It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Triton1128
a reply to: Atsbhct
Its not your place to decide the direction of the thread. My recent rant posts touches on this. IF you have nothing to contribute to a thread other then side tracking the discussion, or trolling members posts, then you sir are the issue.
** Thank you OP for posting this.
Atsbhct is right that this "UFO Wikileak" is not a leak at all, but public information. The information may be good information, and it may (or may not) be meaningful to UFOlogy -- HOWEVER, this being public information and not "leaked" information, there is no reason that this guy would be charged with anything. I mean, he has this information because the government legally gave it to him.
originally posted by: Rosinitiate
originally posted by: Jonjonj
a reply to: Rosinitiate
Well I wholeheartedly disagree, so now what?
I suppose we agree to disagree.
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: randyvs
Or charge him on drugs, child abuse, animal neglect, or anything else that would make him untouchable. Not on UFO stuff.
originally posted by: Triton1128
a reply to: Atsbhct
Its not your place to decide the direction of the thread. My recent rant posts touches on this. IF you have nothing to contribute to a thread other then side tracking the discussion, or trolling members posts, then you sir are the issue.
** Thank you OP for posting this.
IF you have nothing to contribute to a thread other then side tracking the discussion,