017….gDRA Prototype (2-Junction Cells) complete (requires contract)



edit on 11/2/2016 by AnarchoCapitalist because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 10:44 AM
link   
a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

Oh look, more unsourced spam. I ask again, do you work for BLP?



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 10:51 AM
link   
a reply to: GetHyped

Masimo's Brad Siskavich was nice enough to include his contact info on his slide presentation if you'd like to ask him questions about it.



edit on 11/2/2016 by AnarchoCapitalist because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 10:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: AnarchoCapitalist

Oh look, more unsourced spam. I ask again, do you work for BLP?


I think we all know the answer to that



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 11:05 AM
link   
a reply to: 3danimator2014

You got me. BrLP pays me to promote them on ATS, because ATS is such a lucrative potential market for them.

Looking at the notes, Jan 13, 2017 is a big day because that's the day the first geodesic Dense Receiver Array will be completed (gDRA). The gDRA is the photovoltaic dome that wraps around the black body light source. Once that's done, we should see a self-sustaining prototype generator produce power for the first time not too long after that. So perhaps a fully working prototype will be wheeled out for a public demo sometime near the end of January or in February.


edit on 11/2/2016 by AnarchoCapitalist because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 11:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
a reply to: 3danimator2014

You got me. BrLP pays me to promote them on ATS, because ATS is such a lucrative potential market for them.


To be fair, they have proven to be such bad businessmen, having a product that is 100% guaranteed to make them the richest guys in the world, but still unable to find buyers. I mean, people are willing to pay for Harry Potter books and some big video games in advance.

World changing energy source? Nope..just cant seem to reach those lofty heights of early sales. Haha

I hope you work for BLP because the alternative is a bit sad really. (Sad as in boohoo, not pathetic)



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 11:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: 3danimator2014
but still unable to find buyers.


You do realize that some of the most powerful people in the world are invested in BrLP, right?



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 02:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist

originally posted by: 3danimator2014
but still unable to find buyers.


You do realize that some of the most powerful people in the world are invested in BrLP, right?


Yes, and people that love (and can afford) incredible risk. The rewards are spectacular, but then you have to get delivery.
Who knows, perhaps they have inside information, but until the big wigs in science stamp it real, it does not matter how many other factions have interest in it.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 02:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: charlyv

originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist

originally posted by: 3danimator2014
but still unable to find buyers.


You do realize that some of the most powerful people in the world are invested in BrLP, right?


Yes, and people that love (and can afford) incredible risk. The rewards are spectacular, but then you have to get delivery.
Who knows, perhaps they have inside information, but until the big wigs in science stamp it real, it does not matter how many other factions have interest in it.


At this point, it doesn't matter what the big wigs in science have to say.

They are going to production with or without the blessing of the scientific elite.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 02:29 PM
link   
Then, statistically, it is most likely a scam. There is absolutely no reason to deny a peer review from those that hold the chairs, if you indeed had an invention that claims to be what it is. It would be a scientific breakthrough, and no serious inventor would ever pass it up.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 02:41 PM
link   
a reply to: charlyv

They did that already.

Dr. Kandalam Ramanujachary
Rowan University’s report
Dr. Ramanujachary speaks at 38:14
www.youtube.com...

Dr. Peter Mark Jansson
Rowan University’s report II
Dr. Peter Jansson speaks at 0:50
www.youtube.com...

Dr. Randy Booker
UNC Asheville’s report

Dr. Nick G Glumac
University of Illinois report
Dr. Nick Glumac speaks at time 1:13:00
www.youtube.com...

Dr. Joseph Renick, former Chief Scientist at Applied Research Associates
Applied Research Associates report
Dr. Joseph Renick speaks at time 47:20
www.youtube.com...



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 02:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
a reply to: charlyv

They did that already.

Dr. Kandalam Ramanujachary
Rowan University’s report
Dr. Ramanujachary speaks at 38:14
www.youtube.com...

Dr. Peter Mark Jansson
Rowan University’s report II
Dr. Peter Jansson speaks at 0:50
www.youtube.com...

Dr. Randy Booker
UNC Asheville’s report

Dr. Nick G Glumac
University of Illinois report
Dr. Nick Glumac speaks at time 1:13:00
www.youtube.com...

Dr. Joseph Renick, former Chief Scientist at Applied Research Associates
Applied Research Associates report
Dr. Joseph Renick speaks at time 47:20
www.youtube.com...


These are not the chairs of their respective sciences.
They are independent and university reviews, the first rungs in the ladder.
edit on 2-11-2016 by charlyv because: spelling , where caught



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 02:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: charlyv
Then, statistically, it is most likely a scam. There is absolutely no reason to deny a peer review from those that hold the chairs, if you indeed had an invention that claims to be what it is. It would be a scientific breakthrough, and no serious inventor would ever pass it up.


The entire scientific and academic community (establishment crowd) will continue passing it up until a working model is set up and working in a public venue where it can proven once and for all if it works or not. And they might even have to give away some working models to different universities to use and study to change the current paradigm, but I'll believe it all after all that happens.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 02:48 PM
link   
a reply to: charlyv

BrLP can't force scientists like Michio Kaku to conduct lab tests on their findings. Mills published his initial findings over a decade ago. Mills published a whole book on GUT-CP, and he has over a dozen papers published in scientific journals on his findings. All of it is available on BrLP's website. Any lab could take his research and replicate his findings.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 02:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: charlyv
Then, statistically, it is most likely a scam. There is absolutely no reason to deny a peer review from those that hold the chairs, if you indeed had an invention that claims to be what it is. It would be a scientific breakthrough, and no serious inventor would ever pass it up.


The entire scientific and academic community (establishment crowd) will continue passing it up until a working model is set up and working in a public venue where it can proven once and for all if it works or not. And they might even have to give away some working models to different universities to use and study to change the current paradigm, but I'll believe it all after all that happens.


Same for me. The scientific method (or the absence of it), will rule.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 02:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
a reply to: charlyv

BrLP can't force scientists like Michio Kaku to conduct lab tests on their findings. Mills published his initial findings over a decade ago. Mills published a whole book on GUT-CP, and he has over a dozen papers published in scientific journals on his findings. All of it is available on BrLP's website. Any lab could take his research and replicate his findings.



That is not the way they do it. The scouts are in the Universities. They are the source that, given the results of their testing and observations, make reports through the scientific community. If there is something really positive, it gets to the chairs, because that is one of their jobs. If it were real, in my opinion, they would be all over this.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 02:56 PM
link   
a reply to: charlyv

Apparently your opinion doesn't mean much.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 02:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
a reply to: charlyv

Apparently your opinion doesn't mean much.


To you, anyway.



posted on Nov, 2 2016 @ 03:03 PM
link   
a reply to: charlyv

My opinion doesn't matter. What matters are the production contracts, licensing agreements and lab results produced by BrLP. Given that the board of BrLP is composed of some of the most powerful people in finance, and that their investors include the former CEO of Pepsi and JP Morgan, I have to conclude that they wouldn't let Mills waste millions on a production ramp up if they didn't feel confident about the end results.

The only people whose opinion matter are the board of BrLP and their investors. Given that they are going into the production cycle, it looks like they must be satisfied.


edit on 11/2/2016 by AnarchoCapitalist because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
12
<< 13  14  15    17  18 >>

log in

join