It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trey Gowdy news conference on Benghazi

page: 3
37
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 28 2016 @ 10:12 AM
link   
a reply to: Gin

Ha ha




posted on Jun, 28 2016 @ 10:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: introvert
Good lord.

Now a member of the committee and on stage blaming the media and the democrats.

What a bunch of punks.



What's not true about that?

You guys are living proof he is correct.



He said it was the media and the democrats that were making this issue about one person.

That is half true. The Right Wing media and the Right Wing nuts have made this about Hillary since day one. It is disingenuous to try to shift blame to the Democrats once they finally end their investigation and do not have a smoking gun.

Are you willing to admit that this has always been about Hillary and trying to find something to stick to her?



posted on Jun, 28 2016 @ 10:13 AM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Funny Trey Gowdy says he didn't say that. Nothing at Hillary's feet.



posted on Jun, 28 2016 @ 10:15 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Oh you read it already? 800 pages since an hour ago? Wonderful. Thank you Evelyn woods.



posted on Jun, 28 2016 @ 10:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: introvert
Good lord.

Now a member of the committee and on stage blaming the media and the democrats.

What a bunch of punks.



What's not true about that?

You guys are living proof he is correct.



He said it was the media and the democrats that were making this issue about one person.

That is half true. The Right Wing media and the Right Wing nuts have made this about Hillary since day one. It is disingenuous to try to shift blame to the Democrats once they finally end their investigation and do not have a smoking gun.

Are you willing to admit that this has always been about Hillary and trying to find something to stick to her?




On advice of my counsel,

I invoke my 5th amendment rights.

125 times, if need be.




posted on Jun, 28 2016 @ 10:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert

Who was in charge when this event happened?
This was a result of Obamas foreign policy was it not?
Foreign policy that was to be executed by the administrations chief foreign policy adviser, the Secretary of State.

So who else would be responsible for this event?



The Ambassador and the 3 were just left there to die.

Because of obama's and hillary's foreign policy.


So it was Hillary and Obama that pushed for security funding to be cut overseas? Oh yeah it was the GOP that pushed for the cuts in security.



posted on Jun, 28 2016 @ 10:17 AM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy

No it's not. It is being interpreted that way by the usual suspects, how surprising.



posted on Jun, 28 2016 @ 10:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: introvert
Good lord.

Now a member of the committee and on stage blaming the media and the democrats.

What a bunch of punks.



What's not true about that?

You guys are living proof he is correct.



He said it was the media and the democrats that were making this issue about one person.

That is half true. The Right Wing media and the Right Wing nuts have made this about Hillary since day one. It is disingenuous to try to shift blame to the Democrats once they finally end their investigation and do not have a smoking gun.

Are you willing to admit that this has always been about Hillary and trying to find something to stick to her?




On advice of my counsel,

I invoke my 5th amendment rights.

125 times, if need be.



Exactly.

That how dishonest and disingenuous many on the Right are.

They spent millions of our tax dollars and spread constant propaganda about how guilty Obama and Hillary are, and now that the investigation does not produce the smoking gun...it's the Democrat's fault and you guys backtrack from your previous statements.



posted on Jun, 28 2016 @ 10:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Funny Trey Gowdy says he didn't say that. Nothing at Hillary's feet.



He also said if you didn't give a crap in 2012, you won't give a crap now.

So, there's that.





posted on Jun, 28 2016 @ 10:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: buster2010

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: buster2010

I'm sorry I missed the part where Mr. Gowdy admitted the report is a total failure.

Are you proposing this event should not have been investigated? Or do you just disagree with the way the investigation was carried out?


And Trump is not mentioned ONCE in the report! OMG!! lol.

I wonder why? The dems report mentioned Trump more than the 2 that were killed.






So nothing to refute what I posted huh? Well that would be a little much to expect from a Trump supporter.


This is about hillary, Benghazi and obama, not me and Trump.

Get it?




Then don't bring Trump into it understand?



posted on Jun, 28 2016 @ 10:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
I've been reading up on the reports so far and it appears that there is not much to learn. There's a whole lot of "should-coulda-woulda", but nothing damning against the Obama admin or Hillary.

Doesn't matter though. The Benghazi aspect has already been made in to a conspiracy that the Right Wing nuts will never let go.


Aren't you, even as a rabid Hillary apologist, even a bit curious as to why Hillary emailed Chelsea privately that the attack was an Al-Queda inspired terrorist attack, then publicly told the victims families and the public that it was because of a YouTube video?



posted on Jun, 28 2016 @ 10:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: burgerbuddy
a reply to: burgerbuddy

People died and hillary lied.

Not a thing was done to help.

"they couldn't get there in time to help because no one gave the go ahead"

" no military assets were moving towards Benghazi"

They said that in the aftermath when people were sent, it was without uniforms!

