It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Endless bigotry

page: 2
13
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 30 2016 @ 12:11 PM
link   
a reply to: BuzzyWigs






posted on Jun, 30 2016 @ 12:11 PM
link   
a reply to: BuzzyWigs

Nah it should be



with this in the background.





I mean come on OP seeing people smile leads your thoughts to gays? lol funny.
edit on 30-6-2016 by TheKnightofDoom because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 30 2016 @ 12:15 PM
link   
a reply to: TheKnightofDoom

That's a nice image too - but while I sound flippant, the technique I gave him above actually could help him....

LOL!!

@ reldra:



@OP:
Maybe should have rethought your username - but it's too late now....live up to it!



posted on Jun, 30 2016 @ 12:16 PM
link   
a reply to: TheKnightofDoom

No this:








posted on Jun, 30 2016 @ 12:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: CagliostroTheGreat
bobs_uruncle

So... let me see if I get it:

Equal rights for LGBT individuals equates to "societies bearings degrading"?

Am I getting it?


Nice try at baiting lol. I didn't say any specific facet of society was degrading, it's degrading in general. If you read into it the wrong way, that's on you.

Cheers - Dave



posted on Jun, 30 2016 @ 12:21 PM
link   
a reply to: BuzzyWigs

You were being serious and being nice.

I have no problem with ruining the 'safe space' for this OP and ' Triggering' him.

This is the first time I have used those terms. I finally have a use for them.



posted on Jun, 30 2016 @ 12:21 PM
link   
bobs_uruncle

Is it really that far fetched to assume as much, considering the subject matter at hand?



posted on Jun, 30 2016 @ 12:25 PM
link   
Yeah, it's pretty messed up how the homosexuals hijacked the word "gay". I think a lot of people would be more comfortable with LGTB if it wasn't all about elevating hedonism.

Love who you want, but why turn your gay pride parade into porn simulations. It's very disturbing seeing children attending such obscene events.

All I know is that since the gays started coming out of the closet, that door is wide open now. Prepare to see freaks that will make today's appear modest.



posted on Jun, 30 2016 @ 12:27 PM
link   
a reply to: CagliostroTheGreat

It's competely far-fetched! The topic is about gay people so what in the world makes you think he'd be talking about gay people in his reply? That's ludicrous!

/sarcasm



posted on Jun, 30 2016 @ 12:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Kali74

Evolution, could be one factor

What's the evolution purpose of the LGBT community? If there isn't an evolutionary purpose, then would members of the LGBT community means that they have a genetic mutation or a mental illness. If it's a mental illness, shouldn't those people get help? Instead of being used as a political tool. If it's a genetic mutation, then that opens up a debate is how society should judge abnormal sexual desires. Normal sexual behavior is 6 women partners for males and 4 male partners for women. Which abnormal sexual behaviors should be acceptable, which should be tolerated, and which should be taboo?

I mean, If you think a 13 year old boy can "know" he's a girl and should be treated like a girl, and that's brave of him for thinking that. Then how do you tell another 13 year old boy that he cannot "know" that he wants to have sex with the subway spokesman?



posted on Jun, 30 2016 @ 12:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Kali74

Evolution, could be one factor

What's the evolution purpose of the LGBT community? If there isn't an evolutionary purpose, then would members of the LGBT community means that they have a genetic mutation or a mental illness. If it's a mental illness, shouldn't those people get help? Instead of being used as a political tool. If it's a genetic mutation, then that opens up a debate is how society should judge abnormal sexual desires. Normal sexual behavior is 6 women partners for males and 4 male partners for women. Which abnormal sexual behaviors should be acceptable, which should be tolerated, and which should be taboo?

I mean, If you think a 13 year old boy can "know" he's a girl and should be treated like a girl, and that's brave of him for thinking that. Then how do you tell another 13 year old boy that he cannot "know" that he wants to have sex with the subway spokesman?



posted on Jun, 30 2016 @ 12:28 PM
link   
double post


edit on 30-6-2016 by thinline because: double post



posted on Jun, 30 2016 @ 12:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: harvestdog
Yeah, it's pretty messed up how the homosexuals hijacke the word "gay"..


It is beyond ridiculous that you typed that in a serious manner.



posted on Jun, 30 2016 @ 12:33 PM
link   
a reply to: thinline

I can't have more than 4 male partners? I must have some sort of mutation, it is already way too late for that.



posted on Jun, 30 2016 @ 12:35 PM
link   
a reply to: thinline

It's not known whether homosexuality, bi-sexuality or transgenderism has an evolutionary function or not. We're over 7 billion people on the planet now... maybe this is natures way of telling us to slow down.



posted on Jun, 30 2016 @ 12:35 PM
link   
You guys! Seriously, try my recipe above!

It's awesome. Try it, and tell me how you experienced it.

The Music and the Image and the Breathing.....

I'm about to do it again - round 3. It's a great package!!



I'm having a good time anyway -



posted on Jun, 30 2016 @ 12:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: harvestdog

All I know is that since the gays started coming out of the closet, that door is wide open now.


They were 'out of the closet' in ancient times. You may mean the US version of 'out of the closet', that would be the late 1950s. What has come out of the 'wide open door' since the late 1950s?



posted on Jun, 30 2016 @ 12:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: harvestdog
Yeah, it's pretty messed up how the homosexuals hijacke the word "gay"..


It is beyond ridiculous that you typed that in a serious manner.




gay (n.) Look up gay at Dictionary.com
"a (usually male) homosexual," by 1971, from gay (adj.). In Middle English it meant "excellent person, noble lady, gallant knight," also "something gay or bright; an ornament or badge" (c. 1400).


etymonline



posted on Jun, 30 2016 @ 12:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: harvestdog


All I know is that since the gays started coming out of the closet, that door is wide open now. Prepare to see freaks that will make today's appear modest.



Sounds like fun!

I hope we heterosexual freaks will be allowed to participate. I'll bring the tequila, the baby oil and the leather accouterments.
edit on 30-6-2016 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 30 2016 @ 12:39 PM
link   
a reply to: harvestdog

People in Victorian times meant it as a happy and often sexually liberated person. It was later used as a pejorative to describe homosexual people. It was not hijacked by homosexual people.


edit on 30-6-2016 by reldra because: (no reason given)







 
13
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join