It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

"Pre-Packaged" BBC News Report of War Breaking-out Between Russia ...truncated

page: 2
17
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 09:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: BO XIAN

True.

There's plenty to be more than a little curious about.

And, I understand that the New York Times has a massive headline ready announcing THE RAPTURE and 2ND COMING OF CHRIST.


This isn't the 1950's, there's no need to have headlines at the ready lol

Zero critical thought.




posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 10:02 PM
link   
Seemed a little patchy to me.

Not sure why people still obsess over the WW3 scenario anymore. You aren't going to be able to prep for thousands of warheads raining down.

Not a thing you can do. If it happens it happens.
edit on 2-7-2016 by In4ormant because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 10:34 PM
link   
a reply to: notmyrealname

I thought it was a pretty well done piece. There was only one error that I noticed. They had a UN meeting sounding like it was in D.C.

It had sufficient realistic flair to it. I hope it woke some people up. If so, it served a good purpose.



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 10:35 PM
link   
a reply to: notmyrealname

Given the current tensions between NATO and Russia, I don't think it's far fetched at all. It's inevitable.



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 10:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

Welllllll, oh caustic one . . .

The last time I read about that was probably in the 1960's.

However, you are welcome for me providing you with another opportunity to stab and slice.



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 10:41 PM
link   
a reply to: notmyrealname

The last 6-12 months, the oligarchy has been signaling via the MSM that WW3 looms . . . just along these lines.

The Putin and Imposter in Chief's brick bats toward one another . . . the adventures in the Nato countries near Russia . . . the Black Sea stuff . . . etc. etc. etc.

At some point . . . they WILL light it off. The warnings are not just farts in a hurricane.

And the scenario in the video is as plausible as a number of others at this time.



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 11:28 PM
link   
a reply to: BO XIAN
At the same time NATO forces are surrounding Russia in violation of their own promises not to do so, Western influences causing coups in Ukraine and missile systems being placed in nations surrounding Russia....

= Russian Aggression....



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 11:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: notmyrealname
a reply to: BO XIAN
At the same time NATO forces are surrounding Russia in violation of their own promises not to do so, Western influences causing coups in Ukraine and missile systems being placed in nations surrounding Russia....

= Russian Aggression....


Are you talking about polands system you know thr one that has zero chance of stopine an ICBM unless it caught it in the launch faze?? Do you mean the one that is zero threat to Russia unless they fired cruise missiles at Poland and even then only if they attacked warsaw. By thr way Russians actually have an ICBM shield but a parent ly have a problem with their neighbors having one.

Never understood that it's like telling your neighbor I have a gun and you get mad because he buys a bulletproof vest. Yet somehow this bullet proof vest is a threat to you even though you can just shoot him in the head. Since when is defending yourself considered a threat??



posted on Jul, 2 2016 @ 11:59 PM
link   
a reply to: notmyrealname

AGREED

Almost like our setting up Pearl Harbor . . . sadly.



posted on Jul, 3 2016 @ 12:01 AM
link   
a reply to: dragonridr

Also plenty true.

There is still, imho, a LOT of deliberate

playing with matches and sparklers in a dynamite factory aspect to the geopolitical dances and games the oligarchy is playing in that region.



posted on Jul, 3 2016 @ 12:04 AM
link   
Yeah clearly a amateur creation. Russia's Black Sea fleet in the Med would be slaughtered they would never leave them sitting out that vulnerable much less be sending a couple of destroyers in the Adriatic. Only 75 thousand troops to invade the Baltic states would not cut he mustered. And this is all happening in a day? Russia is also tossing around tactical nukes but, massing forces to invade Poland? if you have started a tactical nuclear exchange you not going to want your troop massed anywhere. And what are these random NATO supply convoys just sailing around in the first day of the war? Why has article 5 not been invoked? Being so heavily out numbered by NATO Russia would have have its reserved mobilized and that would take months, not to mention Everybody would notice. And the idea that attacking NATO ships in the Med would some how be a distraction for an invasion of the Baltic states and Poland? It would put NATO forces on alert which is not where you want them to be. And if you have already attacked NATO your forces massing anywhere are going to hit from a much much larger NATO air force. I could go on but, I suppose it is made more as something fun than as something realistic.



posted on Jul, 3 2016 @ 12:16 AM
link   
a reply to: dragonridr
Yeah, so NATO has been fine with Russia all the time and accepted a mutually agreed upon 'buffer zone' until some brainiac gets the idea that they need a new superpower enemy and incites a coup in Ukraine, Russia responds much in the way that the US would respond to a crisis on their border and now Eastern European NATO members get new "defensive" weapon system while NATO amasses offensive forces all around Russia while citing "Russian Aggression".

While you are chewing on that, let's look at NATO members "Aggression" on the sovereign nations....

Notice the glaring difference in how many countries NATO members have decimated lately?



posted on Jul, 3 2016 @ 12:43 AM
link   
Haven't watched, the font used in screenshots isn't the same font used by BBC so obviously fake.



posted on Jul, 3 2016 @ 01:03 AM
link   
a reply to: MrSpad

Thanks for your knowledgeable points.

Paragraphs would have made them much easier to read.



posted on Jul, 3 2016 @ 01:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: notmyrealname
What say yee ATS; is this an elaborate farce and if so,


Let us see what other crap that site has....

Oh dear, we see

In this public EPA document, the agency says it was ordered by President Obama's Executive Order 12656


Slight problem, Executive Order 12656 was signed in 1988 By President Reagan....
www.archives.gov...

So anything they claim is probably crap.



posted on Jul, 3 2016 @ 01:27 AM
link   
a reply to: hellobruce

I thought that everything you disagreed with was automatically crap . . .

by your omniscient definition.



posted on Jul, 3 2016 @ 02:25 AM
link   
a reply to: notmyrealname

That was some rather enjoyable doom porn.

Thanks for sharing it.


s&f



posted on Jul, 3 2016 @ 03:10 AM
link   
нато

To the Ubermorons/Psyops at Nato that made this garbage Video:

What do you want a nucleair war we are already at Defcon 2 ?
Please don't kill our daughters and sons :




Russians love their children too !


edit on 732016 by frenchfries because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 3 2016 @ 03:16 AM
link   
a reply to: frenchfries

We aren't at defcon 3.



posted on Jul, 3 2016 @ 08:15 AM
link   
a reply to: notmyrealname

You don't need to watch all 36 minutes of a fake video to know it's fake



new topics

top topics



 
17
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join