It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

FBI recommend no charges against Hillary!

page: 11
50
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 5 2016 @ 04:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: visitedbythem
The handwriting is on the wall, and now we can all read it for ourselves now.

Do you still wonder who all those hollow points are for, that the government has purchased? They are illegal to use in a war...... Outside the borders of a country, that is.


Law enforcement? Did they do anything especially unusual? Don't get me wrong, the fed is corrupt as can be at this point, but I just don't see marshall law/ a war against the citizens being planned. Maybe precautions are being taken against possible uprisings, but wouldn't any sane government do this? Basically, do you have any evidence I have to worry about a violent, large scale confrontation between the us fed and it's citizens/states?




posted on Jul, 5 2016 @ 04:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: kyleplatinum

Nah. I'd rather not waste my tax dollars on another silly witch hunt that won't go anywhere. I see your definition of "American" is wasting tax money on frivolous lawsuits that don't change the original verdicts.


Ok, I'll play your game.

"Your" measly tax dollars you contribute mean absolutely nothing in the big picture, so your point is invalid.



posted on Jul, 5 2016 @ 04:51 PM
link   
a reply to: DeathSlayer

Man, this .. sucks.


I just cannot stand her smugness, and her smugness is going to reach ridiculously high levels after this. That is for sure.

You know what continually amazes me? I am a European socialist (by American standards) and yet I would be inclined to vote Republican, had I had the right to vote in the U.S. - in an election where the Republican candidate is portrayed a deranged lunatic by even the most right leaning media outlets.

As much as I loved the sax playing Bill, I loathe the elitist Hillary. She just oozes contempt for .. for anyone and anything, really, that she considers being beneath her.

Like, say, the law.

Happy inDependence Day, guys..



posted on Jul, 5 2016 @ 04:55 PM
link   
Just a thought...

Is this about the fact of the matter that she was using insecure means to transmit classified correspondence? Or is it rather about a particular piece of communication? I’ll take a guess at the latter being the primary concern, in that something might have been discussed by email which could have been, or indeed was known to have been, intercepted.

Since the matter is of the highest secrecy then it’s obviously going to be open to speculation as to what that correspondence was actually all about. If the general public could not possibly know what it’s about then it’s foolish to jump to arbitrary conclusions.

What I’m getting at here is that Mrs Clinton could have been discussing something which was not being openly talked about and that somebody found out she was talking about it. Maybe, therefore, the FBI came to the conclusion that while she should have used more secure means to discuss it, she was not necessarily in the wrong for discussing it in the first place so long as she was ultimately concerning herself with the best interests of the state. What they’ve essentially said here is that her actions did not amount to treason.

She could have been naive, but since very few people will know what the big picture looks like then all we’ll really hear is conjecture from the public, the media and most certainly her political opponents. Will we ever know what this is really all about? Yes, we will... but on this evidence it won’t be the US Government putting the truth out.



posted on Jul, 5 2016 @ 04:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: EternalShadow

originally posted by: Lucidparadox
How does this somehow place the thought into peoples minds here that this would increase votes for Trump?

Hillary has been cleared!
No charges!

If anything this will make people more comfortable voting for her!

Im really excited they finally put this to rest.

I love this descision.

The fact it even got this far is outrageous, it was all due to the guns and religion crowd trying to find a way out of the hole they dug themselves into.

The resolution they came to made 100% sense. There was no intent. It was a careless mistake and thats all, and were talking about emails here folks.. some of you act like she was plotting a hidden american genocide from her private server.

Everyone makes carless mistakes, even presidents. Trump has made plenty. If anything, this just further humanizes her.

#imwithher


Here we go. My point proven.

Here's your typical sociopath supporter who will argue the "intent" card.



You act like the "intent" card wasnt just played by the Federal Bureau of Investigations.

Im a sociopath because I dont think someone should be imprisoned for a private e-mail server?

Is this real life?



posted on Jul, 5 2016 @ 05:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lucidparadox
Im a sociopath because I dont think someone should be imprisoned for a private e-mail server?

Is this real life?

I'm not saying you're a sociopath, I don't really care what you are but think about it.

