It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Gryphon66
Intentionally trying to suggest its not the foundation is a problem in that you do not understand criminal investigations.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Gryphon66
The Clinton Foundation is under and FBI criminal investigation.
Reread and understand.
ETA - Like I said ignorance is a choice. Using the Breitbart excuse when other outlets are carrying the same information says a lot about your willful ignorance.
originally posted by: kosmicjack
To the eye-rollers in this thread...I worked for a State DOJ as an investigator. Civil, not criminal. If I had a dollar for every time I got a phone call from a state, local or federal politician, feeling me out as to how they could influence my investigation - I'd be RICH! Hell, I got the same from citizens. It's a very subtle thing that just hangs in the air waiting to be grabbed by an opportunist. And, when confronted as to their intentions, they always played it off as if I misunderstood.
It's the very reason we recorded all conversations and, on occasion, our criminal division wore wires.
So, to even suggest that this was "nothing" is just laughable to me. Especially as there was no photos or phones allowed.
Imagine if Rudy Giuliani, in his hey-dey, had a pop-in chat from John Gotti that he didn't disclose but was busted by media. Don't think for one minute the FBI wouldn't look twice at that.
originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: Gryphon66
They could have stood outside. How do you know a faction within the FBI didn't tip off the media?
Worked for Bernie but not his campaign even though you said you didnt work for either candidate.