It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

SCI/TECH: Study: Colorectal Screening Test Fails

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 17 2005 @ 08:24 PM
link   
Researchers have found that the digital fecal occult blood test failed to identify ninety-five percent of growths which have the potential to become malignant. The take home tests were shown to be far more effective even though they missed some seventy-five percent of such growths. Some experts say that these tests should not be abandoned, but they should not be relied upon solely.
 



www.comcast.net
A common screening test failed to detect potentially cancerous colon growths 95 percent of the time, falsely reassuring patients and doctors, according to a new study.

Researchers found that the digital, in-office test on stool samples was not as reliable as a six-sample test given to patients to do on their own at home _ although even that test detected potentially cancerous growths less than 24 percent of the time.

"What we found is that it was pretty worthless," Dr. David Lieberman, one of the study's authors, said of the in-office test. "It's a wake-up call that we shouldn't be relying on this test."

The study, published Tuesday in the Annals of Internal Medicine, was conducted at 13 Veterans Affairs medical centers and involved 2,665 patients _ most of them men _ who were given the at-home test and the in-office test followed by a colonoscopy.




Please visit the link provided for the complete story.


This is not a subject most are fond of discussing, especially the digital component, but early detection plays a very important role in cancer survival. It would be a good idea for individuals to discuss the findings of this study with their physicians when having their annual physical. I had been led to believe that these two tests, when used in combination were reliable, but this does not seem to be the case.

Related News Links:
www.waff.com
abcnews.go.com
professional.cancerconsultants.com

[edit on 05/1/17 by GradyPhilpott]




posted on Jan, 17 2005 @ 08:54 PM
link   
indeed,

my VA Clinic Primary Physician
recommended that i go to 'on the economy' Doctor for
at worst the colonoscopy or at best a CAT scan or whatever(experimental)

the unspoken intention being..?...
i would get quicker and reliable lab work from outside/civilian sources.


even the VAs quarterly magazine didn't publish this story...
i guess i'm zagging, whilst they are zigging

thanks



posted on Jan, 17 2005 @ 09:09 PM
link   
Now, why does this NOT surprise me?

FWIW, since the subject has been brought up, here is some info on colonscopy and virtual colonscopy:
digestive.niddk.nih.gov...
www.virtualphysical.com...
www.medicinenet.com...



new topics
 
0

log in

join