People in America are imprisoned for far less on a daily basis and none of them are in charge of top secret documents.
Documents that if leaked/stolen could affect things on a very large scale.

This is real life!



posted on Jul, 5 2016 @ 05:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: HUMBLEONE
Yes! The vast right wing conspiracy is TROUNCED!! HILLARY 2016 BITCHES!! WHAHOO!!



How does officially being labeled careless and incompetent by the FBI help ones status?

Her fans are delusional.


More seriously, would anyone want to allow a careless and incompetent person carrying the briefcase with those launch codes?



posted on Jul, 5 2016 @ 06:06 PM
link   
All wrapped up in a neat and tidy package just in time for the democratic convention.

Clinton and the Potus were out campaigning together also.

That means planned way in advance.

Absolute collusion from the upper echelon of the US government.

The executive.

The DOJ.

The FBI.

Absolutely treasonous behavior by the lot of them.

Subverting the rule of LAW.

Subverting the functions of state agencies.

For no other reason that the parties preffered outcome.

A lying,corrupt, career politician.

Because that is what America 'needs' people.

THAT's what we need!



posted on Jul, 5 2016 @ 06:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: AMPTAH

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: HUMBLEONE
Yes! The vast right wing conspiracy is TROUNCED!! HILLARY 2016 BITCHES!! WHAHOO!!



How does officially being labeled careless and incompetent by the FBI help ones status?

Her fans are delusional.


More seriously, would anyone want to allow a careless and incompetent person carrying the briefcase with those launch codes?


More practically speaking and in terms of many of our daily lives....

If there was a potential new hire that you were considering to work for you and upon calling the applicant's references you were told that the candidate was "extremely careless"..... would you go ahead and hire that person?

Disclaimer: I understand that this is a presidential election so it's either one of less than desirable choices (which is different than reviewing people in a hiring pool).



posted on Jul, 5 2016 @ 06:11 PM
link   
One thing is for sure the meeting of Clinton and the AG was a setup.


The AG knew that if the FBI didn’t recommend an indictment then the only way Hillary was going to get indicted was through the Justice department.

Clinton obviously knew the FBI would recommend no indictment.

So he knew then that the only way Hillary could get indicted was through the Justice department

So what does he do?

Meets with the AG and creates that scandal


Then the AG says she will only follow the recommendation of the FBI since she is tainted by the meeting

She obviously knew the FBI was going to recommend no indictment.

So now Hillary can NEVER be indicted

The meeting was a setup to get Hillary off



posted on Jul, 5 2016 @ 06:13 PM
link   
Thats hillarious. Some of you have not the slightest clue how the white house is run.

There are so many safeguards in place when yku arw the president its almost impossible to screw up like that.

The secret service controls every aspect of your life. You have an advisor for everything, and they have advisors.

You are essentially a glorified judge. Your advisors argue with eachother and give you different options on courses of action to take and you pick one. Its like a 4 year multiple choice test.

The fact that she used her personal email instead of her work one wouldnt even come about as president since everything she owns would be hyper encrypted and run by the DoD and the Secret Service.



posted on Jul, 5 2016 @ 06:19 PM
link   
What does this imply and what are the implications?
To me it seems that the rule of law means nothing
How can the "elite" benefit from this?
Limbo



posted on Jul, 5 2016 @ 06:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: eluryh22

originally posted by: AMPTAH

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: HUMBLEONE
Yes! The vast right wing conspiracy is TROUNCED!! HILLARY 2016 BITCHES!! WHAHOO!!



How does officially being labeled careless and incompetent by the FBI help ones status?

Her fans are delusional.


More seriously, would anyone want to allow a careless and incompetent person carrying the briefcase with those launch codes?


More practically speaking and in terms of many of our daily lives....

If there was a potential new hire that you were considering to work for you and upon calling the applicant's references you were told that the candidate was "extremely careless"..... would you go ahead and hire that person?

Disclaimer: I understand that this is a presidential election so it's either one of less than desirable choices (which is different than reviewing people in a hiring pool).


Actually, I have been looking at it as who would I trust to take care of my children or grandchildren.

