It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Orlando sacirifce in preparation for the BRexit vote

page: 5
16
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 08:32 PM
link   
a reply to: onequestion



The numbers came from experience that were had through things that we cannot speak of on ATS.

Oh.
In that case, if we can't speak of it on ATS, it must be true.




posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 08:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

I believe everything I was told in school.



posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 08:34 PM
link   
a reply to: onequestion

1+2=3 is correct. But to get the six month you would need to take the equation and the answer together to get 6. What's the point of the equation in the first place?



posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 08:34 PM
link   
I don't believe anything if it doesn't make sense.



posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 08:35 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryDon79

I have a counter question for you...

Are you asking a question you know the answer to instead of just saying what you mean in the first place?



posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 08:36 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 08:38 PM
link   
a reply to: onequestion

You mean where people just agree with me? That's a forum that's hard to find and what would be the point?
Or is that what you're looking for? In which case, you may be on the wrong site entirely.
edit on 6/29/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 08:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

I'm looking to have a discussion with like minds not deal with ignorant skepticism.
edit on 6/29/2016 by onequestion because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 08:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: TerryDon79

I have a counter question for you...

Are you asking a question you know the answer to instead of just saying what you mean in the first place?


Yes, I am. It's simply this.

The same 1+2=3 has been used in so many different forms to suit whatever they/you want it to. It's also been used as a 2 (1+3=4 / 2=2) and whatever other variant there can be.

1+2=3 does not equal 1+2+3.

It's simply used to fit whatever it needs to fit to.



posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 08:41 PM
link   
a reply to: onequestion



I'm looking to have a discussion with like minds

Yeah. I notice.
You don't like it when people disagree with you.

Numerology is nonsense. No different than reading tea leaves.

edit on 6/29/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 08:42 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 08:42 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 08:43 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 08:43 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 08:44 PM
link   

ENOUGH!!!



Stop the bickering NOW.

You can either discuss the thread topic, or we will shut this down NOW.

No GATEKEEPING.

ALL opinions are welcome here.

Do not reply to this post.



posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 08:45 PM
link   
a reply to: onequestion

To offer counterpoint.
Discussion.



posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 08:45 PM
link   
a reply to: onequestion

It's got nothing to do with believing in it or not. I'm just showing the many ways it's flawed and manipulated to fit whatever the current "in topic" is.



posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 08:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Gothmog




The "numerology" of the ancients led to Euclid , Pythagoras , the Golden Ratio and others .

No. The numbers came first. For counting bushels of wheat and casks of beer.
Later people starting playing silly games with them.

Which , is precisely what I said. Notice how I did not take "numbers" all the way back to the beginning ? No comment on the statement that is where certain "advanced" mathematics started ? Noticing that numbers were relevant to the world around them . Not just for counting at the point in time .
Pythagoras didnt pull the math behind Hypotenuse and Cathetus (sp? , I am doing this from memory) out his rear. They ideas came from his observance of nature.
And again , I do not fully believe in numerology .Only in its relation to the history of advanced math . But , and there is always one in the group , there is something to be said in defense.



posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 08:52 PM
link   
a reply to: onequestion



If the UK was aloud to leave the EU it was done with intent.


Allowed. If the UK was 'allowed', not 'aloud'.
Aloud is to state something that others can hear, not just think it.



posted on Jun, 29 2016 @ 08:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: onequestion



If the UK was aloud to leave the EU it was done with intent.


Allowed. If the UK was 'allowed', not 'aloud'.
Aloud is to state something that others can hear, not just think it.



Woops.

Thanks mom.



new topics

top topics



 
16
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join