It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: ChesterJohn
I'm not going to go round in circles debating the son of god vs Jesus is god.
I'm also not going to go around in circles debating if there is a god or not.
Both of those are futile for us to debate with each other. Neither of us are going to accomplish anything.
Then why are you even participating in this thread?
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: ChesterJohn
I'm not going to go round in circles debating the son of god vs Jesus is god.
I'm also not going to go around in circles debating if there is a god or not.
Both of those are futile for us to debate with each other. Neither of us are going to accomplish anything.
Then why are you even participating in this thread?
Because those aren't the subject of the thread.
But you're right. These threads always devolve into arguing semantics about the existence of God and the interpretations of the many versions of the bible.
Enjoy your time with this thread. I'm out.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: NOTurTypical
Actually, I'm fine with the pagan "Christ". I'm just not fine with attributing Jesus the Nazarene to "Christ", unless of course, we are all "Christs".
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: NOTurTypical
Actually, I'm fine with the pagan "Christ". I'm just not fine with attributing Jesus the Nazarene to "Christ", unless of course, we are all "Christs".
Christ means anointed. If that gives you issues then like I said, call Him HaMashiyach.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: NOTurTypical
Actually, I'm fine with the pagan "Christ". I'm just not fine with attributing Jesus the Nazarene to "Christ", unless of course, we are all "Christs".
Christ means anointed. If that gives you issues then like I said, call Him HaMashiyach.
how about just using the regular jesus of nazareth?
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: NOTurTypical
Actually, I'm fine with the pagan "Christ". I'm just not fine with attributing Jesus the Nazarene to "Christ", unless of course, we are all "Christs".
Christ means anointed. If that gives you issues then like I said, call Him HaMashiyach.
how about just using the regular jesus of nazareth?
Seeing as that is what people called Him that didn't realize He was the Messiah, I guess that's appropriate for Windword.
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
a reply to: TzarChasm
No, I don't.
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
a reply to: TzarChasm
That presupposes that it's impossible for the Immortal, infinite, omniscient God to reveal Himself to man. This also presupposes that if all don't have ears to hear and eyes to see then no one else does.
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
a reply to: TzarChasm
Faith just means you believe God will do what He said HE will do. Trust basically.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
a reply to: TzarChasm
Faith just means you believe God will do what He said HE will do. Trust basically.
again, priests will always take the parachute over the rosary beads if they are about to fall out of the sky. gravity doesnt give a rats furry rectum about your salvation package.
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
a reply to: TzarChasm
Faith just means you believe God will do what He said HE will do. Trust basically.
again, priests will always take the parachute over the rosary beads if they are about to fall out of the sky. gravity doesnt give a rats furry rectum about your salvation package.
You're talking about a ton of stuff I never affirmed as my position. If some Joker wants to be a fool and jump out of a plane and try to make God save his life, sorry it's not going to happen.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: ChesterJohn
I'm not going to go round in circles debating the son of god vs Jesus is god.
I'm also not going to go around in circles debating if there is a god or not.
Both of those are futile for us to debate with each other. Neither of us are going to accomplish anything.
Then why are you even participating in this thread?
Because those aren't the subject of the thread.
But you're right. These threads always devolve into arguing semantics about the existence of God and the interpretations of the many versions of the bible.
Enjoy your time with this thread. I'm out.
it is true, the topic is in concern to the compatibility of reason and faith. to squeeze this debate into the frame of judaism is very restrictive and misleading as it implies judaism is the only source of faith or the most prestigious source of faith. lets compare reason to norse or greek or roman or aztec or hindu or celtic or sumerian faith. anyone wanna take a crack?
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: NOTurTypical
Actually, I'm fine with the pagan "Christ". I'm just not fine with attributing Jesus the Nazarene to "Christ", unless of course, we are all "Christs".
Christ means anointed. If that gives you issues then like I said, call Him HaMashiyach.
how about just using the regular jesus of nazareth?
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
a reply to: TzarChasm
I think you're confusing Almighty God with the genie from Aladdin. And it's not witchcraft either, "I did an incantation and put Jesus' name at the end so you are forced to obey me."
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then He is not omnipotent. Is He able, but not willing? Then He is malevolent. Is He both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is He neither able nor willing? Then why call Him God?