It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Dallas shooting!

page: 83
189
<< 80  81  82    84  85  86 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 8 2016 @ 08:34 AM
link   
a reply to: MyHappyDogShiner

Kinda like the Orlando shooter narrative that he was a gay hater because he was gay?

Funny huh




posted on Jul, 8 2016 @ 08:35 AM
link   
So far I've heard that they got one in custody... one shot himself, which they were saying for hours while the event was still unfolding... and one was blown up with a robot bomb.

Now the narrative being pushed is that it might have been a lone gunman?

edit on 8-7-2016 by Konduit because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 8 2016 @ 08:36 AM
link   
Capital building on lockdown?! A woman with a backpack? Good grief!!



posted on Jul, 8 2016 @ 08:36 AM
link   
a reply to: onequestion

Exactly.

Seems like they will describe it any other way, then to call it for what it really is.

A terrorist act. I do not understand why can't I call this attack that, when it's what it is.



posted on Jul, 8 2016 @ 08:37 AM
link   
a reply to: MyHappyDogShiner

Now they're trying to twist it into some terrorist BS.

If it were terrorists they would have fired into the crowd for mass casualties and had people firing at the cops when they showed up too.

They're even trying to blame terrorists for spikes in crime in metro areas according to some reporter.



posted on Jul, 8 2016 @ 08:37 AM
link   
a reply to: texasgirl

People are going to be super jumpy after this



posted on Jul, 8 2016 @ 08:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Kali74




That's not what happened.



even if he got it second hand, it was very irresponsible not to call off the protest, and inform police. he cared more for his protest than he did the police or anyone that could have been killed.


He claimed to have talked with a fellow protester who spoke with the shooters beforehand. “We gonna kill somebody tonight,” the shooters allegedly told the protester. He described them as “young black guys,” and continued to note that “they’re not part of this community.”



posted on Jul, 8 2016 @ 08:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: everyone

And lots of people just say things after the fact, especially if they think it will bump up their status.
True but in this instance i do simply do not see how it would change much to the fact. Whether the supporters came from another town or this one.



posted on Jul, 8 2016 @ 08:40 AM
link   
a reply to: hounddoghowlie

Even if they were part of his group, of course he's not going to say it.

Imagine him saying oh yes, some guys from our group said they will be shooting some white guys, but we thought they are joking...



posted on Jul, 8 2016 @ 08:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: onequestion

Exactly.

Seems like they will describe it any other way, then to call it for what it really is.

A terrorist act. I do not understand why can't I call this attack that, when it's what it is.


That sadly is Obama's doing.



posted on Jul, 8 2016 @ 08:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: Kali74




That's not what happened.



even if he got it second hand, it was very irresponsible not to call off the protest, and inform police. he cared more for his protest than he did the police or anyone that could have been killed.


He claimed to have talked with a fellow protester who spoke with the shooters beforehand. “We gonna kill somebody tonight,” the shooters allegedly told the protester. He described them as “young black guys,” and continued to note that “they’re not part of this community.”




A very good point. I guess no life mattered all of a sudden.



posted on Jul, 8 2016 @ 08:42 AM
link   
So he (they?) wanted to kill whites and had hatred for BLM.


Also, blowing up a suspect...
I wonder what training session that came from!?!



posted on Jul, 8 2016 @ 08:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: MyHappyDogShiner
a reply to: MyHappyDogShiner

Now they're trying to twist it into some terrorist BS.

If it were terrorists they would have fired into the crowd for mass casualties and had people firing at the cops when they showed up too.

They're even trying to blame terrorists for spikes in crime in metro areas according to some reporter.


Errm, it was a terrorist act targeting police. Or are police not people now?



posted on Jul, 8 2016 @ 08:43 AM
link   
a reply to: MyHappyDogShiner

how was this not a terroristic act?



posted on Jul, 8 2016 @ 08:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: Domo1
a reply to: texasgirl

People are going to be super jumpy after this


You're right. A congressman reported seeing a staffer with a firearm. Apparently everyone overreacted.



posted on Jul, 8 2016 @ 08:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
I've never heard of blowing up suspects with bombs strapped to robots. Why not just shoot him with a bazooka if thats the case??!?!



No one had a bazooka.

I think it was an accident when the robot was removing the bomb.



eta; I was wrong. Got my ears crossed when they were talking about it. Sorry!
edit on 7 8 2016 by burgerbuddy because: made a mistake



posted on Jul, 8 2016 @ 08:45 AM
link   
a reply to: everyone

Aw hell, everything is a terrorist act then.

Even contempt of court...

K?.

Terrorist act = Average Joe being afraid to go to the store because he might get randomly targeted, not someone who chose to possibly, knowingly become a target, by their job choice. If you don't like being a target, don't be a cop or soldier.
edit on 8-7-2016 by MyHappyDogShiner because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 8 2016 @ 08:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Nikola014

It seems more like a hate crime.



posted on Jul, 8 2016 @ 08:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: Brett83

originally posted by: MyHappyDogShiner
a reply to: MyHappyDogShiner

Now they're trying to twist it into some terrorist BS.

If it were terrorists they would have fired into the crowd for mass casualties and had people firing at the cops when they showed up too.

They're even trying to blame terrorists for spikes in crime in metro areas according to some reporter.


Errm, it was a terrorist act targeting police. Or are police not people now?


I'd rather hear from our resident Cops if this was a terror attack than you.

There is a proper definition to the crime "Terrorism" than just "I think it should be".

Call it what you want, Brett, but you're not the decider of how this crime will be labelled by Authorities.



posted on Jul, 8 2016 @ 08:47 AM
link   
Question to Americans. Do you think this is a one off attack or do you expect more follow up attacks?



new topics

top topics



 
189
<< 80  81  82    84  85  86 >>

log in

join