LIVE: FBI Director testifies before House Oversight Committee at 10am est. Live feed

a reply to: AlaskanDad

Not what they said and as a matter of fact (C) doesn't mean classified it means confidential.

The meltdown is continuing.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: introvert

And there was a stenographer so they have notes just no recordings

Then if there was a stenographer, couldn't they get a transcript of this from the notes then? According to Comey, the answer is no. When he says no recordings, I think he meant none at all, including both audio or stenography recording. Something doesn't smell right.

When asked if there was a transcript of the interview, Comey stated that there wasn’t one because the interview wasn’t recorded,

www.breitbart.com...

originally posted by: introvert
The meltdown is continuing.

Wait until Philly later this month, if you think the Demmycrats are melting down now.

No 'Intent' proven with this sailor either...Yet:

Navy sailor pleads guilty to taking cellphone pictures inside restricted areas of nuclear submarine

A 29-year-old Navy sailor who took cellphone pictures of a nuclear submarine pleaded guilty on Friday to retaining classified information, according to the feds.

Petty Officer 1st Class Kristian Saucier could spend more than six years in prison under the suggested sentencing guidelines of his plea deal.

His prosecution led some to compare his case with that of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s State Department emails. Saucier entered his guilty plea to one criminal count of unauthorized possession and retention of national security information in U.S. District Court in Bridgeport, Conn.

He admitted he snapped pictures inside the restricted areas of the U.S.S. Alexandria while serving as its machinist’s mate at Naval Submarine Base New London in Groton.

FBI and Naval Criminal Investigative Service agents said he photographed the sub’s auxiliary steam plant panel and reactor compartment in January 2009, its propulsion operation system in March 2009 and part of its nuclear reactor in July 2009.

The feds have never alleged he shared or planned to share the pictures.

Yet, Department of Justice officials said in a statement Friday, “Saucier had a secret clearance and knew that the photos depicted classified material and that he was not authorized to take them. He retained these photos and failed to deliver them to any officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it.”

FBI and NCIS agents questioned him in July 2012 after the photos were discovered on his phone at a waste transfer station in Hampton, the feds said. When he returned home from the interview, he destroyed a laptop computer, his personal camera and the camera’s memory card, according to investigators.

“We vehemently deny that Mr. Saucier ever intentionally did anything to harm the U.S. or aid a foreign national,” Hogan told the Hartford Courant after Saucier’s indictment last July.“The government is trying to levy an espionage charge against him. The government is trying to make it a lot bigger than it is.”

www.nydailynews.com...

a reply to: UnBreakable

I hear them mention a 302??? Some type of record?

Did he just say his objective is to treat fairly anyone regardless of who they are?

People believe this $h!t outside the beltway?

Mulvaney is setting this up to show that anybody with relevant clearance can not be prosecuted even if they knowingly break the rules.

Good job.

originally posted by: introvert
The meltdown is continuing.

And just WHAT hearing have you been watching ?

Clinton has been made out to be a complete IDIOT.

originally posted by: neo96
So after a 3 hour 'talk'

THAT's when he decided Clintons 'fate' !!!!

What a absolute JOKE the FBI is.

Between the mixed drinks and Hors d'oeuvres there was not much discussion in the 3 hours of the interview.

What Amazes me is that Nobody follows up on the 'Intent' issue that FBI Director Comey feels is absent from the events...

just the fact that Hillary set up a private server in her basement (unsecured server) to conduct business in the State Department to communicate via emails.. is INTENT -> to circumvent the security protocols of her appointed office

the State Department had/has secure servers to communicate electronically on 3 different levels of information.


but She deliberately/intentionally chose to evade the government constrictions of Wi-Fi connectivity/emails on government provided servers and portals...and possibly personal devices provided to the Sec of State & her staff...
to have an electronic storehouse of on-going correspondences relating to daily activities
that would be 'private' to her but completely UnKnown to the Government Security Services...

the intent to evade govt rules and oversight and to circumvent even the Discovery of a private email server is an INDICTMENT of her 'Intent' to do things that were not very ethical or legal.. (including the disclosure that all 3 levels of documents/info was mixed in with everyday fluff in the emails)


possibly to have private records of activity there in the State Department, to refresh her memory when she writes her 'Memoirs' or for more of the activities she did before--

-Illegal use in accessing IRS files on opponents/ Lost Rose Law Firm records, & the sequence of other sleezey activities her & bill found 'Normal' as they stepped on the small people on their way to wealth & power


the Director of the FBI is covering-his-ash, with his recommendation... in a proper world Comey did the Pontius Pilate washing-of-hands routine...

what will wake these lawmakers up to impeach one guy and indict one gal

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: introvert
The meltdown is continuing.

And just WHAT hearing have you been watching ?

Clinton has been made out to be a complete IDIOT.

LOL...Let's hand over control of the Launch codes to her now.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UnBreakable

I hear them mention a 302??? Some type of record?

Ya, I did hear them mention a '302'. Maybe that's the FBI lingo for a transcript then.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Comey said the media coverage of that case didn't include all the facts. Just sayin'

Yes. He mentioned there is an extensive 302 of the interview. And that if he had it in front of him he would be able to answer more of the questions. He mentioned this 302 for several times.

a reply to: UnBreakable

302 is the immunity deal I think.

originally posted by: AlaskanDad

originally posted by: neo96
So after a 3 hour 'talk'

THAT's when he decided Clintons 'fate' !!!!

What a absolute JOKE the FBI is.

Between the mixed drinks and Hors d'oeuvres there was not much discussion in the 3 hours of the interview.

They saved some time by not putting her under oath.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: introvert
The meltdown is continuing.

And just WHAT hearing have you been watching ?

Clinton has been made out to be a complete IDIOT.

LOL...Let's hand over control of the Launch codes to her now.

I don't want her anywhere near buttons or classified materials EVER again.

2016 Vote like someones else life depends on it.

Because they do.

a reply to: introvert

time.com...

I do not see evidence that is sufficient to establish that Secretary Clinton or those with whom she was corresponding both talked about classified information on email and knew when they did it, they were doing something that was against the law,” Comey said.

“No reasonable prosecutor would bring this case.
No reasonable prosecutor would bring the second case in a hundred years focused on gross negligence.”

Did the FBI postpone her interview until last or did Clinton not agree to an interview until last Saturday? Is there any more info on that or a timeline of events?

It just seems to me it makes a difference.

In a typical investigation statements are typically gathered at the beginning. By waiting until the very end, Clinton can construct her comments based on what she knows they found. To avoid perjuring herself. She knows what she turned over. She can control how it looks - the intent - by waiting until the end to comment.

If she gives a statement first, then there is no chance to back peddle or explain away any inconvenient findings.