It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

LIVE: FBI Director testifies before House Oversight Committee at 10am est. Live feed

page: 23
70
<< 20  21  22    24  25  26 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 01:33 PM
link   
"Was the Clinton Foundation tied to this investigation?"

"I'm not going to answer that."




posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 01:33 PM
link   
That sounds like a confirmation that there is an ongoing investigation of the Clinton Foundation!



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 01:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Stormdancer777
So, Hillary Clinton gave access of her classified emails to un-secure people?


YUP....Knowing full well that with Attorney-Client privilege, they couldn't testify against or incriminate her.


Not necessarily.



Such calls are normally sacrosanct under the principle of attorney-client privilege, the ability to speak confidentially with your lawyer. But a leak to The Guardian last summer of National Security Agency (NSA) procedures that are supposed to protect privileged calls showed that some attorney-client privileged calls are not subject to internal rules that detail the instances when a wiretap should be turned off. A later version of the procedures declassified by the NSA last August contains the same language.


www.thenation.com...

All the FBI had to do was claim 'national security'.


+2 more 
posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 01:33 PM
link   
His whole demeanor changed when the Clinton foundation came up... what he didnt say just became the most interesting thing I have seen today.



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 01:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: buni11687
"Was the Clinton Foundation tied to this investigation?"

"I'm not going to answer that."


That means YES...and the investigation is ongoing.



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 01:34 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT
50 years from now they will say how guilty she was



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 01:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Martin75

Was her intent to pass classified info on to her attorneys, or was her intent to have her attorneys go through and remove her personal emails? There's a difference.


Yes, assuming humans don't have eyes and brains.



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 01:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: buni11687
"Was the Clinton Foundation tied to this investigation?"

"I'm not going to answer that."


That means YES...and the investigation is ongoing.


Oh my word I missed that. That gives credence to the thread with the anonymous source saying the emails weren't anything and to focus on the Clinton Foundation!!

Wow!!!



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 01:36 PM
link   
a reply to: buni11687

That exchange matches your avvy.

Fingers crossed.



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 01:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

They weren't withheld. Wrong verb. They were deleted as personal.


wrong.

22 were withheld as top secret.

Remember the government news conference?




posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 01:36 PM
link   
Sorry fellas, but I wouldn't put much faith in this guy. Certainly not enough to actually investigate the clinton foundation.

Why didn't he answer those questions? Because that's the no no naughty place that you can't touch. He sidestepped those because those are the ones that will put him 6 feet under.
edit on 7-7-2016 by MisterSpock because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 01:36 PM
link   
Cummings politically trolling again.

Blah



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 01:36 PM
link   
GAH... every time that Jack hole speaks... I want to kick a kitten.. he was summoned to talk about the Clinton issue... not what rural jack booted thugs did ... hes the director of the FBI he is as far removed as you can get from a street cop.



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 01:37 PM
link   
Oh my goodness! Poor Comey has to endure Cummings' tirade about police shootings, and Comey has already said he has had to go to the bathroom for at least an hour and that was about 30 min. ago. He's probably about to pee his pants while he endures Cummings sermon.



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 01:37 PM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords
He needs to STFU and talk about the hearing that we are here for!



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 01:38 PM
link   
Oh, for crying out loud...Cummings saying he hopes his family is watching and seeing how proud they are of him, that he is the epitomy of a great public servant.

I'm gagging....



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 01:38 PM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords

Cummings is and always has been a baffoon. I come to know his position there on this panel is to fill a spot to just waste time and derail subjects.

mg



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 01:38 PM
link   
a reply to: GreatWay

He testified under oath. Are you accusing Director Comey of committing perjury in a congressional hearing?



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 01:38 PM
link   
I'm sorry, but this cummings guy is a joke.

I didn't want to play it in my original post, in this topic, but I find his complete lack of care about the INJUSTICE and UNEQUAL APPLICATION OF LAW in this case to be in direct conflict with what his race has endeared and fought for.

Now he has the BALLS to sit there and talk about the injustice brought upon the black community.

You, sir, are a hippocate. Go pound some sand.



posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 01:39 PM
link   
a reply to: JetBlackStare

All bullshet.




top topics



 
70
<< 20  21  22    24  25  26 >>

log in

join