Trump obviously tells me that he will not actually need to know how to take of them since he will hire the best caretakers that he deems are the experts...I am not allowed to know who they are...just give him my praise unless they mess up and then he will say it was their fault!

Hillary tells me that she understands and has experience, she is a woman and mother too! Her actions show that she lies, is extremely careless, and will never accept responsibility!

Third party candidate Johnson, tells me he will not smoke marijuana while he in charge of taking care of my kids. He could have lied like many and said he stopped using it medicinally, but no, he was honest that he did use it recreationally.

Third party candidate Stein, spends her whole focus on telling me how she would protect my child from harm. She will never let things get unsafe by restricting any chance of my child being harmed. Restrictions, restraints, and punishments. My child will not have any freedom, but will be safe.

Who do you hire? In reality...I am watching my own grandchildren for my children. I don't seem to have that option in this election. I am biased toward honesty and will give someone a chance as long as they have shown they are trustworthy and have a record of fair decision making. So far...that leaves me in the third party camp edging towards Johnson.

How about you?



posted on Jul, 5 2016 @ 06:28 PM
link   
I would like to know if there is a connection between the Clinton Foundation and this mail server being on he same box or network. At least that is what I thought was the case. Maybe that is meaningful.



posted on Jul, 5 2016 @ 06:29 PM
link   
Why would everybody want Hillary to walk on these charges?

It doesn't make sense.

Comey proved today that there are many many things with which she could be charged and/or fined for, yet he doesn't recommend charges.

Lynch probably won't prosecute because she said she would follow the recommendations by the FBI after the inappropriate and terrible optics of her and Bill's tete-te-tete behind the closed doors of her private plane.

Obama stands side by side with her today and praised her in such a sweetly sickening way, it made me want to puke.

Something is seriously wrong in our country. What is driving this obvious acceptance of government lawlessness?

Why do democrats turn a blind eye to this in-your-face corruption?



posted on Jul, 5 2016 @ 06:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: BlueAjah
Comey even specifically said that intent is not required to bring federal charges.

The FBI can not be trusted. Their masters have our justice system under their total control.

Comey looked angry. I think he was leaned on hard.

Intent doesn't matter if you break the law. Comey was probably threatened very severely to play ball.
edit on 5-7-2016 by 191stMIDET because: Typo



posted on Jul, 5 2016 @ 06:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lucidparadox
Thats hillarious. Some of you have not the slightest clue how the white house is run.

There are so many safeguards in place when yku arw the president its almost impossible to screw up like that.

The secret service controls every aspect of your life. You have an advisor for everything, and they have advisors.

You are essentially a glorified judge. Your advisors argue with eachother and give you different options on courses of action to take and you pick one. Its like a 4 year multiple choice test.

The fact that she used her personal email instead of her work one wouldnt even come about as president since everything she owns would be hyper encrypted and run by the DoD and the Secret Service.



So in all of those classified emails they recovered you don't think that Obama knowing ingle responded to her unsecured server? Why else is this indictment dead in the water? Clinton has shown that she does not care about protocols and is above such surveillance. She will do as she pleases and all be d*mned to even judge her!!! Is this really what you want in your elective Queen...oops I mean President?



posted on Jul, 5 2016 @ 06:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: kyleplatinum

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: BO XIAN

The verdict is in, and I'm content with letting it go. It's a shame you and your right leaning cohorts probably won't be letting it go for the foreseeable future and I expect many tax dollars to be wasted on future investigations that will turn up nothing.


You being "content with letting it go" makes you a supporter, which makes you part of the problem.

Corruption should NEVER be let go.
Justice should NEVER be let go.
Liberty should NEVER be let go.

Scary how un-American you are.

Star for you!!! Sic Semper Tyrannis.



posted on Jul, 5 2016 @ 06:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: roadgravel
I would like to know if there is a connection between the Clinton Foundation and this mail server being on he same box or network. At least that is what I thought was the case. Maybe that is meaningful.


That is extremely meaningful.



posted on Jul, 5 2016 @ 06:37 PM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords

Well, it's either because both parties are simply two sides of the same coin OR the GOP doesn't want to preside over the coming #storm.



new topics

top topics



 
50
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join