a reply to: terminator292
Oh I don't know if I'd call it a fact outside of local phenomenology, I'm just an observer someone else may observe something else in their
phenomenological relativity. If it arises and is perceived, then it can also pass and not be perceived... so the only thing left obvious is simply
awareness. As such this arises due to that, this doesn't arise due to this. That's all science seems to be based off of yet it is still hampered by
calling statistically likely variables as fact... but they work well enough in a given situation, but one unaccounted for variable away from a
totality of that entire system from being a failure.
All of these boxes we try to enclose things in work in the relative environments we try to box them in. Christianity does work without a belief in
Christ, Buddhism works if ones doesn't treat Buddha as anyone but someone that gave you directions, yet both said walk it; this thing called life...
not stand there ruminating with cud in ones mouths until we evolve the stomach for it. But no matter what things arise things pass thats the nature of
everything in phenomenal existence... taking any variable in such a system as an absolute instead of something that arose due to all of the conditions
in that point in time converging for it to arise leaves so very many things unaccounted for in phenomenology.
Yet no need to get complex, sight arises due to having eyes, all senses are the same... none of the perceptions phenomenological that arise in these
senses, need to be carried further beyond their arising. We know some experience causes us pain and some of it suffering, yet adaptation to those
adversities is what drives or hinders that very evolving itself.
Life is tenacious we can see how desperate it is to cling to form, by animals abandoning their own children for something better for oneself in a
total disregard of that life itself being more precious in the equality and respect for it's being. Of course we can evolve ourselves into an extreme
of bias out of the loop, like the Panda only eating Bamboo it has gotten to the point of not even liking any ol bamboo so specialists in order to keep
the Panda around have been importing and playing with bamboo, know who else is next in the way of Panda? The Koala, due to the eucalyptus being it's
When such species takes to such an extreme of bias to one side or the other, it is always detrimental to the entire affected species... whether one
wants to call it good from one extreme or bad from the other extreme... balance out all the good and bads from a room full of people via questionnaire
in a game of elimination and no one will be left in the room due to bias... no matter how closely as a group they may have identified with before it
even started, that is making sure honesty is left as a control, as some simply due to affinity are known to change their individual answers for
conformity and cohesion, and in such a manner is how groups and society forms...
yet since we are all in contact and aware of each other, it's best to speak of humanity as a blanket when moving forward, yet when we go to the
extremes of bias at either end we will still be left with an empty room, this is why celebrating differences, tolerating others, and embracing the
creativity and beauty of it is the only thing that will keep us moving forward despite the constant inequality that keeps us from equilibrium, it is
also what keeps us moving forward in growth and adapting to adversity making us stronger as a species, yet in the attempt to dominate and control
everything we see as an adversity, we have become a detriment to ourselves and our very existence.
Zikka arising by trying to wipe out the entire mosquito population, through genetic modification... remember how tenacious life is? Genocide always
leaves survivors to grow and adapt, life itself sees to it... when something like the panda creates it's own evolutionary dead end the form of it's
existence bows it's head into being left as a distant memory. Yet life the energy harnessing all matter known and unknown still goes on, regardless to
any concepts or subjectivity we try to bind it too as chains and make it a subject to enslave to our ideas or concepts of knowledge, it just continues
and flows on regardless of any bias to form and that's just nature itself, being it is what it is as it is arising and passing in the moment it is ad
infinitum never the same moment as the previous, holding onto that that has passed optional and not required for it nor anything to exist as it is
from one moment to the next... choice changes a variable in the equation but never the flow that can not be harnessed in any permanence just
phenomenology experienced in it's arising moment to moment to moment.
My apologies for refuting "fact" if it's true to you it's true to your local relativity of being and that's where "fact" always ends in the hands or
mind in which it is held.