It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Naturallywired
I remember a band named Boston and then it was Chicago, or was it the other way around? Whoa that Mandela effect!!
originally posted by: alphacenturi
He has always been Rod Serling, sorry. Im 55.
originally posted by: M4nWithNoN4me
No offense, but I hope we don't soon see a thread titled "MANDELA EFFECT: Stephen Hawkens is now Stephen Hawking... When did this happen??"
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: anton74
What's next screwing up Gene Roddenbury?
Whoa, whoa, whoa. Stop the clock.
In my timeline he is Jean Rodserlingbury.
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
originally posted by: gort51
a reply to: SeaWorthy
Im sorry Ol Salty.....Its always been Rod Serling.
Even in the 1960s.
Yes, many people thought Stirling.....because it was a more common name, easy to say, in use more often and sounded similar.
In the 60s, you had "Pounds Sterling", Stirling Moss (GP driver), "stirling effort young man" (in English movies).....etc.
But Rod Serling it was.
Thanks Gort "Klaatu barada nikto"
Agree to disagree!
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: anton74
George Lucas.
originally posted by: cuckooold
a reply to: SeaWorthy
I'm curious with this so-called Mandela Effect that the names discussed are so close in sound to each other. Serling or Stirling, Kit Kat or Kit-Kat, Berenstein or Berenstain.
Why isn't it something like people remember Dustin Hoffman being named Horatio Jones, or Mars Bars used to be called Comet Chocolate Spew?
Can this be explained, or is this too a mysterious part of the Mandela Effect?