It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BubbaJoe
No the actual breakdown is the bigots and haters in our country.
Outside of that all men and women would be created equal.
"I see absolutely no value to a judge of spending decades, years, months, weeks, day, hours, minutes, or seconds studying the Constitution"
originally posted by: burntheships
originally posted by: BubbaJoe
No the actual breakdown is the bigots and haters in our country.
Two different things, but even after we had the 13th, 14th, and
15th Amendments your example is is why changing The Constitution
based upon culture would be disastrous.
Look at this current society, hate and discrimination
are rewarded and lauded in Hollywood. Music culture
encourages violence, political correctness in all its
hypocrisy....examples of yes there are problems in
society but changing The Constitution will not fix this.
Outside of that all men and women would be created equal.
Governments will always gravitate to elevate the rich, looking at
any 1st world country will tell you that much, which is one reason
why the framers based the language on unalienable rights.
They did not want to create a government that would end up
being the cause of another Revolution, cant have those too
often too many lives lost.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Spiramirabilis
I'll ask you then since no one has answered thus far.
WHAT about the constitution needs changed?
originally posted by: Grimpachi
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Spiramirabilis
I'll ask you then since no one has answered thus far.
WHAT about the constitution needs changed?
I will answer with my own opinion.
There should be an amendment that would nullify the corporations are people ruling which would limit political contributions from both corporations and unions.
Reinterpreting the 2nd amendment wouldn't be about access - it would be about reexamining the nature of the word right
There should be an amendment that would nullify the corporations are people ruling which would limit political contributions from both corporations and unions.
Corporate personhood is the legal notion that a corporation, separately from its associated human beings (like owners, managers, or employees), has some, but not all, of the legal rights and responsibilities enjoyed by natural persons (physical humans).[1] For example, corporations have the right to enter into contracts with other parties and to sue or be sued in court in the same way as natural persons or unincorporated associations of persons.
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: neo96
Finally we get to the truth of the matter.
REDEFINING RIGHTS.
Be not afraid little neo
This is a good thing
:-)
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Spiramirabilis
Reinterpreting the 2nd amendment wouldn't be about access - it would be about reexamining the nature of the word right
Finally we get to the truth of the matter.
REDEFINING RIGHTS.