posted on Jul, 7 2016 @ 01:24 PM
a reply to: MotherMayEye
That very intention to pursue purjurious statements was made very early on, almost at the beginning of comittee hearing.
Also, what I am hearing are questions that thier offices are probably getting flooded with namely (paraphrasing) "how is her actions not gross
neglect?"..and to explain over and over as to "what does intent vs. no inintent"
Chaffetz, is already planning and charged "investigate Hillary for lying under oath"
Many of the questions posed to Comey are specific enough, though scattered around the room, are aimed right at the heart of "lying to
Congress"....Purgury/General Purury/False Statements.....
Also, destruction of evidence etal. since Comey can show that many of the requested emails were destroyed after the requests.
The passing of classified information to 'non-cleared' persons and 'non-cleared' having access.
Comely handed Hilary to them by disclosing the details prior to announcing his recommendation.
Now he will be sent after her by Chaffetz using her words to congress and the facts the FBI recovered.
edit on 7-7-2016 by missed_gear because: spelling