Obama pulled Stevens's guard because of his "no boots on the ground"

It's sounding bad for hillary and obama.



You got it backwards... It was Bush lied and people died.

In this one, if true it would be... People died and Hillary lied.

I think there's a big difference



posted on Jun, 28 2016 @ 10:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: buster2010

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert

Who was in charge when this event happened?
This was a result of Obamas foreign policy was it not?
Foreign policy that was to be executed by the administrations chief foreign policy adviser, the Secretary of State.

So who else would be responsible for this event?



The Ambassador and the 3 were just left there to die.

Because of obama's and hillary's foreign policy.


So it was Hillary and Obama that pushed for security funding to be cut overseas? Oh yeah it was the GOP that pushed for the cuts in security.



Hey! By george, I think you've got it!

All wrong, that is.

Obama pulled his military escort because of "no boots on the ground"

They didn't want american military there because they didn't want to offend or scare the muslims they just "liberated".

No fortification or scary belt fed machine guns.

56 days out from the election and Libya was supposed to be the crown jewel in hillary's crown.

Couldn't have it known it was a terrorist attack in a liberated country, can we?

After all, GM was alive and Bin Laden was dead. Sooooooo....LIE!!!




posted on Jun, 28 2016 @ 10:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: Bedlam

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: burgerbuddy

Lots of people had it pegged.

Now Hillary can answer.





What difference, at this point, does it make?



That's the exact same thing Hillary said.




posted on Jun, 28 2016 @ 10:27 AM
link   
Does anyone think this event should not have been investigated?



I get a difference in opinions as to how the investigation was carried out. It was crap, and not deserving of those who died in the event.

If not Obama, and by position Hillary, who is responsible? It is not like Hillary offered any resistance to Obamas foreign policy decisions.



posted on Jun, 28 2016 @ 10:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: burgerbuddy

No it's not. It is being interpreted that way by the usual suspects, how surprising.



Really, your gal is a killer by gross negligence.

She has no critical judgement skills at all or brains.

Hell is too good for her.




posted on Jun, 28 2016 @ 10:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: introvert
Good lord.

Now a member of the committee and on stage blaming the media and the democrats.

What a bunch of punks.



What's not true about that?

You guys are living proof he is correct.



He said it was the media and the democrats that were making this issue about one person.

That is half true. The Right Wing media and the Right Wing nuts have made this about Hillary since day one. It is disingenuous to try to shift blame to the Democrats once they finally end their investigation and do not have a smoking gun.

Are you willing to admit that this has always been about Hillary and trying to find something to stick to her?




On advice of my counsel,

I invoke my 5th amendment rights.

125 times, if need be.



Exactly.

That how dishonest and disingenuous many on the Right are.

They spent millions of our tax dollars and spread constant propaganda about how guilty Obama and Hillary are, and now that the investigation does not produce the smoking gun...it's the Democrat's fault and you guys backtrack from your previous statements.



Since when have the left EVER worried about spending money?

Hillary approved something like 20 mil for libya's security BS.

But no money for the ambassador.

So ya'll can look it up when you read the report.




posted on Jun, 28 2016 @ 10:36 AM
link   
Interesting they tried to block the video immediately. That is a violation of the 1st Amendment. Not even sure why the video is even an issue. The issue is the SD failed to acknowledge security concerns. They were not prepared. Didn't even know what assets were in the area, response times....total failure on the SD.



posted on Jun, 28 2016 @ 10:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: buster2010

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: buster2010

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: buster2010

I'm sorry I missed the part where Mr. Gowdy admitted the report is a total failure.

Are you proposing this event should not have been investigated? Or do you just disagree with the way the investigation was carried out?


And Trump is not mentioned ONCE in the report! OMG!! lol.

I wonder why? The dems report mentioned Trump more than the 2 that were killed.






So nothing to refute what I posted huh? Well that would be a little much to expect from a Trump supporter.


This is about hillary, Benghazi and obama, not me and Trump.

Get it?




Then don't bring Trump into it understand?



Ya ok, anything you say buster.

We good? lololol!




posted on Jun, 28 2016 @ 10:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: damwel

originally posted by: burgerbuddy
a reply to: burgerbuddy

People died and hillary lied.

Not a thing was done to help.

"they couldn't get there in time to help because no one gave the go ahead"

" no military assets were moving towards Benghazi"

They said that in the aftermath when people were sent, it was without uniforms!

Obama pulled Stevens's guard because of his "no boots on the ground"

It's sounding bad for hillary and obama.



You got it backwards... It was Bush lied and people died.

In this one, if true it would be... People died and Hillary lied.

I think there's a big difference



You do know that I hate stewie avi's, right?

Is that a trick question, btw?






new topics

top topics



 
37
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join