Japan's top court has approved blanket surveillance of the country's Muslims

originally posted by: MysticPearl
a reply to: harvestdog

I'd move to Japan but they're tough on immigration too. Damn Japanese, protecting their citizens and all that.

The nerve of those people.

You like Japan…fine.

Understand then don’t be caught with a gun over there

a reply to: MysticPearl

Is all about political correctness, and the old show me the money so I can let the BS do the talking.

Look at Japan, they have no problems controlling radical Islam within their borders without political correctness, been tag racist, bigots and prejudice, they just go straight to the root of the problem and make sure that the roots doesn't get too deep before is too late.

The rest of the western countries including US are bending backwards when it comes to Islamic fundamentalism while kissing the butts of terrorism.

Because they don't want to add two and two, Islam and Muslim, Islamic fundamentalist and terrorism.

They want people to seen and hear no evil.

a reply to: Liquesence

Another liberal logic fail.

Fear isn't killing people. Sharia following extremists who blow people up, chop off heads, stone women, burn girls, drop people in acid, throw people off roofs, unload stockpiles of ammunition on non-believers, that's what is killing people.

Humanity isn't as dumb as you make it out to be. People didn't just wake up and decide to be scared of Islamic extremists, just as people didn't wake up and decide to be scared of butterflies. One blows people up and mass slaughters them, the other flies around nature minding its own business.

a reply to: marg6043

It's because Japanese culture thinks far less on emotion and far more on common sense.

a reply to: MysticPearl

Another failure at reading comprehension by someone who has already decided what they're going to say without listening to what was previously said because they want to bash liberals and Muslims.

Got it.

Fricken racist.

a reply to: MysticPearl

They have given a finger to political correctness and their citizens have not become dumb to it, like most western countries, thanks to the fallacy of globalization and unfiltered diversity.

originally posted by: MysticPearl

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

I don't believe that pointing out to Islamic terrorist groups and cells embedded in countries around the world is offending and discriminating, the problem is that the Islamic terrorist happen to be Muslims also.

The irony.

I'm curious as to where the hell liberals think the extremism comes from. Apparently they don't think it's the mosques, the Muslim neighborhoods or the Sharia belief system from within.

So where is it exactly they think it comes from? I have yet to hear a single liberal connect extremism to Islam. That includes Obama and Hillary. Do they think these guys simple wake up one morning, make a bowl of oatmeal and decided over breakfast, hey, I'm going to be a terrorist and kill infidels?

One of the thing that bugs me the most is the following:

"You can't blame muslim immigration because almost all terrorists are home grown"

Ok so let's put some safeguards in place, to deter these home grown radical muslims...

"No, you can't profile somebody because of their religion"

Ok so what do you suggest we do?

"...ummm, nothing? I mean I can't tell you what to do, I can only tel you what you can't do. You figure it out"

That kind of argument gets on my tits.

People need to stop being politically correct fools.
So what if a few peoples feelings are hurt.. profiling is how you catch criminals and keep people safe.

Maybe Muslims should do more to eradicate this very real Muslim threat instead of complaining about profiling?

All countries should adopt similar methods

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Swills

Giving up safety for liberty is fine as long as it is muslims, duh.

Not to nitpick but I think you meant "liberty for safety", right?

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: MysticPearl

Another failure at reading comprehension by someone who has already decided what they're going to say without listening to what was previously said because they want to bash liberals and Muslims.

Got it.

Nope.

This is the new liberal agenda. Any acknowledgement of a problem or intent to confront a problem is labelled as "bashing".

An inability to focus on issues because you're afraid of offending, hence you turned it into "bashing".

a reply to: harvestdog

Really wish America would do this. Well, at least in the open. Maybe then people in our country would understand. I think the best thing for America to do now is just fess up to the transnational spying and explain motives. The world isn't falling apart since Japan announced this new plan. What do you think?

a reply to: Jonjonj

The only solution they present is "more of the same" and "don't offend".

And all that's doing is causing more death and destruction.

There is no solution provided. The conversation immediately turns to "how dare you say that". Ahem.

a reply to: MysticPearl

No, you purposefully threw out "liberal" several times, and began using that as a point of argument, because your arguments have relied on criticism of "liberals," the "liberal 'agenda,'" and "Muslims."

What you haven't done is address my initial premise, that one goal of the extremists is a fundamental change in the way of life of the countries they terrorize, which is being helped by things YOU support.

Do you advocate the change of American way of life and founding principle because of terrorists? Do you support profiling? Internment camps? Maybe have them all check in to DHS and turn over their phone and email records every month?

originally posted by: MysticPearl
a reply to: Jonjonj

The only solution they present is "more of the same" and "don't offend".

Who is them?

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: MysticPearl

No, you purposefully threw out "liberal" several times, and began using that as a point of argument, because your arguments have relied on criticism of "liberals," the "liberal 'agenda,'" and "Muslims."

Of course I did. Because it's true.

And all you're doing is hijacking this thread. You can either agree with Japan or suggest a solution and what they otherwise should have done. You've offered neither.

All you've offered is getting offended. And it's yet another example of a liberal avoiding the topic at hand and turning the issue into crying about being offended.

a reply to: MysticPearl

It's your lucky day because I am about to make your dreams come true.

RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM!!!! RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM!!!! RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM!!!! RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM!!!! RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM!!!! RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM!!!! RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM!!!! RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM!!!! RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM!!!! RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM!!!!

There. Now you can say that you saw a progressive say that phrase TEN times!

I love it when I can do good deeds!

Now onto the nuance....

Radical Islamic Terrorism derives from a subset of the Sunni branch of Islam called Salafism or Wahabbism - the major exporter of which happens to be our good, good friends and allies, Saudi Arabia.

originally posted by: MysticPearl

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: MysticPearl

No, you purposefully threw out "liberal" several times, and began using that as a point of argument, because your arguments have relied on criticism of "liberals," the "liberal 'agenda,'" and "Muslims."

Of course I did. Because it's true.

And all you're doing is hijacking this thread. You can either agree with Japan or suggest a solution and what they otherwise should have done. You've offered neither.

All you've offered is getting offended. And it's yet another example of a liberal avoiding the topic at hand and turning the issue into crying about being offended.

Do you have a solution other than criticizing liberals?

Japan is not the US. They have different laws and they are a different culture. What they do does not fit in with our country, laws, or society or what we should do. If we were to do it it would be against our founding principles. And since it fundamentally changes our society, that helps them win, which you support, as I said from my very first post.

Pay attention.

ETA:
You never answered these questions, which is not surprising considering people who avoid the issue:

Do you advocate the change of American way of life and founding principle because of terrorists? Do you support profiling? Internment camps? Maybe have them all check in to DHS and turn over their phone and email records every month?

a reply to: Hefficide

My dream is a solution, buddy.

And the Saudi's being "our friends" isn't some positive in all this. It's a disgrace.

originally posted by: bobs_uruncle

originally posted by: MystikMushroom
According to Wikipedia, Japan has only 100,000 Muslims.

Yes, they are very careful with immigration standards and refuse to destroy their culture. I can get behind that. What I wonder about though is how hentai and tentacle porn fit into that culture?

Cheers - Dave

Manga and hentai and porn are OUTLETS for alot of japanese people. Its one of the reasons the crime rate is so low.